Is Phenomenal Consciousness a Complex Structure?

Appelbaum, I. (1998). Modularity. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.), A Companion to

cognitive science. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and

Brain Sciences, 18, 227-287.

Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (Eds.). (1992). The adapted mind: evolutionary

psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

Carruthers, P. (2003). On fodor’s problem. Mind and Language, 18, 502-523.

Churchland, P.S., & Sejnowski, T.J. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge,

MA: MIT Press.

Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Function of the thalamic reticular complex: The

searchlight hypothesis. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 287-296.

Davies, P.S. (1996). Discovering the functional mesh: On the methods of

evolutionary psychology. Minds and Machines, 6, 559-585.

— (1999). The conflict of evolutionary psychology. In V. Hardcastle

(Ed.), Where biology meets psychology (pp. 67-81). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dretske, F. (1995). Naturalizing the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Farah, M.J. (1994). Neuropsychological inference with an interactive brain: A critique

of the “locality” assumption. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 43-104.

— (1997). Visual perception and visual awareness after brain damage. In

N. Block, O. Flanagan, & G. Guzeldere (Eds.), The nature of consciousness:

philosophical debates (pp. 203-236). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Flanagan, O. (1997). Conscious inessentialism and the epiphenomenalist suspicion.

In N. Block, O. Flanagan, and G. Guzeldere (Eds.), The nature of consciousness:

philosophical debates (pp. 357-373). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J.A. (2000). The mind doesn’t work that way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Godfrey-Smith, P. (1996). Complexity and the function of mind in nature. New York:

Cambridge University Press.

Grantham, T. & Nichols, S. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: ultimate explanations

and panglossian predictions. In V. Hardcastle (Ed.), Where biology meets psychology (pp. 47-66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hardcastle, V. (Ed.). (1999). Where biology meets psychology: Connections, constraints,

conjectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hardcastle, V. (1996). How to build a theory in cognitive science. Albany: State

University of New York Press.

McNamara, T.P. (1999). Single-code versus multiple-code theories in cognition.

In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and

processing of visual information. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a Bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435-450.

Nichols, S. & Grantham, T. (2000). Adaptive complexity and phenomenal

Consciousness. Philosophy of Science, 67, 648-670.

Okasha, S. (2003). Fodor on cognition, modularity, and adaptationism. Philosophy

of Science, 70, 68-88.

Polger, T. & Flanagan, O. (1999). Natural answers to natural questions. In V. Hardcastle (Ed.), Where biology meets psychology (pp. 221- 247). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Revonsuo, A. & Kamppinen, M. (Eds.). (1994). Consciousness in philosophy and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 173-203). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

Shapiro, L.A. (1999). Presence of mind. In V. Hardcastle (Ed.), Where biology meets psychology (pp. 83-98). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tye, M. (1995). Blindsight, orgasm, and representational overlap. Behavioral and

Brain Sciences, 18, 268-269.

Young, A.W. (1994). Neuropsychology of awareness. In A. Revonsuo and M.

Kamppinen (Eds.), Consciousness in philosophy and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 173-203).

Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.