Cogprints

L’auto-archivage en France : deux exemples de politiques différentes et leurs résultats

Bosc, Hélène (2008) L’auto-archivage en France : deux exemples de politiques différentes et leurs résultats. [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Updated Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives.

120Kb

Abstract

In France, the first Institutional Repositories (IRs) were set up in 2002, using the E-Prints software. At the same time, a centralized repository was organized by CNRS, a French multidisciplinary research institute, for the deposit of all French research output. In 2006, most of the French scientific and scholarly research organisations signed a “Protocol of Agreement” to collaborate in the development of this national archive, HAL. Independently, the Ifremer Research Institute launched its own IR (Archimer) in 2005. We have compared the development of HAL and Archimer. Our results show that Ifremer’s policy of self-archiving has resulted in 80% of its research output being made Open Access (OA). In the same time interval, HAL, lacking a self-archiving mandate, had only 10% of its target research output deposited. Ifremer’s specific implementation of its mandate (a staff dedicated to self-archiving) is probably not affordable for most French research institutions but its self-archiving mandate itself is, and Arthur Sale’s comparative studies in Australia have shown that the essential element is the mandate itself. The European Universities Association, mindful of the benefits of mandating OA, has recommended self-archiving mandates for its 791 universities. Self-archiving mandates have already been adopted by 22 universities and research institutions worldwide (including Harvard, Southampton, CERN, and one CNRS research laboratory) as well as 22 research funding agencies (including NIH, ERC, & RCUK). OA maximizes research usage and impact. It is time for each of the universities and research institutions of France to adopt their own OA self-archiving mandates.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:Open Access, OA, Self-archiving, Research policy, OA Mandates, Research Productivity
Subjects:Electronic Publishing > Archives
ID Code:6284
Deposited By:Bosc, Hélène
Deposited On:24 Nov 2008 23:39
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

BRULEY C. et al., Bilan d’une enquête sur les archives ouvertes dans les établissements

d’enseignement supérieur et de recherche . AMESTIST n° 2, 2008.

<http://ametist.inist.fr/document.php?id=417>

CARR, L. and HARNAD, S. Keystroke economy: a study of the time and effort involved in selfarchiving.

Technical Report, ECS, University of Southampton, 2005.

<http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10688/>

SALE A. The patchwork mandate. D-Lib Magazine, 13 (1/2), January/February, 2007.

http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/sale/01sale.html /

STIX, G. The speed of write. Scientific American, December 1994, p.72-77

SWAN, A. The culture of Open Access: researchers’ views and responses. In : Jacobs, N., Eds.

Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Oxford : Chandos, chapter 7,

p.52-59, 2006.

<http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12428/>

SWAN, A. and CARR, L. Institutions, their repositories and the Web. Serials Review, 34 (1)

2008.

<http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14965/1/Serials_Review_article.doc>

SWAN A. et al Developing a model for e-prints and open access journal content in UK further

and higher education. Learned Publishing 18(1): 25-40, 2005.

<http://cogprints.org/4120/>

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page