Mental Representations: the New Sense-Data?

Stieg, Chuck (2004) Mental Representations: the New Sense-Data? (Unpublished)

Full text available as:

[img]Other (Word) - Draft Version
PDF (Word to PDF conversion (via antiword) conversion from other to application/pdf)


The notion of representation has become ubiquitous throughout cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience and the cognitive sciences generally. This paper addresses the status of mental representations as entities that have been posited to explain cognition. I do so by examining similarities between mental representations and sense-data in both their characteristics and key arguments offered for each. I hope to show that more caution in the adoption and use of representations in explaining cognition is warranted. Moreover, by paying attention to problematic notions of representations, a less problematic sense of representation might emerge.

Item Type:Other
Keywords:Mental Representation, Sense Data
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy > Philosophy of Science
Philosophy > Epistemology
Philosophy > Metaphysics
Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
ID Code:6174
Deposited By:Stieg, Chuck
Deposited On:24 Aug 2008 11:56
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Akins, K. (1996). Of Sensory Systems and the ‘Aboutness’ of Mental States. Journal of

Philosophy 93: 337-72.

Andersen, J.R. (1983), The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University


Austin, J.L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ayer, A.J. (1955). The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd.

Bechtel, W., et al. (Eds.). (2001). Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader. Malden, MA:

Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Bechtel, W. (2001). Representations: From Neural Systems to Cognitive Systems. In W.

Bechtel, et al. (Eds.), Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader (pp.332-348).

Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge,

MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J.A. (1996). The Mind-Body Problem. In S.M. Cahn, P. Kitcher, G. Sher & P. Markie

(Eds.), Reason at Work (pp. 715-729). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

Fodor, J.A. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, Inc.

Grush, R. (1997). The Architecture of Representation. Philosophical Psychology 10: 5-23.

Hume, D. (1962). An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. A. Flew (ed.), New York:

Macmillan Publishing Company.

Jackson, F. (2000). Some Reflections on Representationalism. draft for NYU seminar, 5 April

2000, posted at


Jackson, F. (1977). Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kosslyn, S.M., Ball, T.M., & Reiser, B.J. (1978) Visual Images Preserve Metric Spatial

Information: Evidence from Studies of Image Scanning. Journal of Experimental

Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4: 47-60.

Martin, M.G.F. (2000). Beyond Dispute: Sense-data, Intentionality and the Mind-body

Problem. In T. Crane & S. Patterson (Eds.), History of the Mind-Body Problem.

(pp.195-231). New York: Routledge.

Martinez, M.E. (1999). Cognitive Representations: Distinctions, Implications, and

Elaborations. In I. Sigel (Ed.) Development of Mental Representation: Theories and

Applications (pp.12-32). Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.

McNamara, T.P. (1999). Single-Code versus Multiple-Code Theories in Cognition. In R.J.

Sternberg (Ed.) The Nature of Cognition. (pp.113-35). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Millikan, R.G. (1989). Biosemantics. In S.P. Stich & T.A. Warfield (Eds.), Mental

Representation: A Reader. (pp.243-58). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Moore, G.E. (1978) Some Main Problems of Philosophy. New York: Humanities Press Inc.

First published in 1953.

Newell, A. & Simon H.A. (1981). Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and

Search. In Haugeland (Ed.) Mind Design (pp.35-66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Putnam, H. (1994). Sense, Nonsense, and the Senses: An Inquiry into the Powers of the Human

Mind. Journal of Philosophy 91: 445-517.

Ratcliff, R. & McKoon, G. (1978). Priming in Item Recognition: Evidence for the Propositional

Structure of Sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17: 403-21.

Rey, G. (1995). A Not ‘Merely Empirical’ Argument for a Language of Thought.

Philosophical Perspectives, 9, AI, Connectionism, and Psychology, 1995, 9: 201-22.

Robinson, H. (1994). Perception. New York: Routledge.

Russell, B. (1912). The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Searle, J.R. (1997). The Mystery of Consciousness. New York: New York Review, Inc.

Searle, J.R. (1994). Intentionality. In S. Guttenplan (Ed.) A Companion to the Philosophy

Of Mind. (pp.379-86). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Shanon, B. (1992). Are Connectionist Models Cognitive? Philosophical Psychology 5:


Shepard, R.N., & Cooper, L.A. (1982) Mental Images and their Transformations.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Shepard, R.N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects.

Science 171: 701-03.

Stufflebeam, R.S. (2001). Brain Matters: A Case Against Representations in the Brain.

In W. Bechtel et al. (Eds.) (pp.395-413). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Tye, M. (2000). Consciousness, Color, and Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Van Gelder, T. (1995). What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation? Journal of

Philosophy 92: 345-381.


Repository Staff Only: item control page