Harnad, Stevan (2001) What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? [Book Chapter] (In Press)
![]() | There is a more recent version of this item available. |
| HTML 35Kb |
Abstract
Searle's Chinese Room Argument showed a fatal flaw in computationalism (the idea that mental states are just computational states) and helped usher in the era of situated robotics and symbol grounding (although Searle himself thought neuroscience was the only correct way to understand the mind).
| Item Type: | Book Chapter |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Searle, Chinese Room Argument, Turing Test, Symbol Grounding, computationalism, cognitivism, robotics, language functionalism, neuroscience |
| Subjects: | Psychology > Cognitive Psychology Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence Computer Science > Robotics Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind |
| ID Code: | 1622 |
| Deposited By: | Harnad, Stevan |
| Deposited On: | 19 Jun 2001 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Dec 2009 19:17 |
Available Versions of this Item
- What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? (deposited 19 Jun 2001) [Currently Displayed]
References in Article
Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.
Metadata
- ID Plus Text Citation
- RDF+XML
- BibTeX
- Pageflow Montage
- JSON
- Dublin Core
- OAI-ORE Resource Map (Atom Format)
- Simple Metadata
- Refer
- METS
- OAI-ORE Resource Map (RDF Format)
- Search Data Dump
- Pageflow
- HTML Citation
- ASCII Citation
- YAML
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- OpenURL ContextObject
- EndNote
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- MODS
- DIDL
- EP3 XML
- Reference Manager
- RDF+N3
- Eprints Application Profile
Repository Staff Only: item control page


