@prefix epid: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix epx: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix event: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix ep: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix eprel: .
@prefix dct: .
<>
foaf:primaryTopic ;
rdfs:comment "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "ICMLws09.pdf"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "lightbox.jpg"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "preview.jpg"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "medium.jpg"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "small.jpg"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "indexcodes.txt"^^xsd:string .
dc:format "text/html";
dc:title "HTML Summary of #7691 \n\nReplicability is not Reproducibility:
\nNor is it Good Science\n\n";
foaf:primaryTopic .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
rdf:type bibo:Document,
ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Replicability is not Reproducibility:\r\nNor is it Good Science (PDF)"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:islightboxThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Replicability is not Reproducibility:\r\nNor is it Good Science (Image (PNG))"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:ispreviewThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Replicability is not Reproducibility:\r\nNor is it Good Science (Image (PNG))"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:ismediumThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Replicability is not Reproducibility:\r\nNor is it Good Science (Image (PNG))"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:issmallThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Replicability is not Reproducibility:\r\nNor is it Good Science (Image (PNG))"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isIndexCodesVersionOf ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Replicability is not Reproducibility:\r\nNor is it Good Science (Indexer Terms)"^^xsd:string .
rdf:_1 .
bibo:abstract " At various machine learning conferences, at various times, there have been discussions arising from the inability to replicate the experimental results published in a paper. There seems to be a wide spread view that we need to do something to address this problem, as it is essential to the advancement of our field. The most compelling argument would seem to be that reproducibility of experimental results is the hallmark of science. Therefore, given that most of us regard machine learning as a scientific discipline, being able to replicate experiments is paramount. I want to challenge this view by separating the notion of reproducibility, a generally desirable property, from replicability, its poor cousin. I claim there are important differences between the two. Reproducibility requires changes; replicability avoids them. Although reproducibility is desirable, I contend that the impoverished version, replicability, is one not worth having."^^xsd:string;
bibo:authorList ;
bibo:status ,
;
dct:creator ;
dct:date "2009-06-18";
dct:isPartOf ;
dct:subject ;
dct:title "Replicability is not Reproducibility:\r\nNor is it Good Science"^^xsd:string;
ep:hasDocument ,
,
,
,
,
;
rdf:type bibo:Article,
ep:ConfpaperEPrint,
ep:EPrint;
rdfs:seeAlso .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Artificial Intelligence" .
foaf:familyName "Drummond"^^xsd:string;
foaf:givenName "Chris"^^xsd:string;
foaf:name "Chris Drummond"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type foaf:Person .