creators_name: Kirsh, Marvin/E. 
editors_name: Antonopolous, Georgios
type: journalp
datestamp: 2010-06-06 14:33:06
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:57:37
metadata_visibility: show
title: Anthropology and parallelism:The individual as a universal
ispublished: pub
subjects: phil-mind
subjects: phil-sci
full_text_status: public
keywords: Logical positivism, theory of relativity, universals and constants, parallelism, mechanization.

abstract: It is difficult to define perspective within sets that are self belonging. For example in the study of mankind, anthropology, both men and their studies fall into the same category that contains the topic outline. This situation entails a universal quality of uniqueness, an instance of it, to the topic of anthropology that may be viewed in parallel with the topic of nature as the set of unique particulars. Yet one
might assent to the notion in the inclusive study of man, anthropology, that nothing in its’ content
should conceivably be construed to exceed it, though in approaches to the topic, reference to the topic
of nature, unavoided, refer to the scientific topic of nature in which contemporary notions, when contrasted, exceed the perceptual experience of nature. In this presentation problems in approaches
and in the application of available tools for analysis to the study of man will be discussed. Framed
with respect to a concept of parallelism, notions and stimuli are introduced to augment and reorient
towards a more creative perspective with respect to the organization of first perspective considerations in studies. The theories of relativity, the idea of mathematical relations for simultaneous
events, the presence of artifactual paradoxes as they are reflected in thinking and the scientific tools
applied towards investigations are discussed and hopefully highlighted so that they may hopefully
be perceived distinctly form realities involved in the pursuit of studies.

date: 2009-11-15
date_type: published
publication: International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology
volume: 1
number: 7
publisher: Academic Journals Inc.
pagerange: 112115
refereed: TRUE
referencetext: Arntzeni F (2004). “Is quantum mechanics pointless?” Phil. Sci. 70(5):1447-1458.

Freud S. (2002). "Civilization and Its Discontents", London: Penguin,2002

Gilmore C (2006). Where in the Relativistic World Are We?
Philosophical Perspectives, 20, Metaphysics (2006).

Karnap R (1956). "The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts" in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. I, ed. by H. Feigl and M. Scriven, Minneapolis : University of Minnesota
Press

Kirsh ME (2008). “Induction, Space and Positive Ethics” Ludus Vitalis,16(30): 225-228

Nietzsche F (1967). On the Genealogy of Morals. trans. Walter Kaufmann and R.J. Hollingdale, in On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo.New York: Random House.

Ravenscroft I (1997). "Folk Psychology as a Theory", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 1997 Edition), Edward N. Zalta(ed.)

Stachel J, Martin JK, Kox J, Michel Janssen, R. Schulmann, Diana Komos Buchwald and others (Eds.) (1 987–2006). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol 1–10. Princeton University Press.

citation:   Kirsh, Dr. Marvin/E.   (2009) Anthropology and parallelism:The individual as a universal.  [Journal (Paginated)]     
document_url: http://cogprints.org/6848/1/Kirsh.pdf