--- abstract: 'Schenk and McIntosh (2009) present the thesis that most visual behaviours, especially those of any significant complexity, are likely to involve collaboration between both visual streams. While very likely true, this statement does not contradict the perception-action model as proposed by Milner and Goodale (1995, 2006). The two visual system hypothesis implies two functionally specialized systems, and not, as Schenk and McIntosh propose, two behaviourally independent systems.' altloc: - http://artsweb.uwaterloo.ca/~jalockli/p/Locklin2010.pdf chapter: ~ commentary: ~ commref: 'Schenk, T. and McIntosh, R. (2009). Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action? Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1):1–15. ' confdates: ~ conference: ~ confloc: ~ contact_email: ~ creators_id: - jalockli@uwaterloo.ca - jdancker@uwaterloo.ca creators_name: - family: Locklin given: Jason honourific: Mr. lineage: '' - family: Danckert given: James honourific: Dr. lineage: '' date: 2010-04-12 date_type: completed datestamp: 2010-05-04 22:05:27 department: ~ dir: disk0/00/00/68/21 edit_lock_since: ~ edit_lock_until: ~ edit_lock_user: ~ editors_id: [] editors_name: [] eprint_status: archive eprintid: 6821 fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/6821/1/Locklin2010.pdf full_text_status: public importid: ~ institution: ~ isbn: ~ ispublished: ~ issn: ~ item_issues_comment: [] item_issues_count: 0 item_issues_description: [] item_issues_id: [] item_issues_reported_by: [] item_issues_resolved_by: [] item_issues_status: [] item_issues_timestamp: [] item_issues_type: [] keywords: 'Perception and Action, Visualmotor control, Stroke.' lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:57:36 latitude: ~ longitude: ~ metadata_visibility: no_search note: ~ number: ~ pagerange: ~ pubdom: FALSE publication: ~ publisher: ~ refereed: FALSE referencetext: "Carey, D. P., Harvey, M., and Milner, A. D. (1996).\r\nVisuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a\r\npatient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia,\r\n34(5):329–337.\r\n\r\nDijkerman, H. C. and Milner, A. D. (1998). The per-\r\nception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth\r\nplane. ii. dissociated orientation functions in normal subjects. \r\nExp Brain Res, 118(3):408–414.\r\n\r\nDijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D., and Carey, D. P. (1996).\r\nThe perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth \r\nplane. i. effects of visual form agnosia. Exp Brain\r\nRes, 112(3):442–451.\r\n\r\nDijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D., and Carey, D. P. (1998).\r\nGrasping spatial relationships: failure to demonstrate allocentric \r\nvisual coding in a patient with visual form\r\nagnosia. Conscious Cogn, 7(3):424–437.\r\n\r\nDijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D., and Carey, D. P. (1999).\r\nMotion parallax enables depth processing for action in a visual \r\nform agnosic when binocular vision is unavail-\r\nable. Neuropsychologia, 37(13):1505–1510.\r\n\r\nGoodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., Milner, A. D., Perrett,\r\nD. I., Benson, P. J., and Hietanen, J. K. (1994). The\r\nnature and limits of orientation and pattern processing\r\nsupporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic.\r\nJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1):46–56.\r\n\r\nGoodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., and\r\nCarey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation be-\r\ntween perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature,\r\n349(6305):154–6. 0028-0836 (Print) Journal Article\r\nResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t.\r\n\r\nMcIntosh, R. D., Dijkerman, H. C., Mon-Williams, M.,\r\nand Milner, A. D. (2004). Grasping what is gras-\r\npable: evidence from visual form agnosia. Cortex,\r\n40(4-5):695–702.\r\n\r\nMilner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A. (1995). The Visual\r\nBrain in Action. Oxford University Press, USA.\r\n Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A. (2006). The Visual\r\nBrain in Action Second edition. Oxford University\r\nPress, USA.\r\n\r\nMilner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A. (2006). The Visual\r\nBrain in Action Second edition. Oxford University\r\nPress, USA.\r\n\r\nMon-Williams, M., McIntosh, R. D., and Milner, A. D.\r\n(2001a). Vertical gaze angle as a distance cue for pro-\r\ngramming reaching: insights from visual form agnosia\r\nii (of iii). Exp Brain Res, 139(2):137–142.\r\n\r\nMon-Williams, M., Tresilian, J. R., McIntosh, R. D., and\r\nMilner, A. D. (2001b). Monocular and binocular dis-\r\ntance cues: insights from visual form agnosia i (of iii).\r\nExp Brain Res, 139(2):127–136.\r\n\r\nSchenk, T. and McIntosh, R. (2009). Do we have indepen-\r\ndent visual streams for perception and action? Cogni-\r\ntive Neuroscience, 1(1):1–15." relation_type: [] relation_uri: [] reportno: ~ rev_number: 34 series: ~ source: ~ status_changed: 2010-05-04 22:05:27 subjects: - behav-neuro-sci succeeds: ~ suggestions: ~ sword_depositor: ~ sword_slug: ~ thesistype: ~ title: 'Do we have Independent Visual Streams for Perception and Action? a Response.' type: preprint userid: 10131 volume: ~