creators_name: Gabora, Liane
creators_id: liane.gabora@ubc.ca
editors_name: Davis, Alex
editors_name: Ludwig, Jeremy
type: confpaper
datestamp: 2008-11-23 09:22:28
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:57:14
metadata_visibility: show
title: Modeling Cultural Dynamics
ispublished: pub
subjects: soc-psy
subjects: evol-psy
subjects: comp-sci-art-intel
full_text_status: public
keywords: cultural borders, cultural boundaries, creativity, cultural evolution, imitation, leadership, media, population density, population size
abstract: EVOC (for EVOlution of Culture) is a computer model of culture that enables us to investigate how various factors such as barriers to cultural diffusion, the presence and choice of leaders, or changes in the ratio of innovation to imitation affect the diversity and effectiveness of ideas. It consists of neural network based agents that invent ideas for actions, and imitate neighbors’ actions. The model is based on a theory of culture according to which what evolves through culture is not memes or artifacts, but the internal models of the world that give rise to them, and they evolve not through a Darwinian process of competitive exclusion but a Lamarckian process involving exchange of innovation protocols. EVOC shows an increase in mean fitness of actions over time, and an increase and then decrease in the diversity of actions. Diversity of actions is positively correlated with population size and density, and with barriers between populations. Slowly eroding borders increase fitness without sacrificing diversity by fostering specialization followed by sharing of fit actions. Introducing a leader that broadcasts its actions throughout the population increases the fitness of actions but reduces diversity of actions. Increasing the number of leaders reduces this effect. Efforts are underway to simulate the conditions under which an agent immigrating from one culture to another contributes new ideas while still ‘fitting in’. 
date: 2008-11-06
date_type: published
publisher: AAAI Press
pagerange: 18-25
refereed: TRUE
referencetext: Aerts, D. & Gabora, L. 2005a. A state-context-property model of concepts and their combinations I: The structure of the sets of contexts and properties. Kybernetes 34(1&2): 151–175.
Aerts, D. & Gabora, L. 2005b. A state-context-property model of concepts and their combinations II: A Hilbert space representation. Kybernetes 34(1&2): 176–205.
Best, M. 1999. How culture can guide evolution: An inquiry into gene/meme enhancement and opposition. Adaptive Behavior 7(3): 289–293.
Best, M. 2006. Adaptive value within natural language discourse. Interaction Studies 7(1), 1-15.
Boone, J. L., Smith, E. A. 1998. Is it evolution yet? A critique of evolutionary archaeology. Current Anthropology, 39, S141–73.
Fracchia, J. & Lewontin, R. C. 1999. Does culture evolve? History and Theory 38(4): 52–78.
Gabora, L. 1994. A computer model of the evolution of culture. In R. Brooks & P. Maes (Eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Life, July 4-6, Boston MA.
Gabora, L. 1995. Meme and Variations: A computer model of cultural evolution. In L. Nadel & D. Stein (Eds.) 1993 Lectures in Complex Systems, pp. 471−486. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gabora, L. 2004. Ideas are not replicators but minds are. Biology & Philosophy 19(1): 127−143.
Gabora, L. 2006. The fate of evolutionary archaeology: Survival or extinction? World Archaeology 38(4): 690−696.
Gabora, L. 2008. The cultural evolution of socially situated cognition. Cognitive Systems Research 9(1–2): 104–113.
Gabora, L. 2008. EVOC: A computer model of cultural evolution. In V. Sloutsky, B. Love & K. McRae (Eds.), 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Washington DC, July 23-26, North Salt Lake, UT: Sheridan Publishing.
Gabora, L., Rosch, E., & Aerts, D. 2008. Toward an ecological theory of concepts. Ecoogical Psychology 20(1): 84−116. 
Gigliotta, O. Miglino, O. & Parisi, D. 2007. Groups of agents with a leader. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10(4).  http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/4/1.html
Gilbert, D. & Morgner, T.  JfreeChart. http://www.jfree. org/jfreechart/index.html
Higgs, P. G. 2000. The mimetic transition: a simulation study of the evolution of learning by imitation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267(1450): 1355–1361.
Hinton, G. E. 1981. Implementing semantic networks in parallel hardware. In Parallel Models of Associative Memory. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum Press.
Hinton, G. E. & Nowlan, S. J. 1987. How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems 1: 495–502.
Holland, J. K. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 
Hutchins, E. & Hazelhurst, B. (1991). Learning in the cultural crocess. In Langton, C., Taylor, J., Farmer, D., & Rasmussen, S. (Eds.) Artificial Life II. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley. 
Jeffreys, M. (2000). The meme metaphor. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 43(2): 227–242.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1992. Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds). 2006. The international handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krasnogor, N. & Gustafson, S. 2004. A study on the use of “self-generation” in memetic algorithms. Natural Computing 3(1): 53–76.
Marrone, P. Java Object Oriented Neural Engine (JOONE). www.jooneworld.com
Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and the genetics of Populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

citation:   Gabora, Dr. Liane  (2008) Modeling Cultural Dynamics.  [Conference Paper]     
document_url: http://cogprints.org/6266/1/AAAI_FS01GaboraL_wCite.pdf
document_url: http://cogprints.org/6266/2/AAAI_FS01GaboraL_wCite.pdf