@prefix epid: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix epx: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix event: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix ep: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix eprel: .
@prefix dct: .
<>
foaf:primaryTopic ;
rdfs:comment "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "199802005.html"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "indexcodes.txt"^^xsd:string .
dc:format "text/html";
dc:title "HTML Summary of #595 \n\nConsciousness, Causality and Complementarity\n\n";
foaf:primaryTopic .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
rdf:type bibo:Document,
ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Consciousness, Causality and Complementarity (HTML)"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isIndexCodesVersionOf ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Consciousness, Causality and Complementarity (Indexer Terms)"^^xsd:string .
rdf:_1 .
bibo:abstract "Abstract of 1991 target article: Investigations of the function of consciousness in human information processing have focused mainly on two questions: (1) where does consciousness enter into the information processing sequence and (2) how does conscious processing differ from preconscious and unconscious processing. Input analysis is thought to be initially \"preconscious,\" \"pre-attentive,\" fast, involuntary, and automatic. This is followed by \"conscious,\" \"focal-attentive\" analysis which is relatively slow, voluntary, and flexible. It is thought that simple, familiar stimuli can be identified preconsciously, but conscious processing is needed to identify complex, novel stimuli. Conscious processing has also been thought to be necessary for choice, learning and memory, and the organization of complex, novel responses, particularly those requiring planning, reflection, or creativity. The present target article reviews evidence that consciousness performs none of these functions. Consciousness nearly always results from focal-attentive processing (as a form of output) but does not itself enter into this or any other form of human information processing. This suggests that the term \"conscious process\" needs re-examination. Consciousness appears to be necessary in a variety of tasks because they require focal-attentive processing; if consciousness is absent, focal-attentive processing is absent. From a first-person perspective, however, conscious states are causally effective. First-person accounts are complementary to third-person accounts. Although they can be translated into third-person accounts, they cannot be reduced to them."^^xsd:string;
bibo:authorList ;
bibo:issue "2";
bibo:status ,
;
bibo:volume "16";
dct:creator ;
dct:date "1993";
dct:isPartOf ,
;
dct:publisher ;
dct:subject ,
,
;
dct:title "Consciousness, Causality and Complementarity"^^xsd:string;
ep:hasDocument ,
;
rdf:type bibo:Article,
ep:EPrint,
ep:JournalpEPrint;
rdfs:seeAlso .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Behavioral Neuroscience" .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Cognitive Psychology" .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Neuroendocrinology" .
foaf:name "Cambridge University Press"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type foaf:Organization .
foaf:familyName "Velmans"^^xsd:string;
foaf:givenName "Max"^^xsd:string;
foaf:name "Max Velmans"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type foaf:Person .
foaf:name "Behavioral and Brain Sciences"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type bibo:Collection .