--- abstract: 'This paper supports the view that the ongoing shift from orthodox to embodied-embedded cognitive science has been significantly influenced by the experimental results generated by AI research. Recently, there has also been a noticeable shift toward enactivism, a paradigm which radicalizes the embodied-embedded approach by placing autonomous agency and lived subjectivity at the heart of cognitive science. Some first steps toward a clarification of the relationship of AI to this further shift are outlined. It is concluded that the success of enactivism in establishing itself as a mainstream cognitive science research program will depend less on progress made in AI research and more on the development of a phenomenological pragmatics.' altloc: [] chapter: ~ commentary: ~ commref: ~ confdates: ~ conference: ~ confloc: ~ contact_email: ~ creators_id: - t.froese@gmail.com creators_name: - family: Froese given: Tom honourific: Mr lineage: '' date: 2007 date_type: published datestamp: 2007-10-22 10:41:58 department: ~ dir: disk0/00/00/57/78 edit_lock_since: ~ edit_lock_until: ~ edit_lock_user: ~ editors_id: [] editors_name: - family: Lungarella given: M honourific: Mr lineage: '' eprint_status: archive eprintid: 5778 fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/5778/1/Froese2007.pdf full_text_status: public importid: ~ institution: ~ isbn: ~ ispublished: inpress issn: ~ item_issues_comment: [] item_issues_count: 0 item_issues_description: [] item_issues_id: [] item_issues_reported_by: [] item_issues_resolved_by: [] item_issues_status: [] item_issues_timestamp: [] item_issues_type: [] keywords: 'AI, cognitive science, paradigm shift, enactivism, phenomenology' lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:56:59 latitude: ~ longitude: ~ metadata_visibility: show note: ~ number: ~ pagerange: 63-75 pubdom: TRUE publication: 50 Years of AI publisher: Springer-Verlag refereed: TRUE referencetext: "Anderson, M.L. (2003), “Embodied Cognition: A field guide”, Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), pp. 91-130\r\nBeer, R.D. (1995), “A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction”, Artificial Intelligence, 72(1-2), pp. 173-215\r\nBeer, R.D. (2000), “Dynamical approaches to cognitive science”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(3), pp. 91-99\r\nBoden, M.A. (2006), Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science, 2 vols., Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press\r\nBrooks, R.A. (1991), “Intelligence without representation”, Artificial Intelligence, 47(1-3), pp. 139-160\r\nBrooks, R.A. (1997), “From earwigs to humans”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 20(2-4), pp. 291-304\r\nClark, A. (1997), Being There, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press\r\nDi Paolo, E.A. (2003), “Organismically-inspired robotics: homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop”, in: K. Murase & T. Asakura (eds.), Dynamical Systems Approach to Embodiment and Sociality, Adelaide, Australia: Advanced Knowledge International, pp. 19-42\r\nDi Paolo, E.A., Noble, J. & Bullock, S. (2000), “Simulation Models as Opaque Thought Experiments”, in: M.A. Bedau et al. (eds.), Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 497-506\r\nDi Paolo, E.A., Rohde, M. & De Jaegher, H. (2007), “Horizons for the Enactive Mind: Values, Social Interaction, and Play”, Cognitive Science Research Paper, 587, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK\r\nDreyfus, H.L. (1991), Being-in-the-World, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press\r\nDreyfus, H.L. (2007), “Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian”, Philosophical Psychology, 20(2), pp. 247-268\r\nDreyfus, H.L. & Dreyfus, S.E. (1988), “Making a mind versus modelling the brain: artificial intelligence back at a branch-point”, Daedalus¸ 117(1), p. 15-44\r\nFodor, J.A. (1975), The Language of Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni. Press\r\nFroese, T., Virgo, N. & Izquierdo, E. (2007), “Autonomy: a review and a reappraisal”, in: F. Almeida e Costa et al. (eds.), Proc. of the 9th Euro. Conf. on Artificial Life, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, in press\r\nGallagher, S. (2005), How the Body Shapes the Mind, New York, NY: Oxford University Press\r\nHanna, R. & Thompson, E. (2003), “The Mind-Body-Body Problem”, Theoria et Historia Scientarum, 7(1), pp. 24-44\r\nHarnard, S. (1990), “The symbol grounding problem”, Physica D, 42, pp. 335-346\r\nHarvey, I. (2004), “Homeostasis and Rein Control: From Daisyworld to Active Perception”, in: J. Pollack et al. (eds.), Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 309-314\r\nHarvey, I., Di Paolo, E.A., Wood, R., Quinn, M. & Tuci, E. A. (2005), ‘Evolutionary Robotics: A new scientific tool for studying cognition’, Artificial Life, 11(1-2), pp. 79-98\r\nIizuka, H. & Di Paolo, E.A. (forthcoming), “Toward Spinozist robotics: Exploring the minimal dynamics of behavioral preference”, Adaptive Behavior\r\nIkegami, T. & Suzuki, K. (forthcoming), “From Homeostatic to Homeodynamic Self”, BioSystems\r\nJonas, H. (1966), The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology, Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 2001\r\nLevine, J. (1983), “Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, pp. 354-361\r\nMaturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J. (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers\r\nMcCarthy, J. & Hayes, P.J. (1969), “Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence”, in: B. Meltzer & D. Michie (eds.), Machine Intelligence 4, Edinburgh, UK: Edinburg University Press, pp. 463-502\r\nMcClelland, J.L., Rumelhart, D.E. & the PDP Research Group (1986), Parallel Distributed Processing. Vol. 2: Psychological and Biological Models, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press\r\nNewell, A. & Simon, H.A. (1976), “Computer Science as Empirical Enquiry: Symbols and Search”, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 19(3), pp. 113-126\r\nNoë, A. (2004), Action in Perception, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press\r\nNolfi, S. & Floreano, D. (2000), Evolutionary Robotics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press\r\nPfeifer, R. (1996), “Building ‘Fungus Eaters’: Design Principles of Autonomous Agents”, in: P. Maes et al. (eds.), Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, p. 3-12\r\nPfeifer, R. & Scheier, C. (1999), Understanding Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press\r\nThompson, E. (2005), “Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), pp. 407-427\r\nThompson, E. (2007), Mind in Life, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press\r\nThompson, E. & Varela, F.J. (2001), “Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(10), pp. 418-425\r\nTorrance, S. (2005), “In search of the enactive: Introduction to special issue on enactive experience”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), pp. 357-368\r\nvan Gelder, T. (1998), “The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(5), pp. 615-665\r\nVarela, F.J. (1976), “Not One, Not Two”, The Co-Evolution Quarterly, 12, pp. 62-67\r\nVarela, F.J. & Shear, J. (1999), ‘First-person Methodologies: What, Why, How?’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(2-3), pp. 1-14\r\nVarela, F.J, Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press\r\nWeber, A. & Varela, F.J. (2002), “Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, pp. 97-125\r\nWheeler, M. (2005), Reconstructing the Cognitive World, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press\r\nZiemke, T. (2007), “What’s life got to do with it?”, in: A. Chella & R. Manzotti (eds.), Artificial Consciousness, Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, pp. 48-66" relation_type: [] relation_uri: [] reportno: ~ rev_number: 28 series: ~ source: ~ status_changed: 2007-10-22 10:41:56 subjects: - phil-mind - phil-sci - comp-sci-art-intel succeeds: ~ suggestions: ~ sword_depositor: ~ sword_slug: ~ thesistype: ~ title: On the Role of AI in the Ongoing Paradigm Shift within the Cognitive Sciences type: bookchapter userid: 7313 volume: ~