--- abstract: 'This research examined the precision of the pCI rule through three experiments. The results show that first , the tendency of the subjects’ casual judgments was basically similar to the pCI rule. But (a + d) / n predicted human’s casual judgments were even better; second, the increase of subjects’ casual judgments was milder than the pCI rule, and the subjects needed time to construct their own way of judging relationship; finally, different people had different ways of causal judgments, and could be grouped into some categories.' altloc: [] chapter: ~ commentary: ~ commref: ~ confdates: ~ conference: ~ confloc: ~ contact_email: ~ creators_id: [] creators_name: - family: Shao given: Z. F. honourific: '' lineage: '' - family: Wang given: J. honourific: '' lineage: '' date: 2005 date_type: published datestamp: 2007-08-20 department: ~ dir: disk0/00/00/56/61 edit_lock_since: ~ edit_lock_until: ~ edit_lock_user: ~ editors_id: [] editors_name: [] eprint_status: archive eprintid: 5661 fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/5661/1/An_Experimental_Research_on_the_pCI_Rule_and_Causal_Judgment.pdf full_text_status: public importid: ~ institution: ~ isbn: ~ ispublished: pub issn: ~ item_issues_comment: [] item_issues_count: 0 item_issues_description: [] item_issues_id: [] item_issues_reported_by: [] item_issues_resolved_by: [] item_issues_status: [] item_issues_timestamp: [] item_issues_type: [] keywords: 'causal power, pCI, style of causal judgment' lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:56:56 latitude: ~ longitude: ~ metadata_visibility: show note: ~ number: ~ pagerange: ' 946-948' pubdom: FALSE publication: Psychological Science publisher: ~ refereed: FALSE referencetext: ~ relation_type: [] relation_uri: [] reportno: ~ rev_number: 8 series: ~ source: ~ status_changed: 2007-09-12 17:11:21 subjects: - cog-psy succeeds: ~ suggestions: ~ sword_depositor: ~ sword_slug: ~ thesistype: ~ title: An Experimental Research on the pCI Rule and Causal Judgment (in Chinese) type: journalp userid: 542 volume: 28