@prefix epid: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix geo: .
@prefix bibo: .
@prefix epx: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix void: .
@prefix event: .
@prefix skos: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix cc: .
@prefix ep: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix eprel: .
@prefix dct: .
<>
foaf:primaryTopic ;
rdfs:comment "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "lril-07-full_paper_samir_karmakar.pdf"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "preview.png"^^xsd:string .
rdfs:label "indexcodes.txt"^^xsd:string .
dc:format "text/html";
dc:title "HTML Summary of #5455 \n\nDesigning Domain Ontology: A Study in Lexical Semantics\n\n";
foaf:primaryTopic .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:hasIndexCodesVersion ;
eprel:hasVersion ,
;
eprel:hasVolatileVersion ,
;
eprel:haspreviewThumbnailVersion ;
rdf:type bibo:Document,
ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Designing Domain Ontology: A Study in Lexical Semantics (PDF)"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
eprel:ispreviewThumbnailVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Designing Domain Ontology: A Study in Lexical Semantics (Image (PNG))"^^xsd:string .
dct:hasPart ;
ep:hasFile ;
eprel:isIndexCodesVersionOf ;
eprel:isVersionOf ;
eprel:isVolatileVersionOf ;
rdf:type ep:Document;
rdfs:label "Designing Domain Ontology: A Study in Lexical Semantics (Indexer Terms)"^^xsd:string .
rdf:_1 .
bibo:abstract "Preparing a multi-purpose lexicon requires a systematic analysis of inter-conceptual relations. These relations are of two types, namely (i) syntactic and (ii) semantic, which can further be decomposed to capture the greater explanatory adequacy. But the exploration of the lexical structure becomes intricate because of the hidden dynamics of the context; since traditionally, language has been viewed as a totality of lexicon and computation system, and major emphasis has been given to the designing of the computational system, considering the designing of the lexicon internal domain ontology as a mere metaphysical game, when in reality it is a serious epistemic concern, because of having the capacity of licensing inferences. Therefore a lexical level representation should have enough scope to incorporate the contextual information. \n\nDesigning domain ontology is important since it tells us about the conceptual constellation within the coherent whole of which the related terms are meaningful. Isolating a term from the corresponding constellation will results into the evaporation of meaning. Furthermore it provides the basis, upon which the entire linguistic structure rests. If so, then how is it possible to construct a lexicon, by divorcing the ontological issues? And at the same time, ontology by itself is not enough, again because of the reason that the higher order typifications of those (grounded) concepts and their corresponding interrelations among the types ultimately results into the consequent super-ordinating levels, containing the syntactic information pertinent to a symbol manipulating system. \n \n\nIn this paper I would show that the representation of a lexical structure, should include both kind of information which are pertinent to the closed class and as well as the open class semantics, on the basis of examples, cited from English and Bengali.\n"^^xsd:string;
bibo:authorList ;
bibo:status ;
dct:creator ;
dct:date "2007";
dct:isPartOf ;
dct:subject ,
,
,
;
dct:title "Designing Domain Ontology: A Study in Lexical Semantics"^^xsd:string;
ep:hasDocument ,
,
;
rdf:type bibo:Article,
ep:EPrint,
ep:PreprintEPrint;
rdfs:seeAlso .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Language" .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Computational Linguistics" .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Semantics" .
rdf:type skos:Concept;
skos:prefLabel "Philosophy of Language" .
foaf:familyName "Karmakar"^^xsd:string;
foaf:givenName "Samir"^^xsd:string;
foaf:name "Samir Karmakar"^^xsd:string;
rdf:type foaf:Person .