?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=Does+the+Need+for+Agreement+Among+Reviewers+Inhibit+the+Publication+of+Controversial+Findings%3F&rft.creator=Armstrong%2C+J.+Scott&rft.creator=Hubbard%2C+Raymond&rft.subject=Behavioral+Neuroscience&rft.description=As+Cicchetti+indicates%2C+agreement+among+reviewers+is+not+high.+This+conclusion+is+empirically+supported+by+Fiske+and+Fogg+(1990)%2C+who+reported+that+two+independent+reviews+of+the+same+papers+typically+had+no+critical+point+in+common.+Does+this+imply+that+journal+editors+should+strive+for+a+high+level+of+reviewer+consensus+as+a+criterion+for+publication%3F+Prior+research+suggests+that+such+a+requirement+would+inhibit+the+publication+of+papers+with+controversial+findings.+We+summarize+this+research+and+report+on+a+survey+of+editors.&rft.date=1991&rft.type=Journal+(Paginated)&rft.type=NonPeerReviewed&rft.format=application%2Fpdf&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F5182%2F1%2Fdoes_the_need_for_agreement.pdf&rft.identifier=++Armstrong%2C+J.+Scott+and+Hubbard%2C+Raymond++(1991)+Does+the+Need+for+Agreement+Among+Reviewers+Inhibit+the+Publication+of+Controversial+Findings%3F++%5BJournal+(Paginated)%5D+++++&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F5182%2F