<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument?</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Stevan</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Harnad</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Searle's Chinese Room Argument showed a fatal flaw in computationalism
                               (the idea that mental states are just computational states) and helped usher in
                               the era of situated robotics and symbol grounding (although Searle himself
                               thought neuroscience was the only correct way to understand the mind).</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Cognitive Psychology</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Philosophy of Mind</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Artificial Intelligence</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Robotics</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2001</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Oxford University Press</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Book Chapter</mods:genre></mods:mods>