--- abstract: This review tries to give overview of key issues of Bennett and Hacker's neurophilosophy and theoretical physiology attempt and to estimate possibilities of that neurophilosophy to be accepted by real neuro and life sciences. altloc: - http://biomedicum.ut.ee/~andress/inglise/papers/on%20bennett%20hacker.htm chapter: ~ commentary: ~ commref: 'Max R. Bennett and Peter M. S. Hacker, Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Blackwell Publishing (2003)' confdates: ~ conference: ~ confloc: ~ contact_email: ~ creators_id: [] creators_name: - family: Soosaar given: Andres honourific: '' lineage: '' date: 2004 date_type: published datestamp: 2004-07-30 department: ~ dir: disk0/00/00/37/28 edit_lock_since: ~ edit_lock_until: ~ edit_lock_user: ~ editors_id: [] editors_name: [] eprint_status: archive eprintid: 3728 fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_html.png;/3728/1/bennett_hacker_on_neuroscience.htm full_text_status: public importid: ~ institution: ~ isbn: ~ ispublished: unpub issn: ~ item_issues_comment: [] item_issues_count: 0 item_issues_description: [] item_issues_id: [] item_issues_reported_by: [] item_issues_resolved_by: [] item_issues_status: [] item_issues_timestamp: [] item_issues_type: [] keywords: 'neurophilosophy, the mind-body problem, the organism-organ problem, cognitive functions' lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:55:38 latitude: ~ longitude: ~ metadata_visibility: show note: ~ number: ~ pagerange: ~ pubdom: FALSE publication: ~ publisher: ~ refereed: TRUE referencetext: ~ relation_type: [] relation_uri: [] reportno: ~ rev_number: 8 series: ~ source: ~ status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:53:06 subjects: - phil-sci succeeds: ~ suggestions: 'This review was sent to Philosophy of Science journal but rejected by external reviewer as too long and not in good agreement with some philosophical doctrines. ' sword_depositor: ~ sword_slug: ~ thesistype: ~ title: "Review of Bennett and Hacker, Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience\n\n" type: other userid: 1596 volume: ~