creators_name: Vinson, Norman G.
creators_name: Singer, Janice A.
type: newsarticle
datestamp: 2004-07-30
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:55:38
metadata_visibility: show
title: Consent Issues Raised by Observational Research in Organisations
ispublished: pub
subjects: phil-ethics
full_text_status: public
keywords: human subjects research ethics, employees, workplace, observation, participant-observer
note: Ethical issues related to consent raised by performing observational research in the workplace.
abstract: none
date: 2004
date_type: published
publication: NCEHR Communiqué
volume: 12
number: 2
pagerange: 35-36
refereed: FALSE
referencetext: Mirvis, P, & Seashore, S. (1982). Creating ethical relationships in organizational research. In J. Sieber (Ed.), The ethics of social research, surveys and experiments (pp. 79-104). Springer Verlag: New York.

Nardi, B. (1997). The use of ethnographic methods in design and evaluation. In M. Helander, T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), The handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 361-366). Elsevier: Netherlands.

Palys, S. (1997). Bulldozers in the garden: Comments regarding the Tri-Council working groups’ July 1997 draft. Available at: http://www.sfu.ca/~palys/tcwg97.htm.

Sieber, J. (2001). Protecting research subjects, employees and researchers: Implications for software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering, 6(4), 329-341.

Singer, J., Vinson, N. (Eds.) (2001). Special issue on ethics. Empirical Software Engineering, 6(4).

Singer, J & Vinson, N. (2002). Ethical issues in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(12), 1171-1180.
 
citation:   Vinson, Norman G. and Singer, Janice A.  (2004) Consent Issues Raised by Observational Research in Organisations.  [Newspaper/Magazine Article]     
document_url: http://cogprints.org/3722/1/NRC-46561.pdf