"3579","Taking the trivial doctrine seriously: Functionalism, eliminativism, and materialism ","Gold & Stoljar's characterization of the trivial doctrine and of its relationships with the radical one misses some differences that may be crucial. The radical doctrine can be read as a derivative of the computational version of functionalism that provides the backbone of current cognitive science and is fundamentally uninterested in biology: both doctrines are fundamentally wrong. The synthesis between neurobiology and psychology requires instead that minds be viewed as ontologically primitive, that is, as material properties of functioning bodies. G&S's characterization of the trivial doctrine should therefore be correspondingly modified. ","http://cogprints.org/3579/","Tirassa, Maurizio","UNSPECIFIED","       <span class=\"person_name\">Tirassa, Maurizio</span>     (1999)  <a href=\"http://cogprints.org/3579/\"><em>Taking the trivial doctrine seriously: Functionalism, eliminativism, and materialism.</em></a>       [Journal (Paginated)]           ","","1999"