?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=Psychosemantic+analyticity&rft.creator=Horsey%2C+Richard&rft.subject=Philosophy+of+Mind&rft.subject=Logic&rft.subject=Pragmatics&rft.description=It+is+widely+agreed+that+the+content+of+a+logical+concept+such+as+and+is+constituted+by+the+inferences+it+enters+into.+I+argue+that+it+is+impossible+to+draw+a+principled+distinction+between+logical+and+non-logical+concepts%2C+and+hence+that+the+content+of+non-logical+concepts+can+also+be+constituted+by+certain+of+their+inferential+relations.%0A%0AThe+traditional+problem+with+such+a+view+has+been+that%2C+given+Quine%E2%80%99s+arguments+against+the+analytic-synthetic+distinction%2C+there+does+not+seem+to+be+any+way+to+distinguish+between+those+inferences+that+are+content+constitutive+and+those+that+are+not.+I+propose+that+such+a+distinction+can+be+drawn+by+appealing+to+a+notion+of+%E2%80%98psychosemantic+analyticity%E2%80%99.+This+approach+is+immune+to+Quine%E2%80%99s+arguments%2C+since+%E2%80%98psychosemantic+analyticity%E2%80%99+is+a+psychological+property%2C+and+it+is+thus+an+empirical+question+which+inferences+have+this+property.%0A%0A&rft.date=2001-09&rft.type=Journal+(On-line%2FUnpaginated)&rft.type=NonPeerReviewed&rft.format=application%2Fpdf&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F3254%2F1%2Fanalytic.pdf&rft.identifier=++Horsey%2C+Richard++(2001)+Psychosemantic+analyticity.++%5BJournal+(On-line%2FUnpaginated)%5D+++++&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F3254%2F