%A Dr Siu L. Chow
%J Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
%T Auotmatic detection, consistent mapping, and training
%X Results from two experiments showed that a flat display?size function was found under the consistent mapping (CM) condition despite the facts that there was no extensive CM training and that the stimulus?response (S?R) consistency was only an intrasession manipulation. A confounding factor might be responsible for the fact that the consistent and the varied S?R mapping conditions gave rise to different display?size functions in Schneider and Shiffrin's (1977) study. Their claim that automatic detection and controlled search are qualitatively different is also discussed.
%N 6
%K Automaticity, attention, S-R mapping, display-size function
%P 431-434
%V 24
%D 1986
%I Psychonomic Society
%L cogprints2959

<script src="//archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js"></script>