@misc{cogprints2187,
          volume = {13},
          number = {3},
           title = {Iconic store and partial report},
          author = {Siu Chow},
            year = {1985},
           pages = {256--264},
         journal = {Memory \& Cognition},
        keywords = {Iconic store, partial report, information persistence},
             url = {http://cogprints.org/2187/},
        abstract = {The iconic store has recently been challenged on the grounds that data in its favor may have resulted from some procedural artifacts. The display-instruction compatibility and perceptual grouping hypotheses were reexamined in two experiments with the partial-report paradigm. When care was taken to rectify some procedural problems found in Merikle's (1980) study, it was established that the iconic store (as a hypothetical mechanism) can still be validly entertained. This report demonstrates one important procedural point in studying the iconic store with the partial-report task, namely, that subjects must be given more than token training on the partial-report task.}
}

<script src='//archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js'></script>