@misc{cogprints1718,
          volume = {46},
          number = {1/2},
          author = {D. W. Zaidel and A. Kosta},
           title = {Hemispheric effects of canonical views of category members with known typicality levels},
       publisher = {Academic Press},
         journal = {Brain and Cognition},
           pages = {311--316},
            year = {2001},
        keywords = {typical, prototypical, prototypicality, prototype, exemplar, instance, superordinate categories, mental distance, conceptual organization, concepts, hemispheric specialization, laterality, cerebral dominance, priming, brain, man made, natural objects, left hemisphere, right hemisphere, hemi-field, latency, reaction time, perspective view, 3-D, vision, visual.},
             url = {http://cogprints.org/1718/},
        abstract = {Is there a preferred hemispheric canonical view of a visual concept? We investigated this question in a natural superordinate category membership decision task using a hemi-field paradigm. Participants had to decide whether or not an image of an object lateralized in the left (LVF) or right (RVF) visual half field is a member of a predesignated superordinate category. The objects represented high, medium, or low typicality levels, and each object had 6 different perspective views (front, front-right, front-left, side, back-left, and back-right).  The latency responses revealed a significant interaction of Hemi Field X View X Typicality (there was no hemi-field difference in accuracy).  The findings confirm the presence of asymmetry in stored concepts in long-term memory and suggest, in addition, a hemispheric canonical view of these concepts, a view strongly related to typicality level.}
}

<script src="//archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js"></script>