Cogprints

Do we have Independent Visual Streams for Perception and Action? a Response.

Locklin, Mr. Jason and Danckert, Dr. James (2010) Do we have Independent Visual Streams for Perception and Action? a Response. [Preprint]

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF (Brief Commentary)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

84Kb

Abstract

Schenk and McIntosh (2009) present the thesis that most visual behaviours, especially those of any significant complexity, are likely to involve collaboration between both visual streams. While very likely true, this statement does not contradict the perception-action model as proposed by Milner and Goodale (1995, 2006). The two visual system hypothesis implies two functionally specialized systems, and not, as Schenk and McIntosh propose, two behaviourally independent systems.

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:Perception and Action, Visualmotor control, Stroke.
Subjects:Neuroscience > Behavioral Neuroscience
ID Code:6821
Deposited By:Locklin, Mr. Jason
Deposited On:04 May 2010 23:05
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

Available Versions of this Item

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Carey, D. P., Harvey, M., and Milner, A. D. (1996).

Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a

patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia,

34(5):329–337.

Dijkerman, H. C. and Milner, A. D. (1998). The per-

ception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth

plane. ii. dissociated orientation functions in normal subjects.

Exp Brain Res, 118(3):408–414.

Dijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D., and Carey, D. P. (1996).

The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth

plane. i. effects of visual form agnosia. Exp Brain

Res, 112(3):442–451.

Dijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D., and Carey, D. P. (1998).

Grasping spatial relationships: failure to demonstrate allocentric

visual coding in a patient with visual form

agnosia. Conscious Cogn, 7(3):424–437.

Dijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D., and Carey, D. P. (1999).

Motion parallax enables depth processing for action in a visual

form agnosic when binocular vision is unavail-

able. Neuropsychologia, 37(13):1505–1510.

Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., Milner, A. D., Perrett,

D. I., Benson, P. J., and Hietanen, J. K. (1994). The

nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing

supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1):46–56.

Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., and

Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation be-

tween perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature,

349(6305):154–6. 0028-0836 (Print) Journal Article

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t.

McIntosh, R. D., Dijkerman, H. C., Mon-Williams, M.,

and Milner, A. D. (2004). Grasping what is gras-

pable: evidence from visual form agnosia. Cortex,

40(4-5):695–702.

Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A. (1995). The Visual

Brain in Action. Oxford University Press, USA.

Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A. (2006). The Visual

Brain in Action Second edition. Oxford University

Press, USA.

Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A. (2006). The Visual

Brain in Action Second edition. Oxford University

Press, USA.

Mon-Williams, M., McIntosh, R. D., and Milner, A. D.

(2001a). Vertical gaze angle as a distance cue for pro-

gramming reaching: insights from visual form agnosia

ii (of iii). Exp Brain Res, 139(2):137–142.

Mon-Williams, M., Tresilian, J. R., McIntosh, R. D., and

Milner, A. D. (2001b). Monocular and binocular dis-

tance cues: insights from visual form agnosia i (of iii).

Exp Brain Res, 139(2):127–136.

Schenk, T. and McIntosh, R. (2009). Do we have indepen-

dent visual streams for perception and action? Cogni-

tive Neuroscience, 1(1):1–15.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page