Cogprints
Login | Create Account

A characterization of the one-sidedness fallacy within the framework of the cognitive distortions

Franceschi, Dr Paul (2009) A characterization of the one-sidedness fallacy within the framework of the cognitive distortions. [Preprint]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF (A characterization of the one-sidedness fallacy within the framework of the cognitive distortions) - Draft Version
175Kb

Abstract

In this paper, I propose an accurate description of the cognitive process involved in the one-sidedness fallacy, a widespread type of fallacy. I describe first several characterizations of the one-sidedness fallacy, that are either inductive or deductive, or occurring at a meta-philosophical level. I recall, second, the framework of the cognitive distortions described in Franceschi (2007). I give then a definition of the one-sidedness fallacy, by describing it as a general cognitive distortion: the disqualification of one pole. I show finally how the one-sidedness fallacy distinguishes itself from the confirmation bias.

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:one-sidedness fallacy, cognitive distortion, confirmation bias
Subjects:Philosophy > Logic
Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
ID Code:6547
Deposited By:Franceschi, Paul
Deposited On:02 Jul 2009 02:52
Last Modified:02 Jul 2009 02:52

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Bacon, F. (1939). Novum organum. Dans Burtt, E. A. (Ed.). The English philosophers from Bacon to Mill (pp. 24-123). New York: Random House. Original publication in 1620.

Boulanger, P. (2000). Culture et nature. Pour la Science, 273, 3.

Chalmers, D. (2002). The St. Petersburg two-envelope paradox. Analysis, 62, 155-157.

Dietl, P. (1973). The Surprise Examination. Educational Theory, 23, 153-158.

Franceschi, P. (2005). Une analyse dichotomique du paradoxe de l’examen-surprise. Philosophiques; 32-2, 399-421.

Franceschi, P. (2007). Compléments pour une théorie des distorsions cognitives. Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive, 17-2, 84-88. Preprint in English: http://www.cogprints.org/5261/

Hall, N. (1999). How to Set a Surprise Exam. Mind, 108, 647-703.

Nickerson, R. S. (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2-2 , 175-220.

Quine, W.V.O. (1953). On a So-called Paradox. Mind, 62, 65-66.

Smith, J. W. (1984). The surprise examination on the paradox of the heap. Philosophical Papers, 13, 43-56.

Stuart Mill, John (1859). On Liberty, London. Original publication in 1859.

Suber, E. (1998) The One-Sidedness Fallacy. Manuscript, http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/courses/inflogic/onesided.htm.

Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. London & New York : Routledge.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.