Cogprints

Consultations of health service providers amongst patients of pulmonary tuberculosis from an urban area

Pardeshi, Geeta S (2008) Consultations of health service providers amongst patients of pulmonary tuberculosis from an urban area. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
145Kb

Abstract

Aims: To describe the number, types and reasons of consultations amongst patients of pulmonary tuberculosis from an urban area. Settings and Design Cross sectional study was conducted amongst new patients of pulmonary tuberculosis initiated on DOTS at District Tuberculosis Centre (DTC), Yavatmal from January to June 2006. Material and Methods: The data regarding consultations were collected along a time line. The reasons for consultations were studied by in-depth interviews. Statistical analysis: Logistic regression analysis and transcripts of interviews. Results and Conclusions A total of 55 patients were studied in whom median duration between first consultation to treatment initiation was 15 days. A majority of cases (87.27%) had first consulted a private practitioner. A total of 32 patients reported more than two consultations and 19 had consulted more than two private health service providers. Amongst the movements between consultations, a majority were from private to government. Only four patients had come to DTC without any prior consultation. Many patients came to government health service provider on their own when the symptomatic treatment prescribed by the private practitioners did not relieve their symptoms

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:RNTCP, DOTS, Treatment seeking, Private health service providers
Subjects:JOURNALS > Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences
ID Code:6302
Deposited By:Kakkilaya Bevinje, Dr. Srinivas
Deposited On:17 Dec 2008 22:11
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Dhingra VK, Rajpal S, Taneja DK et al. Health care seeking pattern of tuberculosis patients attending an urban TB clinic in Delhi. J Commun Dis. 2002 Sep;34(3):185-92.

2. Rajeswari R, Chandrasekaran V, Suhadev M et al. Factors associated with patient and health system delays in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in South India. International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002 Sep;6(9):789-95.

3. Tobgay KJ, Sarma PS, Thankappan KR. Predictors of treatment delays for tuberculosis in Sikkim. : Natl Med J India. 2006 Mar-Apr;19(2):60-3.

4. Selvam JM, Wares F, Perumal M et al. Health-seeking behaviour of new smear-positive TB patients under a DOTS programme in Tamil Nadu, India, 2003. International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Feb;11(2):161-7.

5. Tobgay KJ. Health seeking behaviour and delays in diagnosis and treatment in patients reporting with cough of three weeks or more to tuberculosis units & microscopy centres in east Sikkim. Working Paper No. 6 Achutha Menon centre for health science studies. Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology. July 2004.

6. Juvekar SK, Morankar SN, Dalai DB et al. A social and operational determinants of patient behaviour in lung tuberculosis. Ind. J. Tub. 1995;42:87-94

7. Uplekar MW, Rangan S. Private doctors and tuberculosis control in India. Tuber Lung Dis. 1993 Oct;74(5):332-7.

8. Uplekar M, Pathania V, Raviglione M. Private practitioners and public health: Weak links in tuberculosis control. Lancet 2001;358(9285):912-6.

9. Brown P. Private doctors must improve their treatment of tuberculosis, says WHO. BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1320.

10. Grover NK. Role of private practitioners in tuberculosis control in India. Journal of the Indian Medical Association 1996;94:370-71.

11. Dewan PK, Lal SS, Lonnroth K et al.Improving tuberculosis control through public-private collaboration in India: literature review. BMJ. 2006 Mar 11;332(7541):574-8.

12. Arora VK, Sarin R, Lönnroth K.Feasibility and effectiveness of a public-private mix project for improved TB control in Delhi, India . International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Dec;7(12):1131-8.

13. Ambe G, Lönnroth K, Dholakia Y et al. Every provider counts: effect of a comprehensive public-private mix approach for TB control in a large metropolitan area in India. International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 May;9(5):562-8.

14. Murthy KJ, Frieden TR, Yazdani A at al. Public-private partnership in tuberculosis control: experience in Hyderabad, India. International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Apr;5(4):354-9.

15. Sehgal S, Dewan PK, Chauhan LS et al. Public-private mix TB activities in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, North India: Delivering DOTS via collaboration with private providers and non-governmental organizations. Indian J Tuberc. 2007 Apr;54(2):79-83.

16. Balasubramanian R, Garg R, Santha T et al.Gender disparities in tuberculosis: report from a rural DOTS programme in south India . . International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004 Mar;8(3):323-32.

17. Krishnan A, Kapoor SK. Involvement of private practitioners in tuberculosis control in Ballabgarh, Northern India. International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006 Mar;10(3):264-9.

18. Floyd K, Arora VK, Murthy KJR et al. Cost and cost-effectiveness of public and private sector collaboration in tuberculosis control: evidence from India. Bulletin of WHO 2006;84:437-45.

19. Cost and cost-effectiveness of public-private mix DOTS:evidence form two pilot projects in India. Geneva: WHO; 2004.

20. Pantoja A, Lal SS, Lonnroth K et al. Cost and cost-effectiveness of scaled-up and intensive PPM DOTS in Bangalore. International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10:S28.

21. Involvement of non-governmental organizations in the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme. Delhi: Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2001.

22. Involvement of private practitioners in the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme. Delhi: Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2002.

23. Prasad R, Nautiyal RG, Mukherji PK, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary tuberculosis: what do doctors of modern medicine do in India? International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Jan;7(1):52-7.

24. Prasad R, Nautiyal RG, Mukherji PK et al. Treatment of new pulmonary tuberculosis patients: what do allopathic doctors do in India? International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002 Oct;6(10):895-902.

25. Greaves F, Ouyang H, Pefole M et al. Compliance with DOTS diagnosis and treatment recommendations by private practitioners in Kerala, India. International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Jan;11(1):110-2.

26. Sharma N, Taneja DK, Pagare D et al. The impact of an IEC campaign on tuberculosis awareness and health seeking behaviour in Delhi, India. International J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Nov;9(11):1259-65.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page