Cogprints

A Thing Is What We Say It Is: Referential Communication and Indirect Category Learning

Voiklis, John (2008) A Thing Is What We Say It Is: Referential Communication and Indirect Category Learning. [Thesis]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

4Mb

Abstract

This study investigates the interaction of referential communication and the structure of perceptual features on the joint processes of inventing a referential lexicon for novel objects and discovering the functional significance of those objects during an indirect category learning activity. During the learning task, participants worked either individually or as cooperative dyads to learn four combinations of orthogonal functional features--nutritive vs. not nutritive and destructive vs. not destructive--that defined four categories of fictional extra-terrestrial creatures. These categories were not specifically identified or labeled; rather, participants had to infer them indirectly as they predicted the functions. Also, these functionally defined categories exhibited a complex perceptual structure: a unidimensional (simple) rule predicted one function, while a family resemblance (complex) sub-structure predicted the other function. The function-learning task yielded function prediction data. In addition, each learner worked individually to sort the creatures (pre- and post-function learning) and to predict their functions in an individual function prediction posttest that also yielded selective attention data. Together, the prediction data, sort data, and selective attention data supported three a priori hypotheses. Referential communication generates conceptual homogeneity (H3) and enhances indirect category learning (H1), though simple rules are learned earlier and better than complex relationships (H2). In explaining the learning advantages observed among dyadic learners, I argue that referential communication may highlight attention to relationships between features (perceptual and functional) and actions as well as render such relationships more memorable. Moreover, communication may foster greater motivation among collaborators and may allow them to take advantage of the differing expectations and heuristics each collaborator brings to the task. In explaining the simplicity advantages observed among dyadic learners, I argue that referential communication may provide explicit "rules" for otherwise implicit (and perhaps more difficult) judgements. Dyads appear to have established reference to simple rules earlier than they established reference to complex rules; thus, they could explicitly (and perhaps more easily) learn the simple rule earlier than the complex rule. Finally, in explaining the conceptual homogeneity between and within dyads, I consider whether communication pushes "public" conceptualizations and publicly-formed "private" conceptualizations towards a limited range of widely shareable conceptual structures.

Item Type:Thesis
Keywords:communication language-games categorization decision-making coordination joint-action
Subjects:Psychology > Social Psychology
Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
Psychology > Psycholinguistics
ID Code:6286
Deposited By:Voiklis, John
Deposited On:04 Dec 2008 17:41
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Allen, S. W., & Brooks, L. R. (1991). Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120(1), 3-19.

Anderson, J. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 93(3), 409-429.

Atran, S. (2005). Adaptationism for Human Cognition: Strong, Spurious or Weak? Mind & Language, 20(1), 39-67.

Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. (2004). Evolution and Devolution of Knowledge: A Tale of Two Biologies. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 10(2), 395-421.

Austin, J. L. (1976). How to Do Things with Words: Oxford University Press.

Balaban, M. T., & Waxman, S. R. (1997). Do Words Facilitate Object Categorization in 9-Month-Old Infants? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64(1), 3-26

Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants' Contribution to the Achievement of Joint Reference. Child Development, 62(5), 875-890.

Bangerter, A., & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27(2), 195-225.

Barr, D. J., & Kronmüller, E. (2006). Conversation as a Site of Category Learning and Category Use. In A. B. Markman & B. H. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Categories in Use (Vol. 47, pp. 181-211): Elsevier.

Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(1), 107-154.

Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211-227.

Barsalou, L. W., & Sewell, D. R. (1984). Constructing representations of categories from different points of view: Emory Cognition Project, Emory Universityo. Document Number)

Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2008). The Limits of Counting: Numerical Cognition Between Evolution and Culture. Science, 319(5860), 213-215.

Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., & Raven, P. H. (1966). Folk Taxonomies and Biological Classification. Science, 154(3746), 273-275.

Bloom, P. (2002). Mindreading, Communication and the Learning of Names for Things. Mind & Language, 17(1 \& 2), 37-54.

Blume, A., Dejong, D. V., Kim, Y. G., & Sprinkle, G. B. (1998). Experimental Evidence on the Evolution of Meaning of Messages in Sender-Receiver Games. The American Economic Review, 88(5), 1323-1340.

Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13-B25.

Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual Pacts and Lexical Choice in Conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1482-1493.

Brown, R. W. (1958). How shall a thing be called. Psychological Review, 65(1), 14-21.

Bulmer, R. (1967). Why is the Cassowary Not a Bird? A Problem of Zoological Taxonomy Among the Karam of the New Guinea Highlands. Man, 2(1), 5-25.

Cabrera, A., & Billman, D. (1996). Language-Driven Concept Learning: Deciphering Jabberwocky,. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(2), 539-555.

Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P., & Walter, A. A. (1932). An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15(1), 73-86.

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1983). Paradox of the Evolution of Communication and of Social Interactivity. PNAS, 80(7), 2017-2021.

Chater, N., & Vitányi, P. M. B. (2003). Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 19-22.

Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152.

Chiu, C. Y., Krauss, R. M., & Lau, I. Y. M. (1998). Some Cognitive Consequences of Communication. In S. R. Fussell & K. R. J. (Eds.), Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Clark, A. (2006). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(8), 370-374.

Clark, A., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1993). The Cognizer's Innards: A Psychological and Philosophical Perspective on the Development of Thought. Mind & Language, 8(4), 487-519.

Clark, E. V. (1987). The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. Macwhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 1-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

Clark, H. H. (1972). Difficulties people have in answering the question "Where is it?". Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(3), 265-277.

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 62-81.

Clark, H. H., & Lucy, P. (1975). Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(1), 56-72.

Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. Webber & I. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63): Cambridge University Press.

Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 259-294.

Clark, H. H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. (1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 245-258.

Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), 1-39.

Corter, J., & Gluck, M. (1992). Explaining basic categories: Feature predictability and information. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 291-303.

Corter, J., Gluck, M., & Bower, G. (1988). Basic levels in hierarchically structured categories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. (1982). Strategic Information Transmission. Econometrica, 50(6), 1431-1451.

Cruse, D. (1977). The pragmatics of lexical specificity. Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 153-164.

Daniel, T. C. (1972). Nature of the effect of verbal labels on recognition memory for form. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96(1), 152-157.

Davidson, D. (1975). Thought and Talk. In H. Geirsson & M. Losonsky (Eds.), Readings in Language and Mind: An Interdisciplinary Reader (pp. 155-170). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Deacon, T. W. (2000). Evolutionary perspectives on language and brain plasticity. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33(4), 273-291.

Dehaene, S. (2001). Precis of The Number Sense. Mind & Language, 16(1), 16-36.

Deutsch, M. (1949). A Theory of Co-operation and Competition. Human Relations, 2(2), 129-152.

Deutsch, W., & Pechmann, T. (1982). Social interaction and the development of definite descriptions. Cognition, 11(2), 159-184.

Diamond, J. (1966). Zoological Classification System of a Primitive People. Science, 151(3714), 1102-1104.

Feldman, J. (2000). Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407(6804), 630-633.

Feldman, J. (2003a). A catalog of Boolean concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47(1), 75-89.

Feldman, J. (2003b). The simplicity principle in human concept learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(6), 227-232.

Feldman, J. (2006). An algebra of human concept learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50(4), 339-368.

Francik, E. P., & Clark, H. H. (1985). How to make requests that overcome obstacles to compliance. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 560-568.

Freyd, J. (1983). Shareability: The social psychology of epistemology. Cognitive Science, 7(3), 191-210.

Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., & Dumais, S. T. (1987). The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the ACM, 30(11), 964-971.

Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(3), 203-219.

Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 455-479.

Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27(2), 181-218.

Garrod, S., & Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53(3), 181-215.

Gauthier, I., Williams, P., Tarr, M. J., & Tanaka, J. W. (1998). Training 'greeble' experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38(15-16), 2401-2428.

Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2004). Language and the origin of numerical concepts. Science, 306(5695), 441-443.

Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23(3), 183-209.

Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650-669.

Gluck, M. A., & Corter, J. E. (1985). Information, uncertainty, and the utility of categories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ.

Gluck, M. A., Shohamy, D., & Myers, C. (2002). How do People Solve the ``Weather Prediction'' Task?: Individual Variability in Strategies for Probabilistic Category Learning. Learning & Memory, 9(6), 408-418.

Goodenough, W. H. (1965). Yankee Kinship Terminology: A Problem in Componential Analysis. American Anthropologist, 67(5, Part 2: Formal Semantic Analysis), 259-287.

Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306(5695), 496-499.

Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Why do we SLIP to the basic level? Computational constraints and their implementation. Psychological Review, 108(4), 735-758.

Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 205(1161), 581-598.

Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377-388.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

Hamza, W., Bakis, R., Eide, E. M., Picheny, M. A., & Pitrelli, J. F. (2004). The IBM Expressive Speech Synthesis System. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.

Hauser, M. D. (1997). Artifactual kinds and functional design features: what a primate understands without language. Cognition, 64(3), 285-308.

Hauser, M. D. (2000). What do animals think about numbers. American Scientist, 88(2).

Hauser, M. D. (2005). Our chimpanzee mind. Nature, 437(7055), 60-63.

Hauser, M. D., Carey, S., & Hauser, L. B. (2000). Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 267(1445), 829-833.

Hauser, M. D., Macneilage, P., & Ware, M. (1996). Numerical representations in primates. PNAS, 93(4), 1514-1517.

Higgins, E. T. (1981). The "communication game": Implications for social cognition and persuasion. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 1 (pp. 343-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hoffmann, J., & Ziessler, C. (1983). Objektidentifikation in kunstlichen Begriffshierarchien [Object identification in artificial concept hierarchies]. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 191(2), 135-167.

Hood, B. M., Hauser, M. D., Anderson, L., & Santos, L. (1999). Gravity biases in a non-human primate? Developmental Science, 2(1), 35-41.

Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59(1), 91-117.

Hulstijn, J., & Maudet, N. (2006). Uptake and joint action. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2-3), 175-191.

Hunn, E. S. (1977). Tzeltal folk zoology: the classification of discontinuities in nature: Academic Press.

Hutchins, E., & Hazlehurst, B. (1992). Learning in the Cultural Process. In C. G. Langton, C. Taylor, D. J. Farmer & S. Rasmussen (Eds.), Artificial Life II (pp. 689-706). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.

Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(1), 26-37.

Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes: Houghton Mifflin.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4):285-358.

Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16(2), 243-275.

Jones, G. (1983). Identifying basic categories. Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 423-428.

Kaplan, F., & Hafner, V. V. (2006). The challenges of joint attention. Interaction Studies, 7(2), 135-169.

Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. (2007). Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 55(5), 439-459.

Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. (2008). Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups. Computers & Education, 51(1), 54-66.

Katz, P. A. (1963). Effects of labels on children's perception and discrimination learning. Journal of experimental psychology, 66, 423-428.

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension. Psychological Science, 11(1), 32-38.

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Paek, T. S. (1998). Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge: Process Models of Common Ground in Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 1-20.

Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D. J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89(1), 25-41.

Kotovsky, L., & Gentner, D. (1996). Comparison and Categorization in the Development of Relational Similarity. Child Development, 67(6), 2797-2822.

Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1991). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others' knowledge in reference. Social Cognition, 9(1), 2-24.

Krauss, R. M., & Weinheimer, S. (1964). Changes in reference phrases as a function of frequency of usage in social interaction: A preliminary study. Psychonomic Science, 1, 113-114.

Kronmüller, E., & Barr, D. J. (2007). Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from-preemption hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(3), 436-455.

Landau, B., & Shipley, E. (2001). Labelling patterns and object naming. Developmental science, 4(1), 109-118.

Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: a philosophical study: Harvard University Press.

Lewis, D. K. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1), 339-359.

Liberman, A. M., & Whalen, D. H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 187-196.

Lin, E. L., & Murphy, G. L. (1997). Effects of background knowledge on object categorization and part detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1153-1169.

Livingston, K. R., & Andrews, J. K. (1995). On the Interaction of Prior Knowledge and Stimulus Structure in Category Learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 48(1), 208-236.

Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2005). Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 50(4), 315-353.

Love, B. C. (2002). Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 829-835.

Love, B. C. (2003). The multifaceted nature of unsupervised category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 190-197.

Lupyan, G. (2008). From Chair To "Chair:" A Representational Shift Account Of Object Labeling Effects On Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 348-369.

Lupyan, G., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2007). Language Is Not Just for Talking: Redundant Labels Facilitate Learning of Novel Categories. Psychological Science, 18(12), 1077-1083.

Maclin, K. (2002). The effects of exemplar and prototype descriptors on verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(8), 929-936.

Malt, B. C., & Sloman, S. A. (2004). Conversation and convention: Enduring influences on name choice for common objects. Memory and Cognition, 32(8), 1346-1354.

Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., & Gennari, S. (2003a). Speaking vs. thinking about objects and actions. In D. Gentner & G. S. Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (pp. 81-111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., & Gennari, S. (2003b). Universality and language specificity in object naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 20-42.

Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., Gennari, S., Shi, M., & Wang, Y. (1999). Knowing versus Naming: Similarity and the Linguistic Categorization of Artifacts,. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(2), 230-262.

Markman, A. B., & Makin, V. S. (1998). Referential communication and category acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(4), 331-354.

Markman, A. B., & Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 592-613.

Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 121-157.

Matsuka, T., & Corter, J. E. (in press). Observed attention allocation processes in category learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111(4), 960-983.

Medin, D. L., Wattenmaker, W. D., & Hampson, S. E. (1987). Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 242-279.

Melcher, J., & Schooler, J. (1996). The Misremembrance of Wines Past: Verbal and Perceptual Expertise Differentially Mediate Verbal Overshadowing of Taste Memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 231-245.

Meltzoff, & Andrew, N. (2007). Like me: a foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science, 10(1), 126-134.

Mervis, C., & Crisafi, M. (1982). Order of Acquisition of Subordinate-, Basic-, and Superordinate-Level Categories. Child Development, 53(1), 258-266.

Metzing, C., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 201-213.

Minda, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2004). Learning categories by making predictions: An investigation of indirect category learning. Memory & Cognition, 32.

Monos, C. M. (1997). Learning and use of hierarchically structured categories in a social context.

Morris, M. W., & Murphy, G. L. (1990). Converging operations on a basic level in event taxonomies. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 407-418.

Moyer, R. S. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception and Psychophysics, 13(2), 180-184.

Murphy, G. L., & Brownell, H. H. (1985). Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(1), 70-84.

Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92(3), 289-316.

Murphy, G. L., & Smith, E. (1982). Basic-level superiority in picture categorization. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 1-20.

Murphy, G. L., & Wright, J. C. (1984). Changes in conceptual structure with expertise: Differences between real-world experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(1), 144-155.

Nosofsky, R. M., Gluck, M. A., Palmieri, T. J., Mckinley, S. C., & Glauthier, P. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classificatoin learning: a replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins(1961). Memory & cognition, 22(3), 352-369.

Paivio, A. (1978). Mental comparisons involving abstract attributes. Memory & Cognition, 6, 199-208.

Pechmann, T. (1989). Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics, 27, 89-110.

Pfeifer, R., & Bongard, J. C. (2006). How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group. Science, 306(5695), 499-503.

Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1999). Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 136-141.

Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(02), 169-190.

Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2006). Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication. Research on Language & Computation, 4(2), 203-228.

Pietarinen, A. V. (2006). The evolution of semantics and language-games for meaning. Interaction Studies, 7(1), 79-104.

Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships Between Perception and Action (pp. 167-201). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Ratneshwar, S., Barsalou, L. W., Pechmann, C., & Moore, M. (2001). Goal-Derived Categories: The Role of Personal and Situational Goals in Category Representations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 147-157.

Rifkin, A. (1985). Evidence for a basic level in event taxonomies. Memory & Cognition, 13(6), 538-556.

Romney, K., & D'Andrade, R. (1964). Cognitive Aspects of English Kin Terms. American Anthropologist, 66(3, Part 2: Transcultural Studies in Cognition), 146-170.

Romney, K. A., Boyd, J. P., Moore, C. C., Batchelder, W. H., & Brazill, T. J. (1996). Culture as shared cognitive representations. PNAS, 93(10), 4699-4705.

Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382-439.

Ross, B. H. (1997). The Use of Categories Affects Classification. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(2), 240-267.

Ross, B. H. (1999). Postclassification category use: The effects of learning to use categories after learning to classify. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(3), 743-757.

Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479-493.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.

Saxe, R. (2006). Uniquely human social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(2), 235-239.

Schelling, T. C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict: Harvard University Press.

Schooler, J., & Engstler-Schooler, T. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 36-71.

Schvaneveldt, R. W., Durso, F. T., Goldsmith, T. E., Breen, T. J., Cooke, N. M., Tucker, R. G., et al. (1985). Measuring the structure of expertise. International journal of man-machine studies, 23(6), 699-728.

Shepard, R. (1992). The perceptual organization of colors: An adaptation to regularities of the terrestrial world. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 495-532).

Shepard, R., Hovland, C., & Jenkins, H. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 75(13), 1-42.

Simon, H. A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.

Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129-138.

Smith, L., Jones, S., Landau, B., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object Name Learning Provides On-the-Job Training for Attention. Psychological Science, 13(1), 13-19.

Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., & Landau, B. (1996). Naming in young children: a dumb attentional mechanism? Cognition, 60(2), 143-171.

Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp. 315-332). New York: Academic Press.

Stalnaker, R. C. (2002). Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5-6), 701-721.

Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 457-482.

Thompson, R. K. R., Oden, D. L., & Boysen, S. T. (1997). Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23(1), 31-43.

Todd, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Environments That Make Us Smart: Ecological Rationality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 167-171.

Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(05), 727-741.

Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675-691.

Tomasello, M., & Merriman, W. E. (1995). Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part I : Theoretical considerations. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10(1-3), 29-49.

Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial Reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison Jr (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 113(2), 169-197.

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3-15.

Voiklis, J., Kapur, M., Kinzer, C., & Black, J. (2006). An Emergentist Account of Collective Cognition in Collaborative Problem Solving. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986 [1962]). Thought and Language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wagner, W., & Wagner, G. P. (2004). Examining the Modularity Concept in Evolutionary Psychology: The Level of Genes, Mind, and Culture. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 1(3), 135-165.

Waxman, S. R., & Booth, A. E. (2001). Seeing Pink Elephants: Fourteen-Month-Olds Interpretations of Novel Nouns and Adjectives. Cognitive Psychology, 43(3), 217-242.

Waxman, S. R., & Markow, D. B. (1995). Words as Invitations to Form Categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-Month-Old Infants. Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 257-302.

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wiley, J., & Jolly, C. (2003). When two heads are better than one expert. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

Wilkes-Gibbs, D., & Clark, H. (1992). Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 183-194.

Wittgenstein, L. (2001 [1958]). Philosophical Investigations: 50th Anniversary Commemorative Edition (G. E. M. Anscombe & E. Anscombe, Trans.): Blackwell Publishing, Incorporated.

Xu, F. (2002). The role of language in acquiring object kind concepts in infancy. Cognition, 85(3), 223-250.

Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B. (1998). Category Learning by Inference and Classification. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 124-148.

Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B. (2000a). Inference using categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 776-795.

Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B. (2000b). Learning categories composed of varying instances: the effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 64-78.

Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social Facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269-274.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page