Cogprints
Login | Create Account

Information Technology as an Agent of Post-modernism

Nel, Mr DF and Kroeze, Prof JH (2008) Information Technology as an Agent of Post-modernism. [Preprint]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF (Philosophical discussion of the role of ICT in the postmodern era) - Submitted Version
229Kb

Abstract

Society is in a tumultuous state. Today’s Western society is characterized by disillusionment, doubt, irony, fragmentation and plurality. With the failure of Modernism and the rise to prominence of Nihilism, Post-Humanism, Post-Structuralism and Individualism, society has entered a thoroughly Post-Modern era. Over the past couple of decades humanity has increasingly turned to Information Technology as the great enabler. Through the capabilities that Information Technology offers, undreamed heights of scientific and technological progress have been reached in an amazingly short span of time. However, rather than uplifting and emancipating society, the wholesale implementation of Information Technology has brought with it a host of unintended and unforeseen consequences. As with the promises of Modernism, Information Technology has not brought society the Utopia that it imagined. Information Technology rather has acted to create a universe characterized by virtuality, constant change, indeterminacy, and an information orientated perspective on the world. Technological progress has not been accompanied by social progress. Through a comprehensive literature review and an examination of both Post-Modernism and Information Technology, it is proposed that the influences of Information Technology have acted and continued to act to promote Post-Modernism. These influences amongst others include its displacement of space and time, its promotion of the Information Society, its ability to create digital hyperrealities, its destructive influence on tradition and culture, and most of all its catastrophic/ revolutionary impact on the identity. Through these influences this paper seeks to prove that Information Technology acts an agent of Post-Modernism.

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:Information and communication technology Post-modernism
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Science
ID Code:6207
Deposited By:Kroeze, Prof dr JH
Deposited On:19 Sep 2008 14:58
Last Modified:19 Sep 2008 14:58

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Alvarez, I. & Kilbourn, B. 2002. Mapping the Information Society Literature: Topics, Perspectives, and Root Metaphors. First Monday, vol. 7, no. 1. [Online]. Available: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_1/alvarez/index.html

[Cited 18 July 2006].

Avegerou, C. 1998. How can IT enable economic growth in developing countries? Information Technology for Development, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15-28.

Ayers, S. 1999. The Cultural Impact of Computer Technology. [Online].

Available: http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1999/7/99.07.07.x.html

[Cited 3 April 2006].

Berthon, P. & Katsikeas, C. 1998. Essai: Weaving Postmodernism. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, vol. 8, no. 2,

pp. 149-155. [Online]. Available: http://0-proquest.umi.com.innopac.up.ac.za: 80/pqdweb?did=117541706 [Cited 29 October 2006].

Borgman, A. 2000. Society in the Post-Modern era. The Washington Quaterly,

vol. 23, no.1, p. 189-200. [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/demo/ washington_quarterly/v023/23.1borgmann.html [Cited 7 August 2006].

Capurro, R. 1989. Towards an Information Ecology. Proceedings of NORDINFO International Seminar: Information and Quality, August 23-25. [Online].

Available: http://www.capurro.de/nordinf.htm [Cited 25 September 2006].

Capurro, R. 1996. Information Technology and Technologies of the self.

Journal of Information Ethics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 19-28. [Online].

Available: http://www.capurro.de/self.htm [Cited 25 September 2006].

Capurro, R. 2003. On Hermeneutics, Angeletics, and Information Technology: Questions and Tentative Answers. [Online]. Available: http://www.capurro.de/ tsukuba.html [Cited 25 September 2006].

Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Condella, C. 2001. Overcoming the Destining of Technological Being. Fall 2001 Symposium: Humanity’s Place in the Cosmos, November 6. [Online].

Available: www.fordham.edu/philosophy/fps/symposia/2001fall/condella.htm

[Cited 1 August 2006].

Conlon, T. 2000. Visions of change: Information Technology, education and postmodernism. British Journal of educational technology, vol. 31, no. 2

pp. 109-116. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.blackwell-synergy.com .innopac.up.ac.za/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8535.00141 [Cited 30 October 2006].

Cooper, W. n.d. Information Technology and Internet culture. [Online].

Available: http://www.brandeis.edu/pubs/jove/HTML/V6/iculture.html

[Cited 1 August 2006].

Coyne, R. 1998. Cyberspace and Heidegger's pragmatics. Information Technology and People, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 338-350. [Online].

Available: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mcb/161/1998/00000011 /00000004/art00005 [Cited 1 August 2006].

De Beer, F. 1996. Representation, information, technology. Communicatio, South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, vol. 22, no. 1. [Online]. Available: http://www.unisa.ac.za/dept/press/comca/221/ debeer.html/

[Cited 16 September 2006].

Dery, M. 1996. Escape Velocity: Cyberculture at the End of the Century. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Drees, W. 2002. Human Meaning in a Technological Culture: Religion in an age of Technology. Zygon, vol. 37, no. 3. pp. 597-604. [Online].

Available: http://0-www.blackwell-synergy.com.innopac.up.ac.za/ doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9744.00439 [Cited 15 September 2006].

Dupuis, M. 1989. East and West in the face of technological change. Zygon,

vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 437-445. [Online]. Available: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1989.tb00988

[Cited 18 October 2006].

Eischen, K. 2000. Information Technology: History, Practice and implications for Development. CGIRS – Working Paper Series, vol. 4. [Online].

Available:http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010& context=cgirs [Cited 26 October 2006].

Feenberg, A. 1996. Heidegger, Habermas, and the Essence of Technology.

[Online]. Available: http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/feenberg/kyoto.html

[Cited 2 February 2006].

Feigenbaum, H. 2001. The Effects of New Technologies on Cultural Protectionism. Occasional Paper Series. [Online]. Available: http://gstudynet.com/gwcsg/ publications/OPS/papers/feigenbaum.pdf [Cited 12 July 2006].

Floridi, L. 2002. What is the philosophy of information? Metaphilosophy, vol. 33, no. 1 & 2, pp. 123-145. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.blackwell-synergy.com.innopac.up.ac.za/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9973.00221

[Cited 22 October 2006].

Heidegger, M. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays. New York, New York: Harper Torchbooks.

Introna, L. 1995. IT and Socio-Economic Development? South African Computer Journal, no. 15, pp. 1-3.

Kellner, D. 2002. Theorizing Globalization. Sociological Theory, vol. 20, no. 3.

pp. 285-305. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.blackwell-synergy.com. innopac.up.ac.za/doi/abs/10.1111/0735-2751.00165 [Cited 29 October 2006].

Lombardo, T. & College, R. 1997. The Impact of Information Technology: Learning, Living, and Loving in the Future. The Labyrinth, vol. 5, iss. 2. [Online]. Available: http://www.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/labyforum/ Spr97/spr97L8.html

[Cited 8 August 2006].

Lyon, D. 1988. The Information Society: Issues and Illusions. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Marx, G. 2004. Internet anonymity as a reflection of broader issues involving technology and society. Asia-Pacific Review, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 142-166. [Online]. Available: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/ capr/2004/00000011/00000001/art00006 [Cited 23 January 2006].

Masutti, O. 2001. Impact of IT on society in the new century. [Online].

Available: http://www.zurich.ibm.com/pdf/Masutti.pdf

[Cited 25 September 2006].

Nunes, M. 1995. Baudrillard in Cyberspace: Internet, Virtuality, and Postmodernity. Style, vol. 29, pp. 314-327. [Online].

Available:http://project.cyberpunk.ru/idb/cyberspace_internet_virtuality_postmodernity.html [Cited 12 October 2006].

Phahlamohlaka, L. & Kroeze, J. 2005. Sacred space in cyberspace: an African perspective. Journal for Semitics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 413-440.

Pullinger, D. 1999. The impact of Information Technology on personal identity.

The Bible in Transmission, Summer 2003. [Online].

Available:http://www.biblesociety.org.uk/exploratory/articles/pullinger03.pdf

[Cited 30 September 2006].

Rifkin, J. 2000. The Age of Access. How the Shift from Ownership to Access is Transforming Modern Life. London: Penguin.

Robins, K. & Webster, F. 1999. Times of the Technoculture. New York, New York: Routledge.

Rosenberg, R. 2004. The Social Impact of Computers, 3rd ed. London: Elsevier Academic Press.

Slouka, M. 1995. War of the worlds: Cyberspace and the high-tech assault on reality. New York, New York: HarperCollins.

Stahl, B. 2002. Life-World and Information Technology – a Habermasian Approach. Proceedings of the international workshop on Phenomenology, Information Technology and Management, London School of Economics, London, 10 - 11 May. [Online]. Available: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~bstahl/ publications/2002_life_world_and_IT.pdf [Cited 8 August 2006].

Suler, J. 2002. Identity management in cyberspace. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, vol. 4, pp. 455-460. [Online].

Available: http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/identitymanage.html

[Cited 1 October 2006].

Tarnas, R. 1991. The Passion of the Western Mind: Understanding the ideas that have shaped our world view. London: Random House.

Xuanmeng, Y. n.d. Heidegger on Technology: Alienation and Destiny. [Online]

Available: http://www.crvp.org/book/Series03/III-11/chapter_ii.htm

[Cited 5 September 2006].

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.