Cogprints

St. Paul's Error: The Semantic Changes of BODY and SOUL in the Western World

Evola, Vito (2006) St. Paul's Error: The Semantic Changes of BODY and SOUL in the Western World. [Conference Paper]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF (Paper) - Submitted Version
227Kb

Abstract

Historically Christianity owes much to Judaism. St. Paul’s Christianity, however, changed the way of thinking of many of the first Jews because of a new way of reasoning about selfhood, the human body, and human cognition. Without wanting to treat certain theological concepts, I want to underline how modern science’s view of the person is closer to traditional Judaism than it is to Christianity, and how Paul’s “error” was diffused throughout the Western world, by analyzing the semantics of linguistic references to the body, the soul, and emotions. What was St. Paul’s error? The question means to be both allusive and provocative. He was born by the name Saul in the city of Tarsus, in modern Turkey, during the height of its splendour as a Roman-Greek city. Paul grew up as a “free man”, that is, as a Roman citizen in a cosmopolitan environment. He is considered to be the most influential and productive of the testimonies of the Christian thought throughout Asia Minor and Western Europe. His epistles circulated throughout his time and continue to influence millions of followers, who often interpret his thoughts in contrasting manner, but nonetheless attest to his authority. An erudite Greek-Roman, persecutor of the first Christians, Paul battled to spread the story of Jesus of Nazareth. His ideology, indeed, is a blend of Greek-Roman thought and of what he learned from the first Christians. The Hellenic characteristics of his faith created a divergence from traditional Judaic thought within what was to become the Christian creed though his influence. As a matter of fact, Christianity came to have a more coherent structure because of Paul, and Christian belief in a way is more Paul’s thought than it is Jesus’. Jewish teaching circa selfhood was quite holistic. The Hebrew word nephesh is often translated as “soul” but also means “body”, whereas Paul clearly distinguishes the two, talking about a co-existence, “concupiscence” and the necessity of dominating the body to exalt the spirit. I will examine the semantic changes in words dealing with body and soul, and how Paul’s authority eventually influenced the Western world’s way of reasoning about such concepts.

Item Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:philology, cognitive linguistics, body, soul, Hebrew, Greek, English, religion, St. Paul, religion, Christianity, Judaism, frames, translation, exegesis
Subjects:Linguistics > Comparative Linguistics
Philosophy > Metaphysics
Psychology > Psycholinguistics
Psychology > Evolutionary Psychology
Linguistics > Pragmatics
Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy > Ethics
Linguistics > Semantics
Linguistics > Syntax
Philosophy > Philosophy of Science
Psychology > Social Psychology
Philosophy > Philosophy of Language
Linguistics > Historical Linguistics
ID Code:6118
Deposited By:Evola, Vito
Deposited On:15 Jul 2008 10:55
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Croft, W. (1993). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4:335-370.

Evola, Vito (2005) Cognitive Semiotics and On-Line Reading of Religious Texts. Journal of Consciousness, Literature and the Arts Vol. 6(N. 2).

Koch, P. (2004). Metonymy between pragmatics, reference, and diachrony, metaphorik.de 07/2004.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R. (1991). Concept, Image, Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar (second edition: 2002). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Taylor, J. R. (1995). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page