The Sacred Engagement: Outline of a hypothesis about the origin of human ‘religious intelligence’.

Malafouris, Dr Lambros (2007) The Sacred Engagement: Outline of a hypothesis about the origin of human ‘religious intelligence’. [Book Chapter]

Full text available as:



The question that motivates the central hypothesis advanced in this paper regarding the emergence of early religious thinking is the following: ‘why does religion need material culture?’ What basic functional or symbolic need renders material culture an indispensable and universal component of religion and ritual activity? A common temptation, obvious in a number of recent archaeological and anthropological studies, is to seek an answer in the field of memory (Boyer 1993; 1996; 1998; 2001; McCauley and Lawson 2002; Whitehouse 2000; 2004; Mithen 1998a). This paper argues that material culture does much more than simply offer a symbolic channel for the externalization, communication, and thus successful cultural transmission, of religious ideas. Although the mnemonic significance of the ritual object is not denied, it is proposed that the argument from memory, as traditionally premised, fails to provide a cognitively adequate account of the complex affective ties and multimodal interactions that characterise the distinctive phenomenology of religious experience. Moreover, and from a long-term evolutionary perspective, it is argued that the commonly implied ontological priority of the religious idea, over its material expression, leaves us with no explanation about why,and how, religious concepts emerge in the context of human cognitive evolution. Drawing on the theoretical lines of the Material Engagement approach (Malafouris 2004; Renfrew 2004) I want to advance a different hypothesis that places material culture at the heart of the human capacity for religious thinking (cf. Day 2004).

Item Type:Book Chapter
Keywords:evolution of religious thinking, cognitive archaeology, material culture, extended and distributed mind, animism, metaphor, theory of mind
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Psychology > Evolutionary Psychology
Biology > Evolution
ID Code:6045
Deposited By:Malafouris, Dr Lambros
Deposited On:21 Apr 2009 03:36
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Arzy, S., Moshe I., Landis T. and Blanke, O. 2005. Speaking with one’s self. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12, 11, 4–29.

Barrett, J. L. and Keil, F. C. 1996. Conceptualizing a non-natural entity: anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology 31, 219–247.

Boyer, P. 1993. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas, a Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Boyer, P. 1996. What makes anthropomorphism natural: intuitive ontology and cultural representation. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 2, 83–97.

Boyer, P. 1998. Cognitive Tracks of Cultural Inheritance: How Evolved Intuitive Ontology Governs Cultural Transmission. American Anthropologist 100(4), 876–889.

Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained: Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York, Basic Books.

Blanke, O. and Arzy, S. 2005. The out-of-body experience: disturbed self-processing at the temporo-parietal junction. Neuroscientist 11, 16–24.

Blanke O., Landis T., Spinelli L. and Seeck M. 2004. Out-ofbody experience and autoscopy of neurological origin. Brain 127, 243–58.

Clottes, J. and Lewis-Williams J.D. 1998. The Shamans of prehistory: trance and magic in the painted caves. Harry Abrams, New York.

Day, M. 2004. Religion, off-line cognition, and the extended mind. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4 (1), 101–121.

Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York, Basic Books.

Frith, U. and Frith, C. D. 2003. Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358, 459–473.

Gallagher, H. L. and Frith C. D. 2002. Functional imaging of theory of mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 77–83.

Gallese V. and Goldman A. 1998. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2, 493–501.

Gallese, V. 2005. Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4, 23–48.

Guthrie, S. E.1993. Faces in the Clouds. A New Theory of Religion. Oxford, University Press.

Hutchins, E. 2005. Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics 37, 1555–1577.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy In the Flesh, The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, Basic Books.

Leslie, A. 1987. Pretense and Representation: The origins of ‘Theory of Mind’. Psychological Review 94, 412–426.

Lewis-Williams, D. 2002. The Mind in the Cave. London, Thames and Hudson.

Lewis-Williams, D. 2003. Overview. In Review Feature, The Mind in the Cave: Consciousness and the Origins of Art. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 13, 2, 263–79. Johnson, S. C. 2003. Detecting agents. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358, 549–559.

Malafouris, L. 2004. The Cognitive Basis of Material Engagement: Where Brain, Body and Culture Conflate. In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden and C. Renfrew (eds). Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World,. Cambridge, The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 53–62.

Malafouris, L., 2007. Before and beyond Representation: Towards an enactive conception of the Palaeolithic image. In C. Renfrew and I. Morley (eds). Material beginnings: a global prehistory of figurative representation. Cambridge, The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

McCauley, R. N. and Lawson, T. E. 2002. Bringing Ritual to Mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Metzinger, T. 2005. ‘The pre-scientific concept of a ‘soul’. A neurophenomenological hypothesis about its origin’. In M. Peschl (ed.). Auf der Suche nach dem Konzept/Substrat der Seele. Ein Versuch aus der Perspektive der Cognitive (Neuro-) Science. Wurzburg, Konigshausen und Neumann.

Mithen, S. J. 1996. The Prehistory of Mind. London, Thames and Hudson.

Mithen, S. J. 1998a. The Supernatural Beings of Prehistory and The External Storage of Religious Ideas. In C. Renfrew and C. Scarre (eds). Cognition and Material Culture: the Archaeology of Symbolic Storage. Cambridge, The McDonald Institute Monographs, 97–106.

Mithen, S. J. 1998b. Introduction. In S. Mithen (ed.). Creativity in Human Evolution and Prehistory. London and New York, Routledge, 1–15.

Ramachandran, V. S., Azoulai S., Stone L., Srivasan, A. V. and Bijoy N. 2005. Grasping with metaphors and thinking with pictures. Presented at the American Psychological Society annual convention in Loss Angeles (May 26–29).

Renfrew, C., 2004. Towards a Theory of Material Engagement, in E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, and C. Renfrew (eds) Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World. Cambridge, The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 23–31.

Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E. and Cohen, J. D. 2004. The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. NeuroImage, 22, 1694–1703.

Rossano, M. J. 2007. Did meditating make us human? Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17, 1, 47–58.

Saxe, R. and Kanwisher, N. 2003. People thinking about thinking people. The role of the temporo-parietal junction in ‘theory of mind’. Neuroimage, 19, 1835–1842.

Saxe, R., Carey, S., and Kanwiser, N. 2004. Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Psychological Reviews, 55, 87–124.

Saxe, R. and Wexler, A. 2005. Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia 43, 1391–1399. Scholl, B. J., and Tremoulet, P. D. 2000. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299–309.

Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Hermann, S., Happe, F., Falkai, P., Maier, W., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., and Zilles, K. 2001. Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage, 14, 181.

Whitehouse, H. 2000. Arguments and Icons: Divergent Modes of Religiosity. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Whitehouse, H. 2004. Modes of Religiosity. Walnut Creek, CA, AltaMira Press.


Repository Staff Only: item control page