Cogprints

Toward an Ecological Theory of Concepts

Gabora, Dr. Liane M. and Rosch, Dr. Eleanor and Aerts, Dr. Diederik (2008) Toward an Ecological Theory of Concepts. [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]HTML
225Kb

Abstract

Psychology has had difficulty accounting for the creative, context-sensitive manner in which concepts are used. We believe this stems from the view of concepts as identifiers rather than bridges between mind and world that participate in the generation of meaning. This paper summarizes the history and current status of concepts research, and provides a non-technical summary of work toward an ecological approach to concepts. We outline the rationale for applying generalizations of formalisms originally developed for use in quantum mechanics to the modeling of concepts, showing how it is because of the role of context that deep structural similarities exist between the two. A concept is defined not just in terms of exemplary states and their features or properties, but also by the relational structures of these properties, and their susceptibility to change under different contexts. The approach implies a view of mind in which the union of perception and environment drives conceptualization, forging a web of conceptual relations or ‘ecology of mind’.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:categorization, concepts, concept combination, conjunction, context, ecological model, entanglement, exemplar, prototype, quantum structure, theory theory
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Biology > Ecology
Computer Science > Statistical Models
Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
ID Code:5957
Deposited By:Gabora, Dr. Liane
Deposited On:10 Mar 2008 14:53
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Aerts, D. (1982). Description of many physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics, Foundations of Physics, 12, 1131-1170.

Aerts, D. (1983). Classical theories and non classical theories as a special case of a more general theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 24, 2441-2453.

Aerts, D. (1993). Quantum structures due to fluctuations of the measurement situations. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 32, 2207-2220.

Aerts, D. (1999). Foundations of quantum physics: a general realistic and operational approach, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38, 289-358.

Aerts, D. (2002). Being and change: foundations of a realistic operational formalism. In D. Aerts, M. Czachor. & T. Durt (Eds.) Probing the structure of quantum mechanics: Nonlinearity, nonlocality, computation and axiomatics. Singapore: World Scientific.

Aerts, D. (2008). Quantum interference and superposition in cognition: Development of a theory for the disjunction of concepts. http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.0975

Aerts, D., Aerts, S., Broekaert, J., & Gabora, L. (2000). The violation of Bell inequalities in the macroworld. Foundations of Physics, 30(9), 1387-1414.

Aerts, D., Aerts, S. & Gabora, L. (in press). A proof of quantum structure in human cognition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

Aerts, D., Broekaert, J. & Gabora, L. (in press). A case for applying an abstracted quantum formalism to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology.

Aerts, D. & Durt, T. (1994a). Quantum, classical and intermediate: a measurement model. In K. V. Laurikainen, C. Montonen and K. Sunnaborg (Eds.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics. Gives Sur Yvettes, France: Editions Frontieres.

Aerts, D. & Durt, T. (1994b). Quantum, classical and intermediate, an illustrative example. Foundations of Physics, 24, 1353-1369.

Aerts, D. & Gabora, L. (2005a). A state-context-property model of concepts and their combinations I: The structure of the sets of contexts and properties. Kybernetes, 34(1&2), 167-191.

Aerts, D. & Gabora, L. (2005b). A state-context-property model of concepts and their combinations II: A Hilbert space representation. Kybernetes, 34(1&2), 192-221.

Ashby, F. G. & Maddox, W. T. (1993). Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 372-400.

Barsalou, L. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In: U. Neisser (ed.) Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barsalou, L. W. (1990). On the Indistinguishability of Exemplar Memory and Abstraction in Category Representation. In Thomas K. Srull and Robert S. Wyer (eds.), Advances in Social Cognition, Vol. III, Content and Process Specificity in the Effects of Prior Experiences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 61-88.

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,  22(4), 577-660.

Bateson, Gregory (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

Beltrametti, E. & Cassinelli, G. (1981). The logic of quantum mechanics. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Bourne, L. E., Dominowski, Jr., R. L. & Loftus, E. F. (1979). Cognitive processes. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Bruner, J., Goodnow, J., & Austin, A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.

Brunswik, E. (1947). Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments (2nd edition 1956). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bruza, P. & Cole, R. 2005. Quantum Logic of Semantic Space: An exploratory investigation of context effects in practical reasoning. In S. Artemov, H. Barringer, A. S. d'Avila Garcez, L. C. Lamb & J. Woods, Eds. We Will Show Them: Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay, College Publications, 1, 339-361.

Busemeyer, J. R., Wang, Z., & Townsend, J. T. (2006). Quantum dynamics of human decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50, 220-242.

Busemeyer, J. R. & Wang, Z. (2007). Quantum Information Processing Explanation for Interactions between Inferences and Decisions. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Quantum Interaction (pp. 91-97). Stanford University, March 26-28.

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. (1994). The elm and the expert: Mentalese and its semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Foulis, D. & Randall, C. (1981). What are quantum logics and what ought they to be? In E. Beltrametti and B. van Fraassen (eds.), Current Issues in Quantum Logic, 35, Plenum, New York.

Foulis, D., Piron, C., & Randall, C. (1981). Realism, operationalism and quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 13(813), 813-841.

Gabora, L. (1998). Autocatalytic closure in a cognitive system: A tentative scenario for the origin of culture. Psycoloquy, 9(67).

Gabora, L. (1999a). Grounded in perception yet transformed into amodal symbols. Commentary on 'Perceptual symbol systems' by L. W. Barsalou. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660.

Gabora, L. (1999b). Weaving, bending, patching, mending the fabric of reality: A cognitive science perspective on worldview inconsistency. Foundations of Science, 3(2), 395-428.

Gabora, L. (2000). Conceptual closure: Weaving memories into an interconnected worldview. In (G. Van de Vijver & J. Chandler , Eds.) Closure: Emergent Organizations and their Dynamics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 901, 42-53.

Gabora, L. (2004). Ideas are not replicators but minds are. Biology & Philosophy, 19(1), 127-143.

Gabora, L. (2008). The cultural evolution of socially situated cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1-2), 104-113.

Gabora, L. & Aerts, D. (2002a). Contextualizing concepts. Proceedings of the 15th International FLAIRS Conference (Special Track 'Categorization and Concept Representation: Models and Implications'), Pensacola Florida, May 14-17, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 148-152.

Gabora, L. & Aerts, D. (2002b). Contextualizing concepts using a mathematical generalization of the quantum formalism.  Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 14(4), 327-358. http://www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/liane/papers/ccmgqf.pdf

Gärdenfors, P. (2000a). Concept combination: A geometric model. In Blackburn, Braisby, & Shimojima (Eds.) Logic, Language and Computation: Volume 3 (pp. 129-146), CSLI Publications.

Gärdenfors, P. (2000b). Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Gerrig, R. & Murphy, G. (1992). Contextual influences on the comprehension of complex concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 205-230.

Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Gibson, J. J. & Crooks, L. (1938/1982). A theoretic field analysis of automobile driving. In E. Reed & R. Jones (Eds.), Reasons for realism (pp. 120-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Goldmeier, E. (1972). Similarity in visually perceived forms. Psychological Issues (Monograph 29).  New York: International Universities Press.

Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A.N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hampton, J. (1997). Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions, Memory & Cognition, 15, 55-71.

Hampton, J. A. (1988). Disjunction of natural concepts. Memory & Cognition, 16, 579-591.

Hayes, B. K., Foster, K., & Gadd, N. (2003). Prior knowledge and subtyping effects in children’s category learning. Cognition 88(2), 171-199.

Heft, H. (2003). Affordances, dynamic experience, and the challenge of reification. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 149-180.

Heit, E. & Barsalou, L. (1996). The instantiation principle in natural language categories, Memory, 4, 413-451.

Jarvilehto, T. (1998a). The theory of the organism-environment system: I. Description of the theory. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 33, 321-334.

Jarvilehto, T. (1998b). The theory of the organism-environment system: II. Significance of nervous activity in the organism-environment system. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 33, 335-342.

Jauch, J. (1968). Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Kadar, E. & Shaw, R. E. (2000). Toward an ecological field theory of perceptual control of locomotion.  Ecological Psychology, 12, 141 - 180.

Kalish, M. & Kruschke, J. (1997). Decision boundaries in one dimensional categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 1362-1377.

Keil, F.C. (1979). Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Komatsu, L. (1992). Recent views of conceptual structure, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 500-526.

Mackey, G. (1963). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Reading, MA: John Benjamin.

Maddox, W. T. and Ashby F. G. (1993). Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 49-70.

Markman, E. (1989). Categorization and naming in children. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481.

Medin, D., Altom, M., & Murphy, T. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 333-352.

Medin D. L. and Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou, & A. Artony (Eds.) Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Medin, D. & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). A context theory of classification learning, Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.

Medin, D. & Shoben, E. (1988). Context and structure in conceptual combinations, Cognitive Psychology, 20, 158-190.

Medin, D. L., & Wattenmaker, W. D. (1987). Category cohesiveness, theories and cognitive archeology. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 25-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mervis, C. & Crisafi, M. (1982). Order of acquisition of subordinate, basic, and superordinate level categories. Child Development, 53, 258–266.

Mervis, C. & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89-113.

Murphy, G. & Medin, D. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence, Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.

Neisser, U. (1989). Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nelson, D. L., Goodmon, L. B. & Akirmak, U. (2007). Implicitly activated memories are associated to general context cues. Memory and Cognition, 35(8), 1878–1891.

Nelson, D. L., Goodmon, L. B. & Ceo, D. (2007). How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context? Memory and Cognition, 35(5), 1014-1023.

Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L. & Pointer, L. (2003). Spreading activation or spooky action at a distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29, 42−51.

Nelson, D. L. & McEvoy, C. L. (2007). Activation at a distance is not spooky anymore: The conjunction of entangled associative structures and context. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Quantum Interaction (pp. 98-105). Stanford University, March 26-28.

Nosofsky, R. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 700-708.

Nosofsky, R. (1992). Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.) From learning theory to connectionist theory: Essays in honor of William K. Estes. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Nosofsky, R. M., Kruschke, J. K., & McKinley, S. C. (1992). Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 211-33.

Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.

Osherson, D. & Smith, E. (1981). On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition, 9, 35-58.

Piron, C. (1976). Foundations of Quantum Physics. Reading, MA: W.A. Benjamin.

Piron, C. (1989). Recent developments in quantum mechanics, Helvetica Physica Acta, 62, 439-68.

Piron, C. (1990). Mécanique Quantique: Bases et Applications. Lausanne, Switzerland: Press Polytechnique de Lausanne.

Pitowsky, I. (1989). Quantum probability—Quantum logic: Lecture notes in physics 321, Berlin: Springer.

Riegler, A. Peschl, M. & von Stein, A. (1999). Understanding representation in the cognitive sciences. Dordrecht Holland: Kluwer Academic.

Rips, L. J. (1995). The current status of research on concept combination, Mind and Language, 10, 72-104.

Rosch, E. (1973). Natural Categories, Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350.

Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points, Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532-547.

Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization, in Cognition and Categorization, eds. Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Rosch, E. (1983). Prototype classification and logical classification: The two systems. In E. K. Scholnick, Ed, New Trends in Conceptual Representation: Challenges to Piaget’s Theory? (pp. 27-48). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Rosch, E. (1999). Reclaiming concepts, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 61-78.

Rosch, E. (in press). Prototypes. In: P. C. Hogan (Ed.). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B., Eds. (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories, Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.

Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories, Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.

Rosen, R. (1991). Life Itself: A Comprehensive inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press.

Rumelhart, D. E. & Norman, D. A. (1988). Representation in memory. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Hernsein, G. Lindzey & R. D. Luce (Eds.) Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology, New York: Wiley.

Searle, J. (1993). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Skarda, C. (1999). The perceptual form of life. (1999). In. W. J. Freeman & R. Nunez (Eds.).  Reclaiming Cognition: The primacy of action, intention and emotion (pp. 79-94). Thorverton,UK: Imprint Academic.

Smith, E. & Medin, D. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic decisions.  Psychological Review, 81, 214-241.

Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 339–363.

Trevarthen, C. (1993). The self born in intersubjectivity: the psychology of an infant communicating.  In U. Neisser (Ed.). The perceived self: ecological and interpersonal sources of self-knowledge (pp. 121-173). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

Turvey, M. T., & Shaw, R. E. (1995). Toward an ecological physics and a physical psychology.  In R. Solso and D. Massaro (Eds.), The science of the mind: 2001 and beyond. (pp. 144-169). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.

Widdows, D. S. (2003). Orthogonal negation in vector spaces for modeling word meanings and document retrieval. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (p. 136-143), Sapporo Japan, July 7−12.

Widdows, D. & Peters, S. (2003). Word vectors and quantum logic: experiments with negation and disjunction. In Eighth Meeting of the Association for the Mathematics of Language (p. 141-154), Bloomington IN: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Wisniewski, E. J. (1996). Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(3), 434-453.

Wisniewski, E. J. (1997a). Conceptual combination: Possibilities and esthetics. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.) Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Wisniewski, E. J. (1997b). When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(2), 167-183.

Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page