On the Role of AI in the Ongoing Paradigm Shift within the Cognitive Sciences

Anderson, M.L. (2003), “Embodied Cognition: A field guide”, Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), pp. 91-130

Beer, R.D. (1995), “A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction”, Artificial Intelligence, 72(1-2), pp. 173-215

Beer, R.D. (2000), “Dynamical approaches to cognitive science”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(3), pp. 91-99

Boden, M.A. (2006), Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science, 2 vols., Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

Brooks, R.A. (1991), “Intelligence without representation”, Artificial Intelligence, 47(1-3), pp. 139-160

Brooks, R.A. (1997), “From earwigs to humans”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 20(2-4), pp. 291-304

Clark, A. (1997), Being There, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Di Paolo, E.A. (2003), “Organismically-inspired robotics: homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop”, in: K. Murase & T. Asakura (eds.), Dynamical Systems Approach to Embodiment and Sociality, Adelaide, Australia: Advanced Knowledge International, pp. 19-42

Di Paolo, E.A., Noble, J. & Bullock, S. (2000), “Simulation Models as Opaque Thought Experiments”, in: M.A. Bedau et al. (eds.), Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 497-506

Di Paolo, E.A., Rohde, M. & De Jaegher, H. (2007), “Horizons for the Enactive Mind: Values, Social Interaction, and Play”, Cognitive Science Research Paper, 587, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

Dreyfus, H.L. (1991), Being-in-the-World, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Dreyfus, H.L. (2007), “Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian”, Philosophical Psychology, 20(2), pp. 247-268

Dreyfus, H.L. & Dreyfus, S.E. (1988), “Making a mind versus modelling the brain: artificial intelligence back at a branch-point”, Daedalus¸ 117(1), p. 15-44

Fodor, J.A. (1975), The Language of Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni. Press

Froese, T., Virgo, N. & Izquierdo, E. (2007), “Autonomy: a review and a reappraisal”, in: F. Almeida e Costa et al. (eds.), Proc. of the 9th Euro. Conf. on Artificial Life, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, in press

Gallagher, S. (2005), How the Body Shapes the Mind, New York, NY: Oxford University Press

Hanna, R. & Thompson, E. (2003), “The Mind-Body-Body Problem”, Theoria et Historia Scientarum, 7(1), pp. 24-44

Harnard, S. (1990), “The symbol grounding problem”, Physica D, 42, pp. 335-346

Harvey, I. (2004), “Homeostasis and Rein Control: From Daisyworld to Active Perception”, in: J. Pollack et al. (eds.), Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 309-314

Harvey, I., Di Paolo, E.A., Wood, R., Quinn, M. & Tuci, E. A. (2005), ‘Evolutionary Robotics: A new scientific tool for studying cognition’, Artificial Life, 11(1-2), pp. 79-98

Iizuka, H. & Di Paolo, E.A. (forthcoming), “Toward Spinozist robotics: Exploring the minimal dynamics of behavioral preference”, Adaptive Behavior

Ikegami, T. & Suzuki, K. (forthcoming), “From Homeostatic to Homeodynamic Self”, BioSystems

Jonas, H. (1966), The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology, Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 2001

Levine, J. (1983), “Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, pp. 354-361

Maturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J. (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers

McCarthy, J. & Hayes, P.J. (1969), “Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence”, in: B. Meltzer & D. Michie (eds.), Machine Intelligence 4, Edinburgh, UK: Edinburg University Press, pp. 463-502

McClelland, J.L., Rumelhart, D.E. & the PDP Research Group (1986), Parallel Distributed Processing. Vol. 2: Psychological and Biological Models, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Newell, A. & Simon, H.A. (1976), “Computer Science as Empirical Enquiry: Symbols and Search”, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 19(3), pp. 113-126

Noë, A. (2004), Action in Perception, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Nolfi, S. & Floreano, D. (2000), Evolutionary Robotics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Pfeifer, R. (1996), “Building ‘Fungus Eaters’: Design Principles of Autonomous Agents”, in: P. Maes et al. (eds.), Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, p. 3-12

Pfeifer, R. & Scheier, C. (1999), Understanding Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Thompson, E. (2005), “Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), pp. 407-427

Thompson, E. (2007), Mind in Life, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Thompson, E. & Varela, F.J. (2001), “Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(10), pp. 418-425

Torrance, S. (2005), “In search of the enactive: Introduction to special issue on enactive experience”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), pp. 357-368

van Gelder, T. (1998), “The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(5), pp. 615-665

Varela, F.J. (1976), “Not One, Not Two”, The Co-Evolution Quarterly, 12, pp. 62-67

Varela, F.J. & Shear, J. (1999), ‘First-person Methodologies: What, Why, How?’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(2-3), pp. 1-14

Varela, F.J, Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Weber, A. & Varela, F.J. (2002), “Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, pp. 97-125

Wheeler, M. (2005), Reconstructing the Cognitive World, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Ziemke, T. (2007), “What’s life got to do with it?”, in: A. Chella & R. Manzotti (eds.), Artificial Consciousness, Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, pp. 48-66