Cogprints

The Last Scientific Revolution

Kirilyuk, Andrei (2007) The Last Scientific Revolution. [Preprint]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
204Kb

Abstract

Critically growing problems of fundamental science organisation and content are analysed with examples from physics and emerging interdisciplinary fields. Their origin is specified and new science structure (organisation and content) is proposed as a unified solution.

Item Type:Preprint
Additional Information:20 pages; 94 refs
Keywords:dynamic complexity; chaos; dynamically multivalued behaviour; probabilistic dynamical fractal; symmetry of complexity; revolution of complexity; sustainable development
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Science
ID Code:5589
Deposited By:Kirilyuk, Andrei
Deposited On:07 Jun 2007
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

[1] J. Maddox, “Restoring good manners in research”, Nature 376 (1995) 113.

J. Maddox, “The prevalent distrust of science”, Nature 378 (1995) 435.

[2] J. Ziman, “Is science losing its objectivity?”, Nature 382 (1996) 751.

[3] J. Horgan, The End of Science. Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age (Addison-Wesley, Helix, 1996).

J. Horgan, “The Final Frontier”, Discover 27, No. 10, October (2006). Accessible at http://www.discover.com/issues/oct-06/cover/.

See also Horganism blog, http://discovermagazine.typepad.com/horganism/ , CSW blog, http://www.stevens.edu/csw/cgi-bin/blogs/csw/ , and John Horgan's page, http://www.johnhorgan.org/.

[4] J. Horgan, “From Complexity to Perplexity”, Scientific American, June (1995) 74.

[5] J. Horgan, The Undiscovered Mind: How the Human Brain Defies Replication, Medication, and Explanation (Touchstone/Simon & Schuster, New York, 1999).

[6] J. Horgan, “In Defense of Common Sense”, New York Times, August 12 (2005), accessible at http://www.johnhorgan.org/work5.htm. See also Edge, No. 165, August (2005), http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge165.html.

[7] A. Sangalli, “They burn heretics, don't they?”, New Scientist, 6 April (1996) 47.

[8] Y. Farge, “Pour davantage d'éthique dans le monde de la recherche”, Science Tribune, Octobre 1996, http://www.tribunes.com/tribune/art96/farg.htm.

[9] A.A. Berezin, “Hampering the progress of science by peer review and by the “selective” funding system”, Science Tribune, December 1996, http://www.tribunes.com/tribune/art96/bere.htm.

[10] D. Braben, “The repressive regime of peer-review bureaucracy?”, Physics World, November (1996) 13.

[11] C. Wennerås and A. Wold, “Nepotism and sexism in peer-review”, Nature 387 (1997) 341.

[12] K. Svozil, “Censorship and the peer review system”, arXiv:physics/0208046.

[13] D. Adam and J. Knight, “Publish, and be damned ...”, Nature 419 (2002) 772.

[14] P.A. Lawrence, “Rank injustice”, Nature 415 (2002) 835.

P.A. Lawrence, “The politics of publication”, Nature 422 (2003) 259.

“Challenging the tyranny of impact factors”, Nature 423 (2003) 479.

P.A. Lawrence and M. Locke, “A man for our season”, Nature 386 (1997) 757.

[15] M. Gad-el-Hak, “Publish or Perish – An Ailing Enterprise?”, Physics Today 57, March (2004) 61. Accessible at http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-3/p61.html.

[16] M.V. Simkin and V.P. Roychowdhury, “Copied citations create renowned papers?”, arXiv:cond-mat/0305150. See also arXiv:cond-mat/0401529.

[17] J.C. Bermejo-Barrera, “The Weakness of the Scientific Assessments: A Praise of Silence”, arXiv:physics/0602167.

[18] J.D. Patterson, “An Open Letter to the Next Generation”, Physics Today 57, March (2004) 56. Accessible at http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p56.html.

[19] The Flight from Science and Reason, eds. P.R. Gross, N. Levitt, and M.W. Lewis (New York Academy of Sciences, 1996). Also: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 775.

[20] J. Bricmont, “Le relativisme alimente le courant irrationnel”, La Recherche, No. 298, mai (1997) 82.

[21] A. Sokal and J. Bricmont, Impostures intellectuelles (Odile Jacob, Paris, 1997).

[22] D.S. Greenberg, Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion (University of Chicago Press, 2001).

[23] M. Lopez-Corredoira, “What is research?”, arXiv:physics/0201012. Ciencia Digital 8 (2000).

[24] M. Lopez-Corredoira, “What do astrophysics and the world's oldest profession have in common?”, arXiv:astro-ph/0310368.

[25] C. Chiesa and L. Pacifico, “Patronage lies at the heart of Italy's academic problems”, Nature 414 (2001) 581.

[26] G. Blumfiel, “Bell Labs launches inquiry into allegations of data duplication”, Nature 417 (2002) 367.

G. Brumfiel, “Misconduct in physics: Time to wise up?”, Nature 418 (2002) 120.

“Reputations at risk”, Editorial, Physics World, August (2002).

E. Check, “Sitting in judgement”, Nature 419 (2002) 332.

[27] L. Stenflo, “Intelligent plagiarists are the most dangerous”, Nature 427 (2004) 777.

[28] C. Whitbeck, “Trust and the Future of Research”, Physics Today 57, November (2004) 48. Accessible at http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-11/p48.html.

[29] J. Giles, “Taking on the cheats”, Nature 435 (2005) 258. See also Nature 436 (2005) 24, accessible at http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v436/n7047/pdf/436024b.pdf.

[30] B.C. Martinson, M.S. Anderson and R. de Vries, “Scientists behaving badly”, Nature 435 (2005) 737.

[31] Q. Schiermeier, “Ukraine scientists grow impatient for change”, Nature 440 (2006) 132.

[32] W.F. Palosz, “Eastern European science needs sweeping changes”, Nature 440 (2006) 992. Accessible at http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7087/full/440992c.html.

[33] News in brief: “Rejected physicists instigate anti-arXiv site”, Nature 432 (2004) 428. See also http://archivefreedom.org.

B. Josephson, “Vital resource should be open to all physicists”, Nature 433 (2005) 800. Accessible at http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v433/n7028/full/433800a.html. See also http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/archivefreedom/main.html.

[34] Major web sites on science freedom: http://archivefreedom.org/, http://www.cosmologystatement.org, http://amasci.com/weird/wclose.html, http://www.suppressedscience.net/, http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/.

[35] A.P. Kirilyuk, Universal Concept of Complexity by the Dynamic Redundance Paradigm: Causal Randomness, Complete Wave Mechanics, and the Ultimate Unification of Knowledge (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1997), 550 p., in English. For a non-technical review see also arXiv:physics/9806002.

[36] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Dynamically Multivalued, Not Unitary or Stochastic, Operation of Real Quantum, Classical and Hybrid Micro-Machines”, arXiv:physics/0211071. See especially section 9 for a detailed discussion of modern science structure and development.

[37] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Towards Sustainable Future by Transition to the Next Level Civilisation”, in The Future

of Life and the Future of Our Civilisation, ed. by V. Burdyuzha (Springer, Dordrecht, 2006), p. 411; arXiv:physics/0509234. See also http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ccsd-00004214.

[38] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Creativity and the New Structure of Science”, arXiv:physics/0403084.

[39] M. Rees, Our Final Hour: A scientist’s warning: How terror, error, and environmental disaster threaten humankind’s future in this century (Basic Books, New York, 2003).

[40] J. de Rosnay, “Du pasteur au passeur”, Le Monde de l'Education, de la Culture et de la Formation, No. 245, fevrier (1997) 20.

[41] O. Postel-Vinay, “La recherche menacée d'asphyxie”, Le Monde de l'Education, de la Culture et de la Formation, No. 245, fevrier (1997) 47.

O. Postel-Vinay, “La défaite de la science française”, La Recherche, No. 352, avril (2002) 60.

O. Postel-Vinay, “L'avenir de la science française”, La Recherche, No. 353, mai (2002) 66.

O. Postel-Vinay, Blog sur science, http://www.arborescience.com/site/index/index.php?id_blog=4 .

[42] Sciences à l'école: De désamour en désaffection, Le Monde de l'Education, Octobre (2002), 25.

[43] S.S. Masood, “The Decrease in Physics Enrollment”, arXiv:physics/0509206.

[44] S. Nagel, “Physics in Crisis”, Physics Today 55, September (2000) 55. Also: FermiNews 25, No. 14, August 30 (2002), http://www.fnal.gov/pub/ferminews/ferminews02-08-30/p1.html.

P. Rodgers, “Hanging together”, Physics World, October (2002), Editorial.

[45] L. Smolin, The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next (Houghton Mifflin, 2006).

[46] N. Maxwell, Is Science Neurotic? (Imperial College Press, London, 2004). See also http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002386/, http://www.nick-maxwell.demon.co.uk/.

[47] M. Gibbons, “Science's new social contract with society”, Nature 402 Supp (1999) C81.

[48] H. Nowotny, P. Scott, and M. Gibbons, Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Polity Press, 2001).

[49] S. Fuller, The Governance of Science: Ideology and the Future of the Open Society (Open Society Press, Buckingham, 1999).

S. Fuller, Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times (University of Chicago Press, 2000).

[50] H. Bergson, L'évolution créatrice (Félix Alcan, Paris, 1907). English translation: Creative Evolution

(Macmillan, London,1911).

[51] L. de Broglie, “Nécessité de la liberté dans la recherche scientifique”, In Certitudes et Incertitudes de la Science (Albin Michel, Paris, 1966). Original edition: 1962.

L. de Broglie, “Les idées qui me guident dans mes recherches”, In Certitudes et Incertitudes de la Science (Albin Michel, Paris, 1966). Original edition: 1965.

[52] G. Lochak, Louis de Broglie. Un prince de la science (Flammarion, Paris, 1992).

G. Lochak, Défense et illustration de la science. Le savant, la science et l'ombre (Ellipses, Paris, 2002).

[53] T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago University Press, 1970). First edition: 1962.

[54] C.J. Bjerknes, Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist (XTX Inc., Downers Grove, 2002).

J. Hladik, Comment le jeune et ambitieux Einstein s'est approprié la Relativité restreinte de Poincaré (Ellipses Marketing, 2004).

[55] I. Prigogine and I. Stengers, Order Out of Chaos (Heinemann, London, 1984).

[56] J. Brockman, The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution (Touchstone Books, 1996). See also J. Brockman, “The Third Culture”, Edge, http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/index.html.

The New Humanists: Scientists at the Edge, edited by J. Brockman (Barnes & Noble Books, 2003). See also Edge, http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/brockman/brockman_print.html.

[57] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Dynamically Multivalued Self-organisation and Probabilistic Structure Formation Processes”, Solid State Phenomena 97–98 (2004) 21; arXiv:physics/0405063.

[58] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Universal Symmetry of Complexity and Its Manifestations at Different Levels of World Dynamics”, Proceedings of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine 50 (2004) 821; arXiv:physics/0404006.

[59] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Quantum chaos and fundamental multivaluedness of dynamical functions”, Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie 21 (1996) 455; arXiv:quant-ph/9511034 – 38.

[60] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Quantum Field Mechanics: Complex-Dynamical Completion of Fundamental Physics and Its Experimental Implications”, arXiv:physics/0401164. See also arXiv:physics/0410269, arXiv:quant-ph/0012069, arXiv:quant-ph/9902015 – 16.

[61] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Complex-Dynamical Approach to Cosmological Problem Solution”, arXiv:physics/0510240. See also arXiv:physics/0408027.

[62] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Consistent Cosmology, Dynamic Relativity and Causal Quantum Mechanics as Unified

Manifestations of the Symmetry of Complexity”, arXiv:physics/0601140.

[63] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Complex Dynamics of Real Nanosystems: Fundamental Paradigm for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology”, Nanosystems, Nanomaterials, Nanotechnologies 2 (2004) 1085;

arXiv:physics/0412097.

[64] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Complex-Dynamical Extension of the Fractal Paradigm and Its Applications in Life Sciences”, in Fractals in Biology and Medicine. Vol. IV, ed. by G.A. Losa, D. Merlini, T.F. Nonnenmacher, and E.R. Weibel (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2005), p. 233; arXiv:physics/0502133.

See also arXiv:physics/0305119.

[65] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Emerging Consciousness as a Result of Complex-Dynamical Interaction Process”, arXiv:physics/0409140.

[66] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Unreduced Dynamic Complexity: Towards the Unified Science of Intelligent Communication Networks and Software”, arXiv:physics/0603132. See also arXiv:physics/0412058.

[67] J.A. Wheeler, “Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links”, in Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, ed. by W. Zurek (Addison-Wesley, 1990), p. 3. First edition: 1989.

[68] B. Greene, The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory (Vintage Books, 2000). First edition: 1999.

[69] A. Connes, “La réalité mathématique archaïque”, La Recherche, No. 332, Juin (2000) 109.

[70] J.B. Barbour, The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Physics (Oxford University Press, 2001).

[71] R. Aldrovandi and A.L. Barbosa, “Spacetime algebraic skeleton”, arXiv:gr-qc/0207044.

[72] M. Bounias and V. Krasnoholovets, “The Universe from Nothing: A Mathematical Lattice of Empty Sets”, International Journal of Anticipatory Computing Systems 16 (2004) 3; arXiv:physics/0309102.

[73] M. Tegmark, “The Mathematical Universe”, arXiv:0704.0646v1 [gr-qc].

[74] R. Penrose, “What Is Reality?”, New Scientist, 18 November (2006) 32.

[75] R. Penrose, Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness (Oxford University Press, 1994).

[76] M. Kline, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty (Oxford University Press, 1980).

M. Kline, Mathematics and the Search for Knowledge (Oxford University Press, 1985).

[77] E.P. Wigner, “The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics”, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 13 (1960) 1; http://www.dartmouth.edu/~matc/MathDrama/reading/Wigner.html.

[78] An Open Letter to Scientific Community, http://cosmologystatement.org/.

See also: E. Lerner, “Bucking the Big Bang”, New Scientist, No. 2448, May 22 (2004).

Alternative Cosmology Group, http://www.cosmology.info/.

[79] 1st Crisis in Cosmology Conference, CCC-I, ed. by E.J. Lerner and J.B. Almeida (American Institute of Physics, Melville, 2006); http://proceedings.aip.org/dbt/dbt.jsp?KEY=APCPCS&Volume=822&Issue=1.

[80] Quantum Universe: The Revolution in the 21st Century Particle Physics (DOE/NSF, High-Energy Physics Advisory Panel, Quantum Universe Committee, 2004); http://interactions.org/quantumuniverse/.

[81] H. Watzman, “A Theorist of Errors”, Nature 433 (2005) 9.

[82] M.I. Dyakonov, “Is Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation Really Possible?”, arXiv:quant-ph/0610117. See also arXiv:cond-mat/0110326.

[83] R. P. Feynman, “There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom”, Engineering and Science (California Institute

of Technology), February 1960, p. 22. Reproduced at http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html.

[84] K.E. Drexler, Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992).

K.E. Drexler, Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology (Anchor Press/Doubleday, New York, 1986).

[85] Detailed references to nanotechnology resources can be found at the web sites of Foresight Institute, http://www.foresight.org/resources/ , and Zyvex company, http://www.zyvex.com/nano/.

[86] Popular reviews and professional discussions on nanotechnology can be found in a number of articles in Scientific American accessible from the Nanotechnology web page, http://www.sciam.com/nanotech.

See for example: K.E. Drexler, “Machine-Phase Nanotechnology”, Scientific American 285, September (2001),

http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=00066268-1402-1C6F-84A9809EC588EF21.

G. Stix, “Little Big Science”, ibid., http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=00018E72-2E88-1C6F-84A9809EC588EF21.

G.M. Whitesides, “The Once and Future Nanomachine”, ibid., http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=0001D63A-2F47-1C6F-84A9809EC588EF21.

[87] Broad and ambitious research programmes on nanotechnology are generously supported e.g. by the US Government, http://nano.gov, and the European Commission, http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology/.

[88] S. Wolfram, A New Kind of Science (Wolfram Media, Champaign, 2002).

[89] C. R. Shalizi and J. P. Crutchfield, “Pattern Discovery and Computational Mechanics”, arXiv:cs.LG/0001027.

[90] W. Steffen, J. Jäger, D.J. Carson, and C. Bradshaw (eds.) Challenges of a Changing Earth. Proceedings of the Global Change Open Science Conference, Amsterdam, 10–13 July 2001 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2002).

[91] A. Yu. Khrennikov, “Brain as Quantum-like Machine for Transferring Time into Mind”, arXiv:q-bio.NC/0702004. See also arXiv:physics/0702250, physics/0608236, quant-ph/0607196.

[92] A. Khrennikov, “To quantum mechanics through random fluctuations at the Planck time scale”, arXiv:hep-th/0604011. See also arXiv:hep-th/0604163, quant-ph/0601174, cond-mat/0506077.

[93] R. Descartes, Discours de la Méthode. Plus: La Dioptrique, les Météores et la Géometrie (Fayard, Paris, 1987). First edition: 1637.

[94] R. Descartes, Les Principes de la Philosophie. Dans Œuvres philosophiques III (Edition de F. Alquié, Paris, 1998). First edition: 1644.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page