Cogprints

Growth suppression of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 by a non-DT104 strain in vitro

Y B, Ngwai and Y, Adachi and Y, Ogawa (2006) Growth suppression of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 by a non-DT104 strain in vitro. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
161Kb

Abstract

Growth suppression of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 by a non-DT104 strain was investigated in vitro. Chromosomal mutants of eight antibiotic-resistant DT104 strains were generated by sub-culturing on desoxycholate hydrogen sulfide lactose agar containing 25 µg/ml of nalidixic acid. Low counts of each of these mutants (designated as “minority cultures”) were inoculated into 24-h cultures of a non-DT104 S. typhimurium strain (designated as “majority culture”) to test the ability of the majority culture to suppress the multiplication of the minority culture. Multiplication of small numbers of the antibiotic-resistant DT104 strains was significantly (P < 0.05) prevented when the DT104s were added to 24-h brain heart infusion cultures of the non-DT104 strain. This observation has practical implications for the control of the menacing antibiotic-resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104.

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:Salmonella typhimurium DT104; non-DT104; growth suppression
Subjects:JOURNALS > Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences
ID Code:5323
Deposited By:Kakkilaya Bevinje, Dr. Srinivas
Deposited On:22 Dec 2006
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Barrow PA, Tucker JF, Simpson JM. Inhibition of colonization of the chicken alimentary tract with Salmonella typhimurium by Gram-negative facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Epidemiology and Infection 1987;98:311-322.

2. Berchieri A Jr., Barrow PA. Further studies on the inhibition of colonization of the chicken alimentary tract with Salmonella typhimurium by pre-colonization with an avirulent mutant. Epidemiology and Infection 1990;104:427-441.

3. Berchieri A Jr., Barrow PA. In vitro characterization of intra-generic inhibition of growth in Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of General Microbiology 1991;137:2147–2153.

4. Schwartz KJ. Salmonellosis. In Straw DE, D`Allaire S, Mengeling WL, et al, editors. Diseases of Swine. 8th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1999. p. 535-51.

5. WHO. Drug-resistant Salmonella. World Health Organization Fact sheet No. 139, revised April 2005.

6. Low D, Braaten B, van der Woude M. Fimbriae. In Neidhardt FC, Curtiss III R, Ingraham JL, et al, editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology Press; 1996. p. 146-57.

7. Threlfall EJ, Ward LR, Rowe B. Multi-resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 and Salmonella bacteraemia. Lancet 1998;352:287-8.

8. Baggessen DL, Sandvang D, Aarestrup FM. Characterization of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium DT104 Isolated from Denmark and Comparison with Isolates from Europe and United States. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2000;38:1581-1586.

9. Sameshima T, Akiba M, Izumiya H, Terajima J, Tamura K, Watanabe H, Nakazawa M. Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 from Livestock in Japan. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases 2000;53:15-16.

10. Akkina JE, Hougue AT, Angulo RJ, et al. Epidemiologic aspects, control, and importance of multi-drug resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 in the United States. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1999;214:790-798.

11. Szmolleny G., Kostya A, Kovacs S, et al. Epidemiology and characterization of animal Salmonella enterica subspecies Enterica serotype Typhimurium DT104 in Hungary. Acta Veterinary of Hungary 2000;48:407-420.

12. Smith HW, Tucker JF. The effect of antibiotic therapy on the faecal excretion of Salmonella typhimurium by experimentally infected chickens. Journal of Hygiene 1975; 75: 275-292.

13. Smith HW, Tucker JF. The virulence of Salmonella strains for chickens: their excretion by infected chickens. Journal of Hygiene 1980;84:479-488.

14. Nogrady N, Imre A, Rychlik I, et al. Growth and colonization suppression of Salmonella enterica serovar Hadar in vitro and in vivo. FEMS Microbiology Letters 2003;218:127-133.

15. Bäumler AJ, Hargis BM, Tsolis RM. Tracing of origins of Salmonella outbreaks. Science 2000;287:50-52.

16. Davis BD, Dulbeco R, Elsen HN, et al. Microbiology. 2nd ed. London: Harper & Row; 1973.

17. Barrow PA, Lovell MA, Zhang Barber L. Growth Suppression in Early-Stationary-Phase Nutrient Broth Cultures of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli Is Genus Specific and Not Regulated by σs. Journal of Bacteriology 1996;178:3072-3076.

18. Rychlik I, Martin G, Methner U, et al. Identification of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium genes associated with growth suppression in stationary-phase nutrient broth cultures and in the chicken intestine. Archives of Microbiology 2002; 178: 411-420.

19. Zambrano MM, Kolter R. Escherichia coli mutants lacking NADH dehydrogenase I have a competitive disadvantage in stationary phase. Journal of Bacteriology 1993; 175: 5642-5647.

20. Zambrano MM, Siegele DA, Almiron M, et al. Microbial competition: Escherichia coli mutants that take over stationary phase cultures. Science 1993;259:1757-1759.

21. Graham-Smith GS. The behavior of bacteria in fluid cultures as indicated by daily estimates of the numbers of living organisms. Journal of Hygiene 1920;19:133-204.

22. Hershey AD, Bronfenbrenner J. On factors limiting bacterial growth. International Proceedings Society Experimemtal Biology New York 1937;36:556-561.

23. Topley WWC, Wilson GS. Principles of bacteriology and immunity. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold; 1936.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page