Cogprints

Automated Screening for Three Inborn Metabolic Disorders: A Pilot Study

S, Kavitha and S N, Sarbadhikari and N Rao, Ananth (2006) Automated Screening for Three Inborn Metabolic Disorders: A Pilot Study. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
92Kb

Abstract

Background: Inborn metabolic disorders (IMDs) form a large group of rare, but often serious, metabolic disorders. Aims: Our objective was to construct a decision tree, based on classification algorithm for the data on three metabolic disorders, enabling us to take decisions on the screening and clinical diagnosis of a patient. Settings and Design: A non-incremental concept learning classification algorithm was applied to a set of patient data and the procedure followed to obtain a decision on a patient’s disorder. Materials and Methods: Initially a training set containing 13 cases was investigated for three inborn errors of metabolism. Results: A total of thirty test cases were investigated for the three inborn errors of metabolism. The program identified 10 cases with galactosemia, another 10 cases with fructosemia and the remaining 10 with propionic acidemia. The program successfully identified all the 30 cases. Conclusions: This kind of decision support systems can help the healthcare delivery personnel immensely for early screening of IMDs.

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:Decision support techniques, Metabolic diseases, Computer-assisted diagnosis, Expert system
Subjects:JOURNALS > Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences
ID Code:5320
Deposited By:Kakkilaya Bevinje, Dr. Srinivas
Deposited On:22 Dec 2006
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Fernandez J, Saudubray J-M, Van Bergeh G. Eds, Inborn Metabolic Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment. 4th ed, New York, Springer-Verlag, 2006

2. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall / CRC Press, 1984

3. Hofestadt R, Mischke U, Scholz U. Knowledge Acquisition, Management and Representation for the Diagnostic Support in Human Inborn Errors of Metabolism, Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000; 77:857-62

4. Kauert R, Topel T, Scholz U, Hofestadt R. Information System for the Support of Research, Diagnosis and Therapy of Inborn Metabolic Diseases, Medinfo. 2001; 10(Pt 1): 353-6

5. Pince H, Cobbaert C, van de Woestijne M, Lissens W, Willems JL.

Computer Aided Phenotyping of Dyslipoproteinemia, Int J Biomed Comput. 1988 Dec; 23(3-4):251-63

6. Wyett CE. “MetaNet” http://medexpert.imc.akh-wien.ac.at/metanet_info.html (Accessed July 2006).

7. Smith S, The Classification Algorithm http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/staffpages/serengul/The.Classification.algorithm.htm (Accessed July 2006).

8. Troendle JF, Liu A, Wu C, Yu KF. Sequential testing for efficacy in clinical trials with non-transient effects. Stat Med. 2005 Nov 15; 24(21): 3239-50

9. Hermann W, Wagner A, Kuhn HJ, Grahmann F, Villmann T. Classification of fine-motoric disturbances in Wilson's disease using artificial neural networks. Acta Neurol Scand. 2005 Jun;111(6):400-6

10. Baumgartner C, Bohm C, Baumgartner D, Marini G, Weinberger K, Olgemoller B, Liebl B, Roscher AA. Supervised machine learning techniques for the classification of metabolic disorders in newborns. Bioinformatics 2004 Nov 22; 20(17):2985-96. Epub 2004 Jun 4

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page