Multi-Media As a Cognitive Tool

Alkhalifa, Dr Eshaa M. (2002) Multi-Media As a Cognitive Tool. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:



Two of the modalities used to present information to students, namely, animation and verbal representation are in a constant competition in effectiveness, without any persistent winner, except when it comes to conceptual versus procedural knowledge. Here, we present an architecture that combines the two into a multi-media tutoring system. This system is tested and results indicate that combining the two media leads to a cognitive interaction that promotes student learning with no less than 40% from their post classical-classroom session levels. A test for individual differences indicates that this group is almost equally divided between those described as “spatially oriented” and those described as “verbally oriented”. Learning across the two types of learners does not show any significant differences, except with respect to one question. This implies that perhaps, the two media may have ambiguous internal factors that support each other. Additionally, individual learning styles does not seem to be a clear-cut division, and is instead a “preference” of one modality as a primary source of learning, not an only one.

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:Cognitive Tool, Learning styles, multimedia, distance learning
Subjects:Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
ID Code:5311
Deposited By: Alkhalifa, Dr Eshaa
Deposited On:22 Dec 2006
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

F. AlBalooshi & E. M. Alkhalifa (2002), Evaluating Multi-Media Educational Software: The DAST Experience, Proceedings of the 2002 Information Resources Management Association International Conference, IRMA 2002, to appear, Seattle, Washington.

E. M. Alkhalifa, Why Re-Invent the Wheel? Insights from Cognitive Research on Continued Education in Logic, A Millennium Dawn in Training and Continuing Education (conference and exhibition), 2001.

M. D. Byrne, R. Catrambone, J. T. Stasko, Evaluating animation as student aids in learning computer algorithms, Computers and Education, 1999, v. 33(4) pp. 253-278.

J. W. French, R. B. Ekstrom, L. A. Price, Kit of reference tests for cognitive factors, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services, 1963.

J. Freyd, Dynamic Mental Representations, Psychological Review, 1987, v.94(4), pp.427-438.

W. R. van (Jooligan)Jooligen, Cognitive tools for discovery learning, International Journal for Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1999, v.10, pp. 385-397.

A. W. Lawrence, A. N. Badre, J. T. Stasko, Empirically Evaluating the Use of Animation to Teach Algorithms, Georgia Institute of Technology, Technical Report GIT-GVU-94-07, Atlanta, 1994.

P. Monaghan, K. Stenning, Effects of representation modality and thinking style on learning to solve reasoning problems, In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Madison Wisconsin, 1998.

D. Norman, The design of everyday things, New York: Currency/ Doubleday, 1988.

J. F. Pane, A. T. Corbett, B. E. John, Assessing Dynamics in Computer-Based Instruction, In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vacouver, B.C. Canada, April 1996, pp.197-204.

M. Sharples, B. du Boulay, Knowledge representation, teaching strategy and simplifying assumptions for a concept tutoring system. In Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1988, pp. 268-270.


Repository Staff Only: item control page