Cogprints
Login | Create Account

Bibliographic Displays in Web Catalogs: Does Conformity to Design Guidelines Correlate with User Performance?

Cherry, Joan M. and Muter, Paul and Szigeti, Steve J. (2006) Bibliographic Displays in Web Catalogs: Does Conformity to Design Guidelines Correlate with User Performance? [Journal (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
1705Kb

Abstract

The present study investigated whether there is a correlation between user performance and compliance with screen-design guidelines found in the literature. Rather than test individual guidelines and their interactions, the authors took a more holistic approach and tested a compilation of guidelines. Nine bibliographic display formats were scored using a checklist of eighty-six guidelines. Twenty-seven participants completed ninety search tasks using the displays in a simulated Web environment. None of the correlations indicated that user performance was statistically significantly faster with greater conformity to guidelines. In some cases, user performance was actually significantly slower with greater conformity to guidelines. In a supplementary study, a different set of forty-three guidelines and the user performance data from the main study were used. Again, none of the correlations indicated that user performance was statistically significantly faster with greater conformity to guidelines.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:guidelines interface design displays
Subjects:Psychology > Applied Cognitive Psychology
Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
Computer Science > Human Computer Interaction
ID Code:5244
Deposited By:Muter, Prof. Paul
Deposited On:28 Oct 2006
Last Modified:19 Dec 2009 19:22

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. See, for example, A. Chapanis, “Some Generalizations About Generalization,” Human Factors 30, no. 3 (1988): 253–67.

2. T. S. Tullis, “Screen Design,” in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, ed. M. Helander (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988), 377–411; T. S. Tullis, “Screen Design,” in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2d ed., eds. M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, and P. Prabhu (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997), 503–31.

3. W. O. Galitz, Handbook of Screen Format Design, 2d ed. (Wellesley Hills, Mass.: QED Information Sciences, 1985); S. L. Smith and J. N. Mosier, Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software, Technical Report ESD-TR-86-278 (Hanscom Air Force Base, Mass.: USAF Electronic Systems Division, 1986).

4. C. Chariton and M. Choi, “User Interface Guidelines for Enhancing the Usability of Airline Travel Agency e-Commerce Web Sites,” CHI ‘02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 20–25, 2002 (Minneapolis, Minn.: ACM Press), 676–77, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=506443.506541 (accessed Dec. 28, 2005); M. G. Wadlow, “The Andrew System; The Role of Human Interface Guidelines in the Design of Multimedia Applications,” Current Psychology: Research and Reviews 9 (Summer 1990): 181–91; J. Kim and J. Lee, “Critical Design Factors for Successful e-Commerce Systems,” Behaviour and Information Technology 21, no. 3 (2002): 185–99; S. Giltuz and J. Nielsen, Usability of Web Sites for Children: 70 Design Guidelines (Fremont, Calif.: Nielsen Norman Group, 2002); Juliana Chan, “Evaluation of Formats Used to Display Bibliographic Records in OPACs in Canadian Academic and Public Libraries,” Master of Information Science Research Project Report (University of Toronto: Faculty of Information Studies, 1995); M. C. Maquire, “A Review of User-Interface Design Guidelines for Public Information Kiosk Systems,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 50, no. 3 (1999): 263–86.

5. National Cancer Institute, Research-based Web Design and Usability Guidelines (2001), www.usability.gov/guidelines/index.html (accessed Dec. 28, 2005).

6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research-based Web Design and Usability Guidelines (2003), http://usability.gov/pdfs/guidelines.html (accessed Dec. 28, 2005).

7. L. J. Cronbach, “Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology,” American Psychologist 30, no. 2 (1975): 116–27.

8. P. Muter, “Interface Design and Optimization of Reading of Continuous Text,” in Cognitive Aspects of Electronic Text Processing, eds. H. van Oostendorp and S. de Mul (Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 1996), 161–80; J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, “A SIMPLEX Method for Function Minimization,” Computer Journal 7, no. 4 (1965): 308–13; T. K. Landauer, “Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction,” in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, ed. M. Helander (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988), 905–28; R. N. Shepard, “Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science,” Science 237 (Sept. 11, 1987): 1317–323.

9. J. D. D’Angelo and J. Twining, “Comprehension by Clicks: D’Angelo Standards for Web Page Design, and Time, Comprehension, and Preference,” Information Technology and Libraries 19, no. 3 (2000): 125–35.

10. J. D. D’Angelo and S. K. Little, “Successful Web Pages: What are They and Do They Exist?” Information Technology and Libraries 17, no. 2 (1998): 71–81.

11. D’Angelo and Twining, “Comprehension by Clicks.”

12. J. Gerhardt-Powals, “Cognitive Engineering Principles for Enhancing Human-Computer Performance,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 8, no. 2 (1996): 189–211.

13. Chan, “Evaluation of Formats.”

14. Ibid.

15. Joan M. Cherry and Joseph P. Cox, “World Wide Web Displays of Bibliographic Records: An Evaluation,” Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science (Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Association for Information Science, 1996), 101–14.

16. Joan M. Cherry, “Bibliographic Displays in OPACs and Web Catalogs: How Well Do They Comply with Display Guidelines?” Information Technology and Libraries 17, no. 3 (1998): 124–37; Cherry and Cox, “World Wide Web Displays of Bibliographic Records.”

17. V. Herrero-Solana and F. De Moya-Anegón, “Bibliographic Displays of Web-Based OPACs: Multivariate Analysis Applied to Latin-American Catalogs,” Libri 51 (June 2001): 75–85.

18. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research-based Web Design and Usability Guidelines, xxi.

19. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs)—Part 11: Guidance on Usability (Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 1998); International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9241-12: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs)—Part 12: Presentation of Information (Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 1997); International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9241-14: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs)—Part 14: Menu Dialogues (Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 1997).

20. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research-based Web Design and Usability Guidelines.

21. Ivan Illich, Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health (Harmondsworth, N.Y.: Penguin, 1976).

22. D’Angelo and Twining, “Comprehension by Clicks”; Gerhardt-Powals, “Cognitive Engineering Principles.”

23. C. Cheepen, “Guidelines for Dialogue Design—What is Our Approach? Working Design Guidelines for Advanced Voice Dialogues Project. Paper 3,” (1996), www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/research/reports/voice-dialogues/wp3.html (accessed Dec. 29, 2005).

24. W. Crawford, “Webcats and Checklists: Some Cautionary Notes,” Information Technology and Libraries 18, no. 2, (1999): 100–03; Cherry, “Bibliographic Displays in OPACs and Web Catalogs.”

25. P. Reed et al., “User Interface Guidelines and Standards: Progress, Issues, and Prospects,” Interacting with Computers 12, no. 1 (1999): 119–42.

26. D. C. L. Ngo, L. S. Teo, and J. G. Byrne, “Formalizing Guidelines for the Design of Screen Layouts,” Displays 21, no. 1 (2000): 3–15.

27. D. A. Norman, “Emotion and Design: Attractive Things Work Better,” Interactions 9, no. 4 (2002): 36–42.

28. N. Tractinsky, A. S. Katz, D. Ikar, “What is Beautiful is Usable,” Interacting with Computers 13, no. 2 (2000): 127–45.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.