Cogprints

Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Reynolds, Dwight W and Jayaprasad, N and Francis, Johnson (2006) Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator. [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]HTML
21Kb
[img]
Preview
PDF
125Kb

Abstract

The rate of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation has gone up as primary and secondary prevention trials have relatively consistently shown significant improvement in mortality and morbidity. Most patients with ICDs are followed routinely at intervals ranging from 3 to 6 months. Many patients require additional non-scheduled visits to investigate symptoms that may or may not relate to their cardiac disease or device. Appropriate and inappropriate therapies of implantable cardioverter defibrillators have a major impact on morbidity and quality of life in ICD recipients. Remote monitoring systems can substitute for routine follow-up visits and/ or deliver continuous diagnostic and device status information. Remote monitoring of ICDs can decrease the need for many patient visits and, thereby, probably reduce expense.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, telemonitoring, internet based monitoring
Subjects:JOURNALS > Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
ID Code:5240
Deposited By:Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology, Journal
Deposited On:28 Oct 2006
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Furman S, Escher DJW. Transtelephone pacemaker monitoring. In: Schaldach M, Furman S, eds. Advances in Pacemaker Technology. Berlin: Springer 1975: 177–94.

2. Grom A, Baron TW, Faber TS, Brunner M, Bode C, Zehender M. Clusters of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators:

prevalence, characteristics, and risk stratification. Clin Cardiol 2001; 24: 330–3.

3. Grimm W, Flores BF, Marchlinski FE. Electrocardiographically documented unnecessary, spontaneous shocks in 241 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1992; 15: 1667–73.

4. Schoenfeld MH, Compton SJ, Mead RH et al. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a prospective analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27:757-63

5. Joseph GK, Wilkoff BL, Dresing T, Burkhardt J, Khaykin Y. Remote interrogation and monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2004;11:161-6.

6. Perings C, Klein G, Toft E et al. The RIONI study rationale and design: validation of the first stored electrograms transmitted via home monitoring in patients with implantable defibrillators. Europace. 2006;8:288-92

7. Ellery S, Pakrashi T, Paul V, Sack S. Predicting mortality and rehospitalization in heart failure patients with Home Monitoring: The Home CARE pilot study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006;95(Supplement 3):iii29-iii35.

8. Fauchier L, Sadoul N, Kouakam C et al. Potential cost savings by telemedicine-assisted long-term care of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28 Suppl 1:S255-9.

9. Dressing TJ, Schott R, McDowell C, et al. Transtelephonic ICD follow-up is better: more comprehensive, less intrusive and more desirable (abstract). Pacing Clin electrophysiol 2002; 24: 577.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page