Diastolic And Systolic Right Ventricular Dysfunction Precedes Left Ventricular Dysfunction In Patients Paced From Right Ventricular Apex

SK, Dwivedi and Bansal, Sandeep and Puri, Aniket and MK, Makharia and VS, Narain and RK, Saran and M, Hasan and VK, Puri (2006) Diastolic And Systolic Right Ventricular Dysfunction Precedes Left Ventricular Dysfunction In Patients Paced From Right Ventricular Apex. [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:



Background: Cardiac dysfunction after right ventricular (RV) apical pacing is well known but its extent, time frame of appearance and individual effect on left ventricular (LV), RV systolic and diastolic parameters has not evaluated in a systematic fashion. Methods: Patients with symptomatic bradycardia and ACC-AHA Class I indication for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) were implanted a single chamber (VVI) pacemaker. They were followed prospectively by echocardiographic examination which was done at baseline, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months after implantation. Parameters observed were chamber dimensions (M-line), chamber volumes, cardiac output (modified Simpson's method), systolic functions (ejection fraction, pre-ejection period, ejection time and ratio) and diastolic functions( isovolumic relaxation time & deceleration time) of left and right heart. Results: Forty eight consecutive patients (mean age 65.6±11.8 yrs, 66.7% males, mean EF 61.82±10.36%) implanted a VVI pacemaker were enrolled in this study. The first significant change to appear in cardiac function after VVI pacing was in diastolic properties of RV as shown by increase in RV isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) from 65.89±15.93 to 76.58±17.00 ms,(p<0.001) at 1week and RV deceleration time (DT) from 133.84±38.13 to 153.09±31.41 ms, (p=0.02) at 1 month. Increase in RV internal dimension (RVID) from 1.26±0.41 to 1.44±0.44, (p<0.05) was also noticed at 1 week. The LV diastolic parameters were significantly altered after 1 month with increase in LV-IVRT from 92.36±21.47 to 117.24±27.21ms, (p<0.001) and increase in LV DT from 147.56±31.84 to 189.27±28.49ms,(p<0.01). This was followed by LV systolic abnormality which appeared at 6 months with an increase in LVPEP from 100.33±14.43 to 118.41±21.34ms, (p<0.001) and increase in LVPEP/LVET ratio from 0.34±0.46 to 0.44±0.10, (p<0.001)]. The reduction in LV EF was manifested at 6 months falling from 61.82±10.36% to52.52±12.11%, (p<0.05) without any significant change in the resting cardiac output. Conclusion: The present study shows that dysfunction of right ventricle is the first abnormality that occurs in VVI paced patients, which manifests by 1 week followed by LV dysfunction which starts appearing by 1 month and the diastolic dysfunctions precede the systolic dysfunction in both ventricles.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:diastolic dysfunction; systolic dysfunction; left ventricle; right ventricle; RV apical pacing
Subjects:JOURNALS > Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
ID Code:5210
Deposited By:Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology, Journal
Deposited On:28 Oct 2006
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Samet P, Bernstein WH, Nathan, DA et al. Atrial contribution to cardiac output in complete heart block. Am J Cardiol 1965; 16: 1-10.

2. Samet P, Benstein WH, Levine S. Significance of the atrial contribution to ventricular filling. Am J Cardiol 1965; 15: 105-202.

3. Gambhir DS, Khalilullah M. Physiological pacing. Indian Heart Journal 1983; 35(2): 123-127.

4. Mohan JC, Sethi KK, Arora R, Khalliluah M. Comparative evaluation of left ventricular function in sick sinus syndrome on different long term pacing modes. Indian Heart Journal 1994; 46(6): 303-6.

5. Nathan AW, Davies DW. Is VVI pacing outmoded? Br Heart J 1992; 67: 285-8.

6. Anderson HR, Theusen L, Bagger JP et al. Prospective randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick sinus syndrome. Lancet 1994; 344; 1523-28.

7. Fehrsson SK, Astrom D, Bone D. Left ventricular volumes with ventricular inhibited and atrial triggered ventricular pacing. Acta Med Scand 1983; 214(4): 305-10

8. Fu XH. A comparative study of patients with VVI and AAI pacing by equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography. Chung Hua Hsin Kuan Ping Tsa Chin 1993; 21: 222-54.

9. Dreifus LS, Fisch C, Griffin JC et al. Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and arrhythmia devices. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 1-13.

10. Travill CM, Sutton R. Pacemaker syndrome: an iatrogenic condition. Br Heart J 1992; 68: 1936.

11. Heldman D, Mulvihilli D, Nguyen H et al. True incidence of pacemaker syndrome. PACE 1990; 13(2): 1742-50.

12. Spain MG, Smith MD, Grayburn PA, Harlamert EA, DeMaria AN. Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation by Doppler color flow imaging: angiographic and haemodynamic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 585-590.

13. Faerestrand S, Ohm OJ. A time related study by Doppler and M mode echocardiography of haemodynamics, heart size and AV valvar functions during activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacing. PACE 1987; 10: 507-18.

14. LeClercq C, Gras D, Le Helloco A, et al. Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing. Am Heart J 1995;129: 1133- 1141.

15. Rosenqvist M, Issaz K, Botvinick EH et al. Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67: 148-156.

16. Vardas PE, Simantirakis EN, Parthenakis FI, et al. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy. PACE 1997; 20: 1762- 1768.

17. Boerth RC, Covell JW. Mechanical performance and efficiency of the left ventricle during ventricular pacing. Am J Physiology 1971; 221: 1986-91.

18. Burkhoff D, Oikawa RY, Sagawa K. Influence of pacing site on canine left ventricular contraction. Am J Physiology 1986; 251: H428-435.

19. Grines CL, Bashore TM, Boudoulas H et al. Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block: The effect of interventricular asynchrony. Circulation 1989; 79: 845-53.

20. Barold SS, Linhart JW, Hildner FJ et al. Haemodynamic comparison of endocardial pacing of outflow and inflow tracts of RV. Am J Cardiol 1969; 23: 697-701.

21. Karpawich PP, Mittal S. Comparative left ventricular function following atrial, septal and apical single chamber heart pacing in the young. PACE 1997 29: 1883-88.

22. Kolettis TM, Kremastinos DT, Kyriakides ZS, Tsirakos A, Toutouzas PK. Effects of atrial, ventricular, and atrioventricular sequential pacing on coronary flow reserve. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995;18:1628-35.

23. Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:744-9.

24. Adomian GE, Benzell J. Myofibrillar disarray produced in normal hearts by chronic electrical pacing. Am Heart J 1986; 112: 79-83.

25. Prinzen FW, Cheriex EC, Delhaas T et al. Asymmetric thickness of the left ventricular wall resulting from asynchronous electric activity. A study in dogs with ventricular pacing and in patients with LBBB. Am Heart J 1995; 130: 1045-53.

26. Karpawich PP, Justice CD, Chang CH et al. Septal ventricular in immature canine heart: a new perspective. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 837-33.

27. Litwin SE, Gorman GE, Huang SK. Effect of different pacing modes on left ventricular relaxation in closed chested dogs. PACE 1989; 12: 1070-76.

28. Bedotto JB, Grayburn PA, Black WH et al. Alterations in left ventricular relaxation during atrioventricular pacing in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 658-664.

29. Weidemann RA, Mathay RA. Cor pulmonale; in Heart Disease; Eugene Braunwald (editor) 4th Ed. Prism Books Pvt Ltd, 1997, pp. 1605.

30. Berisha S, Kastrati A, Goda A, Popa Y. Optimal value of filling pressure in the right side of the heart in acute right ventricular infarction. Br Heart J 1990; 63: 98-102.

31. Lopez-Sendon J, Garcia Femadez MG, Coma Canella I et al. Segmental right ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Two dimensional echocardiographic study in 63 patients. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51: 390-96.

32. Weber KT. Contractile mechanics and interaction of right and left ventricles. Am J Cardiol 1981; 47: 686-92.

33. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73: 13-22.


Repository Staff Only: item control page