Hubbard, Raymond and Armstrong, J. Scott (1994) Replications and Extensions in Marketing – Rarely Published But Quite Contrary. [Journal (Paginated)]
Full text available as:
| PDF 66Kb |
Abstract
Replication is rare in marketing. Of 1,120 papers sampled from three major marketing journals, none were replications. Only 1.8% of the papers were extensions, and they consumed 1.1% of the journal space. On average, these extensions appeared seven years after the original study. The publication rate for such works has been decreasing since the 1970s. Published extensions typically produced results that conflicted with the original studies; of the 20 extensions published, 12 conflicted with the earlier results, and only 3 provided full confirmation. Published replications do not attract as many citations after publication as do the original studies, even when the results fail to support the original studies.
| Item Type: | Journal (Paginated) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Psychology > Behavioral Analysis |
| ID Code: | 5199 |
| Deposited By: | Armstrong, J. Scott |
| Deposited On: | 05 Oct 2006 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Sep 2007 18:07 |
References in Article
Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.
Metadata
- HTML Citation
- ASCII Citation
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- OpenURL ContextObject
- EndNote
- BibTeX
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- MODS
- DIDL
- EP3 XML
- Dublin Core
- Reference Manager
- Eprints Application Profile
- Simple Metadata
- Refer
- METS
Repository Staff Only: item control page

