Armstrong, J. Scott and Green, Kesten C. (2006) Competitor-oriented Objectives: The Myth of Market Share. [Journal (Paginated)] (Unpublished)
Full text available as:
| PDF 122Kb |
Abstract
Competitor-oriented objectives, such as market-share targets, are promoted by academics and are commonly used by firms. A 1996 review of the evidence, summarized in this paper, indicated that competitor-oriented objectives reduce profitability. However, we found that this evidence has been ignored by managers. We then describe evidence from 12 new studies, one of which is introduced in this paper. This evidence supports the conclusion that competitor-oriented objectives are harmful, especially when managers receive information about market shares of competitors. Unfortunately, we expect that many firms will continue to use competitor-oriented objectives to the detriment of their profitability.
| Item Type: | Journal (Paginated) |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | competition, market share, objectives, profitability |
| Subjects: | Psychology > Behavioral Analysis |
| ID Code: | 5196 |
| Deposited By: | Armstrong, J. Scott |
| Deposited On: | 05 Oct 2006 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Sep 2007 18:07 |
References in Article
Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.
Metadata
- HTML Citation
- ASCII Citation
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- ID Plus Text Citation
- OpenURL ContextObject
- EndNote
- BibTeX
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- MODS
- DIDL
- EP3 XML
- Dublin Core
- Reference Manager
- Eprints Application Profile
- Simple Metadata
- Refer
- METS
- Search Data Dump
Repository Staff Only: item control page

