Cogprints
Login | Create Account

Does the Need for Agreement Among Reviewers Inhibit the Publication of Controversial Findings?

Armstrong, J. Scott and Hubbard, Raymond (1991) Does the Need for Agreement Among Reviewers Inhibit the Publication of Controversial Findings? [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
23Kb

Abstract

As Cicchetti indicates, agreement among reviewers is not high. This conclusion is empirically supported by Fiske and Fogg (1990), who reported that two independent reviews of the same papers typically had no critical point in common. Does this imply that journal editors should strive for a high level of reviewer consensus as a criterion for publication? Prior research suggests that such a requirement would inhibit the publication of papers with controversial findings. We summarize this research and report on a survey of editors.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Subjects:Neuroscience > Behavioral Neuroscience
ID Code:5182
Deposited By:Armstrong, J. Scott
Deposited On:25 Sep 2006
Last Modified:12 Sep 2007 18:07

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Armstrong, J. S. (1982a), “Barriers to scientific contributions: The author’s formula,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 197-199.

Armstrong, J. S. (1982b), “Is review by peers as fair as it appears?” Interfaces, 12, 62-74.

Armstrong, J. S. (1982c), “Research on scientific journals: Implications for editors and authors,” Journal of Forecasting, 1, 83-104.

Fisher, A. (1989), “Seeing atoms,” Popular Science, 102-07.

Fiske, D. W. and L. Fogg (1990), “But the reviewers are aking different criticisms of my paper! Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments,” American Psychologist, 45, 591-598.

Horrobin, D. F. (1990), “The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation,” Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 1438-1441.

Mahoney, M. J. (1977), “Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system,” Cognitive Therapy Research hh, 1, 161- 175.

McNutt, R. A., A. T. Evans, R. H. Fletcher, and S. W. Fletcher (1990), “The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review,” Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 137-176.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.