Cogprints

Pulsed Ultrasound Does Not Affect Recovery From Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness

Shankar, Gauri and A G, Sinha and J S, Sandhu (2006) Pulsed Ultrasound Does Not Affect Recovery From Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
209Kb

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effects of pulsed Ultrasound (US) in recovery from Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS). Methods: Twelve healthy male athletes (mean age 23.83±1.697 year) performed an eccentric exercise protocol of non-dominant elbow flexors to induce muscle soreness on 2 occasions separated by 3 weeks. Subjects in experimental group received pulsed US (1 MHz, intensity 0.8 W/cm2, mark space ratio 1:10), whereas control group received sham US after 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Perception of muscle soreness, active ROM and muscle strength were the parameters measured at 0 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h with the help of VAS, manual goniometer and JONEX muscles master instrument respectively. Results: Post hoc t test analysis revealed significant differences (p <0.05) between 0 h and 72 h in the parameter of ROM (t = 6.18) and muscle power (t = 2.54) as well as between 24 h and 48 h in the parameter of muscle soreness (t = 3.13) in control group. Similar differences were also observed in the experimental group. No significant inter-group differences at α level of 0.05 was observed in any parameter at any level. Conclusion: The pattern of recovery from DOMS was not influenced by the application of pulsed Ultrasound at the parameters discussed here.

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:Ultrasound, Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness
Subjects:JOURNALS > Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences
ID Code:5003
Deposited By:Kakkilaya Bevinje, Dr. Srinivas
Deposited On:16 Jul 2006
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Newham DJ, McPhail G, Mills KR, et al. Ultrastructural changes after concentric and eccentric contractions of human muscle. J Neurol Sci. 1983;61:109-22.

2. Hasson S, Mundorf R, Barnes W, et al. Effect of pulsed ultrasound versus placebo on muscle soreness perception and muscular performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1990;22(4):199-205.

3. Craig JA, Bradley J, Walsh DM, et al. Delayed onset muscle soreness : Lack of effect of therapeutic ultrasound in humans. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(3):318-23.

4. Plaskett C, Tiidus P, Livingston L. Ultrasound treatment does not affect postexercise muscle strength recovery or soreness. J Sports Rehab. 1999;8:1-9.

5. Ciccone CD, Leggin BE, Callamaro JJ. Effects of ultrasound and trolamine salicylate phonophoresis on delayed onset muscle soreness. Phys Ther. 1991;71(9):666-75, discussion 675-78.

6. Holmes MAM, Rudland JR. Clinical trials of ultrasound treatment in soft tissue injury : a review critique. Physiother Theory Pract. 1991;7:163-75.

7. Young S. Ultrasound therapy. In: Kitchen S. Bazin S. editors. Clayton’s electrotherapy. 10th ed. London : WB Saunders. 1996. p. 243-67.

8. Howell JN, Chila AG, Ford G, et al. An electromyographic study of elbow motion during post exercise muscle soreness. J Appl Physiol. 1985;58:1713-18.

9. Mekjavic IB, Exner JA, Tesch PA, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy does not affect recovery from delayed onset muscle soreness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(3):558-63.

10. Cleak MJ, Eston RE. Muscle soreness, swelling, stiffness and strength loss after intense eccentric exercise. Br J Sp Med. 1992;26(4):267-72

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page