Cogprints

How qualia can be physical

Nicholson, Mr Dennis (2006) How qualia can be physical. [Preprint]

Full text available as:

[img] HTML
60Kb

Abstract

Assume that a quale as we experience it is a perspective on an underlying physical state, rather than the physical state as such – the reality as known as distinct from the reality as such. Assume, further, that this inner perspective is integral to, and materially co-extensive with, the physical state itself. Assume, finally, that the physical state in question is known as a brain state of a particular kind by an external observer of the brain in which it occurs. The result is a perspective in which a quale is entirely physical; a position that resolves several known difficulties for physicalism, including those associated with the explanatory gap, Jackson’s knowledge argument, and Chalmers’ hard problem of consciousness.

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:qualia, mind-body problem, identity theory, hard problem, knowledge argument
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
ID Code:4786
Deposited By: Nicholson, Dennis
Deposited On:18 Mar 2006
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Alter, T. 2006. The Knowledge Argument. Forthcoming in Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, eds. Schneider, S. And Velmans, M. Available at http://www.as.ua.edu/philos/talter/The Knowledge Argument.pdf

Borst, C.V. 1970. The Mind-Brain IdentityTheory. London: MacMillan.

Chalmers, D. J. 1995. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3):200-219

Chalmers, D. J. 1996. The Conscious Mind. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chalmers, D.J. 2003. Consciousness and its Place in Nature. In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind, eds. Stich, S and Warfield, F. Oxford: Blackwell

Deutsch, M. 1999. Subjective Physical Facts. Paper given at conference on The Conscious Mind, University of Buffalo, 1999. Available at http://www.neologic.net/rd/chalmers/mdeutsch.html.

Himma, K.E. 2005. What is a Problem for All is a Problem for None: Substance Dualism, Physicalism, and the Mind-Body Problem. American Philosophical Quarterly. 42(2):81-92.

Horowitz, A. and Jacobson-Horowitz, H. 2005. The Knowledge argument And Higher-Order Properties. Ratio. XVIII:48-64.

Jackson, F. 1982. Epiphenomenal Qualia. Philosophical Quarterly. 32:127-36.

Jackson, F. 1986. What Mary Didn't Know. The Journal of Philosophy. 83:291-95.

Jackson, F. 2003. Mind and Illusion. In Minds and Persons, ed. O’Hear, A. 251-271.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McGinn, C. 1989. Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem, Mind, 98, 891:349-366.

Papineau, D. 1993. Physicalism, Consciousness, and the Antipathetic Fallacy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 71(2):169-182.

Shoemeaker, S. 1999. (and following papers) On David Chalmers’s The Conscious Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. LIX(2):439-472.

Strawson, G. 1994. Mental Reality. Cambridge, Mass: the MIT Press, Bradford Books.

Tye, M. 1999. Phenomenal Consciousness: The Explanatory Gap As A Cognitive Illusion. Mind. 108, 432: 705-725.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.