In Search of an Integrated Logic of Conviction and Intention

Hoche, Prof. em. Dr. Hans-Ulrich (2004) In Search of an Integrated Logic of Conviction and Intention. [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:



According to a two-level criterion for combination tests in the field of ordinary language (C-CT), moral 'ought'-sentences may be taken to imply 'I intend'-sentences partly semantically and partly pragmatically. If so, a trenchant linguistic analysis of the concept of moral obligation cannot do without a non-classical logic which allows to model these important kinds of ordinary-language implications by means of purely syntactical derivations. For this purpose, an integrated logic of conviction and intention has been tentatively devised by way of a doxastically, buletically, and pragmatically extended calculus of natural deduction. This system of buletic logic cannot even be launched without one or two derivation rules of deductive closedness. However, these very closedness rules appear to be responsible for buletic paradoxes which are analogous to paradoxes long since known from other, less exotic branches of logic but at first sight look much more virulent. After having scrutinized two potential strategies for coping with the paradoxes of buletic logic, finally we can convince ourselves that these paradoxes, as well as their familiar non-buletic counterparts, are but apparent paradoxes, provided we consistently lean on C-CT and do not let pragmatical considerations intrude into purely logical ones.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:Combination tests, deductive closedness, doxastic logic, entailment, Hare, logical paradoxes, logic of willing and believing, metaethics, moral obligation, natural deduction, 'ought'-sentences, pragmatical implication, pragmatical vs. logical considerations
Subjects:Philosophy > Logic
ID Code:4756
Deposited By:Hoche, Prof. em. Dr. Hans-Ulrich
Deposited On:06 Mar 2006
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

BARNETT, Dene (1974): ‘A New Semantical Theory of Egocentric Particulars’. In: Synthese 28 (1974) 533-547.

BLAU, Ulrich (1969): Glauben und Wissen. Eine Untersuchung zur epistemischen Logik [Believing and knowing. An enquiry into epistemic logic]. Doctoral thesis, University of Munich.

DUDDA, Friedrich (1999): Die Logik der Sprache der Moral [The logic of the language of morals]. Paderborn: mentis.

DUMMETT, Michael (1978): Truth and other enigmas. London: Duckworth.

GAZDAR, Gerald (1979): Pragmatics. Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.

GRICE, H. P. (1961): ‘The Causal Theory of Perception’. Reprinted in: G. J. Warnock (ed.), The Philosophy of Perception, Oxford University Press, 1967, pp. 85-112.

 (1975): ‘Logic and Conversation’. In: Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.

HARE, Richard Mervyn (1967): ‘Some Alleged Differences between Imperatives and Indicatives’. Reprinted in: Hare, Practical Inferences, London & Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1971, pp. 25-43.

 (1952): The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon.

 (1963): Freedom and Reason. Oxford University Press.

 (1981): Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Clarendon.

HINTIKKA, Jaakko (1962): Knowledge and Belief. An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.

HOCHE, Hans-Ulrich (1973): Handlung, Bewusstsein und Leib. Vorstudien zu einer rein noematischen Phänomenologie [Action, consciousness, and body. Prolegomena to a purely noematic phenomenology]. Freiburg / Munich: Karl Alber.

 (1981): ‘Zur Methodologie von Kombinationstests in der analytischen Philosophie’ [‘On the methodology of combination tests in analytical philosophy’]. In: Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 12 (1981) 28-54.

 (1990): Einführung in das sprachanalytische Philosophieren [Introduction to doing philosophy in a linguistic key]. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

 (1992a): Elemente einer Anatomie der Verpflichtung. Pragmatisch-wollenslogische Grundlegung einer Theorie des moralischen Argumentierens [Elements of an anatomy of obligation. Groundwork of a theory of moral reasoning, based on pragmatics and a logic of willing]. Freiburg / Munich: Karl Alber.

 (1992b): ‘Regel, goldene II: Die g. R. seit Kant’ [‘Rule, Golden, II: The G. R. since Kant’]. In: Joachim Ritter & Karlfried Gruender (eds.), Historisches Woerterbuch der Philosophie [Historical encyclopaedia of philosophy], Vol. 8, Basel: Schwabe, 1992, col. 457-464.

 (1995a): ‘Universal Prescriptivism Revised; or: The Analyticity of the Golden Rule’. In: Revista Filosófica de Coimbra 4 (No 8, Oktober 1995) 337-363.

 (1995b): ‘Ein Problem des universellen Präskriptivismus: Implizieren Verpflichtungssätze Imperative logisch-semantisch oder “Ich-Will”-Sätze pragmatisch?’ [‘A problem of universal prescriptivism: Do “ought”-sentences entail imperatives, or do they pragmatically imply “I intend”-sentences?] In: Christoph Fehige & Georg Meggle (eds.), Zum moralischen Denken [On moral thinking]. Frankfurt am Main [Frankfort]: Suhrkamp, 1995, Vol. 1, pp. 229-253.

 (1995c): ‘Will man alles, was logisch wahr ist? Zu einem Einwand Nortmanns gegen die pragmatisch-wollenslogische Analyse des Verpflichtungsbegriffs’ [‘Do we want everything that is logically true? In reply to an objection of Nortmann’s against analyzing the concept of moral obligation by means of a pragmatico-buletic logic’]. In: Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics 3 (1995) 415-422.

 (1995d): ‘Was kann die logische Analyse von Identitätsaussagen zur Lösung des Leib-Seele-Problems beitragen?’ [‘What the logical analysis of identity statements can contribute to solving the mind-body problem’]. Circulated ms. (Lecture given at the University of Freiburg, Germany, on June 13, 1995.)

 (1999): ‘Pragmatisch-semantische Kombinationstests und die Möglichkeit einer Wollenslogik’ [‘Pragmatico-semantical combination tests and the possibility of a buletic logic’]. Circulated ms.

 (2001): ‘Eine wollenslogische Weiterentwicklung des Universellen Präskriptivismus und die Begründung der Goldenen Regel’ [‘A further development of universal prescriptivism by means of a logic of willing, and a proof of the golden rule’]. In: Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics 9 (2001) 325-376.

 (2002): ‘Zum Problem der deduktiven Geschlossenheit einer integrierten Wollens- und Glaubenslogik’ [‘On the problem of the deductive closedness of an integrated logic of willing and believing’]. Circulated ms.

 (2003): ‘Presupposition, Entailment, and Other Kinds of Linguistic Implication’. Circulated ms.

 & STRUBE, Werner (1985): Analytische Philosophie [Analytical philosophy]. Freiburg / Munich: Karl Alber (= Handbuch Philosophie [Handbook of philosophy], ed. by E. Stroeker & W. Wieland, Vol. 6.)

KNOOP, Michael (2001): Personal communication to the author, June 24, 2001.

 (2002): Personal communication to the author, May 3, 2002.

 (2003a): ‘Präsupposition und logische Implikation bei Strawson’ [‘Strawson on Presupposition and Entailment’]. Circulated ms.

 (2003b): Personal communication to the author, June 6, 2003.

LENZEN, Wolfgang (1980): Glauben, Wissen und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Systeme der epistemischen Logik [Belief, knowledge, and probability. Systems of epistemic logic]. Wien / New York: Springer.

LEWIS, Clarence Irving & LANGFORD, Cooper Harold (1932): Symbolic Logic. New York: Dover, Second edition 1959.

MATES, Benson (1965): Elementary Logic. Oxford University Press.

MOORE, George Edward (1944): ‘Russell’s “Theory of Descriptions”’. Reprinted in: Moore, Philosophical Papers, London / New York: Allen & Unwin / Macmillan, 1959, pp. 151-195.

NORTMANN, Ulrich (1994): ‘Über einen vermuteten Zusammenhang von Müssen und Wollen. Diskussion der Monographie von Hans-Ulrich Hoche: Elemente einer Anatomie der Verpflichtung’ [‘On a supposed connection between being under a moral obligation and intending. Discussion of the monograph by Hans-Ulrich Hoche: Elements of an anatomy of obligation’]. In: Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics 2 (1994) 539-551.

PRIOR, A. N. (1967): ‘Logic, Modal’. In: Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York / London: Macmillan, 1967, Vol. 5, 5-12.

QUINE, Willard Van Orman (1960): Word and Object. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.

SEARLE, John R. (1983): Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press.

STRAWSON, Peter Frederick (1950): ‘On Referring’. Reprinted in: Strawson, Logico-Linguistic Papers, London, New York: Methuen, 1971 (University Paperback, Reprint 1980), pp. 1-27.

TAKAHASHI, Fumihiko (2000): Personal communication to the author, January 3, 2000.

WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig (1953): Philosophische Untersuchungen / Philosophical Investigations. Ed. by G. E. M. Anscombe et al., tr. by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

WOHLHUETER, William (1974): Logik und Wollen. Eine Untersuchung einiger formaler Eigenschaften umgangssprachlicher Wollensbegriffe [Logic and wanting. An enquiry into some formal properties of ordinary-language concepts of wanting]. Doctoral thesis 1973, University of Munich.


Repository Staff Only: item control page