Impact of a Right Ventricular Impedance Sensor on the Cardiovascular Responses to Exercise in Pacemaker Dependent Patients

Linnea, Cook and Corey, Tomczak and Edward, Busse and Tada, Hiroshi and John, Tsang and Wladyslaw, Wojcik and Robert, Haennel (2005) Impact of a Right Ventricular Impedance Sensor on the Cardiovascular Responses to Exercise in Pacemaker Dependent Patients. [Journal (Paginated)]

This is the latest version of this eprint.

Full text available as:



Background. The evaluation of the heart rate (HR) response to exercise is important for the assessment of the rate response algorithm of sensor-controlled pacemakers. This study examined the effects of a right ventricular impedance sensor driven pacemaker on the cardiovascular responses to incremental exercise in pacemaker dependent patients. Methods. Twelve patients (70.5 ± 9.5 years; 5 Females: 7 Males) implanted with an Inos2+ closed loop stimulation (CLS) pacemaker were compared to 12 healthy age and sex matched controls (70.6 ± 4.8 years). All subjects performed the chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP). Variables of interest included HR, cardiac output (Q), oxygen uptake (Vo2) and blood pressure (BP). Data were analyzed at rest, throughout exercise and during recovery. Furthermore, patient chronotropic responses were compared to a reference chronotropic response slope for aerobic exercise. Results. There were no differences between groups for HR or Q. response throughout exercise. At peak exercise, V.o2 ( was higher for the controls (p < 0.05). The patient chronotropic response slope was comparable to the CAEP reference slope from rest to both the anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak exercise. During recovery, no differences were observed between the groups for any parameters or for the HR decay slopes. Conclusions. Up to the anaerobic threshold, the right ventricular impedance sensor driven pacemaker delivered a pacing rate that contributed to an overall cardiovascular response similar to that observed in healthy age matched subjects.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:cardiac pacing; exercise responses; chronotropic reserve index
Subjects:JOURNALS > Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
ID Code:4487
Deposited By:Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology, Journal
Deposited On:11 Aug 2005
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

Available Versions of this Item

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Lu B, Wood M, Ellenbogen KA, Valenta HL, Jr. Correlation of an invasive measure of right ventricular pressure and mean arterial pressure. Biomed Sci Instrum 1990;26:137-40.

2. Malinowski K. Interindividual comparison of different sensor principles for rate adaptive pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:2209-13.

3 Guyomar Y, Graux P, Nicolas E ea. Inos2+ DR and neurocardiogenic syncope: First experiences in four cases. Progress in Biomedical Research 1998;3:152-155.

4. Osswald S, Cron T, Gradel C, Hilti P, Lippert M, Strobel J, Schaldach M, Buser P, Pfisterer M. Closed-loop stimulation using intracardiac impedance as a sensor principle: correlation of right ventricular dP/dtmax and intracardiac impedance during dobutamine stress test. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:1502-8.

5. Ovsyshcher I, Guetta V, Bondy C, Porath A. First derivative of right ventricular pressure, dP/dt, as a sensor for a rate adaptive VVI pacemaker: initial experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1992;15:211-8.

6. Wilkoff B, Corey J, Blackburn G. A mathematical model of the cardiac chronotropic response to exercise. Journal of Electrophysiology 1989;3:176-180.

7. ACSM. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.

8. Alt E. A protocol for treadmill and bicycle stress testing designed for pacemaker patients. Stimucoer 1987;15:33-35.

9. Meine M, Achtelik M, Hexamer M, Kloppe A, Werner J, Trappe HJ. Assessment of the chronotropic response at the anaerobic threshold: an objective measure of chronotropic function. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:1457-67.

10. Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ. A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 1986;60:2020-7.

11. Wasserman K, Hansen J, Sue D, Whipp B, Casaburi R. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. Philidelphia.: Lea & Febiger, 1994.

12. Bernstein DP. A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: theory and rationale. Crit Care Med 1986;14:904-9.

13. Hetherington M, Haennel R, Teo KK, Kappagoda T. Importance of considering ventricular function when prescribing exercise after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:891-5.

14. Teo KK, Hetherington MD, Haennel RG, Greenwood PV, Rossall RE, Kappagoda T. Cardiac output measured by impedance cardiography during maximal exercise tests. Cardiovasc Res 1985;19:737-43.

15. Ovsyshcher I, Gross JN, Blumberg S, Furman S. Precision of impedance cardiography measurements of cardiac output in pacemaker patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1992;15:1923-6.

16. Miles DS, Gotshall RW. Impedance cardiography: noninvasive assessment of human central hemodynamics at rest and during exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1989;17:231-63.

17. Jones N, Campbell E. Clinical Exercise Testing. Toronto ON: W.B. Saunders, 1982.

18. Zar J. Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1999.

19. Astrand I. Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special reference to age. Acta Physiol Scand 1960;49(Suppl 169):1-92.

20. Kay GN. Quantitation of chronotropic response: comparison of methods for rate-modulating permanent pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1533-41.

21. Carmouche DG, Bubien RS, Kay GN. The effect of maximum heart rate on oxygen kinetics and exercise performance at low and high workloads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:679-86.

22. Page E, Bonnet JL, Durand C. Comparison of metabolic expenditure during CAEP versus a test adapted to aerobic capacity (Harbor test) in elderly healthy individuals. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:1772-7.

23. Freedman RA, Hopper DL, Mah J, Hummel J, Wilkoff BL. Assessment of pacemaker chronotropic response: implementation of the Wilkoff mathematical model. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001;24:1748-54.

24. Dailey SM, Bubien RS, Kay GN. Effect of chronotropic response pattern on oxygen kinetics. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994;17:2307-14.

25. Wasserman K, Hansen J, Sue D, Whipp B, Casaburi R. Pathophysiology of disorders limiting exercise. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. Philidelphia.: Lea & Febiger, 1994:80-94.

26. Haennel RG, Logan T, Dunne C, Burgess J, Busse E. Effects of sensor selection on exercise stroke volume in pacemaker dependent patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1700-8.

27. Leung SK, Lau CP, Wu CW, Leung WH, Tai YT, Lee I, Chow YH. Quantitative comparison of rate response and oxygen uptake kinetics between different sensor modes in multisensor rate adaptive pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994;17:1920-7.

28. Lewalter T, Rickli H, MacCarter D, Schwartze P, Schimpf R, Schumacher B, Jung W, Candinas R, Luderitz B. Oxygen uptake to work rate relation throughout peak exercise in normal subjects: relevance for rate adaptive pacemaker programming. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999;22:769-75.

29. Pendergast D, Cerretelli P, Rennie DW. Aerobic and glycolytic metabolism in arm exercise. J Appl Physiol 1979;47:754-60.

30. Hofmann P, Bunc V, Leitner H, Pokan R, Gaisl G. Heart rate threshold related to lactate turn point and steady-state exercise on a cycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1994;69:132-9.

31. Hofmann P, Pokan R, von Duvillard SP, Seibert FJ, Zweiker R, Schmid P. Heart rate performance curve during incremental cycle ergometer exercise in healthy young male subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29:762-8.

32. Pokan R, Hofmann P, Preidler K, Leitner H, Dusleag J, Eber B, Schwaberger G, Fuger GF, Klein W. Correlation between inflection of heart rate/work performance curve and myocardial function in exhausting cycle ergometer exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1993;67:385-8.

33. Lau CP, Wong CK, Cheng CH, Leung WH. Importance of heart rate modulation on the cardiac hemodynamics during postexercise recovery. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990;13:1277-85.

34. Zecchi P, Bellocci F, Ravazze A, Diotallevi P, Audoglio R. Closed Loop Stimulation: A new philosophy of pacing. Progress in Biomedical Research 2000;5:126-131.

35. Nishioka S, Martinelli M, Lopes H, Contim F, Costa R. Neurohumoral behavior in cardiac pacemaker patients controlled by the autonomic nervous system with closed loop stimulation. Progress in Biomedical Research 2000;5:284-291.

36. Clementy J, Garrigue S, Gencel L, Jais P, Shah D, Le Metayer P, Hocini M, Haissaguerre M. Evaluation of the chronotropic function of a closed-loop rate-responsive dual chamber driven by contractility. Progress in Biomedical Research. 1999;3:18-22.


Repository Staff Only: item control page