Cogprints
Login | Create Account

Searle's Chinese Room Argument

Harnad, Stevan (2003) Searle's Chinese Room Argument. [Book Chapter] (In Press)

Full text available as:

[img]HTML
17Kb

Abstract

Summary of Searle's "Chinese Room Argument" showing that cognition cannot be just computation. Searle implements a computer programme that can pass the Turing Test in Chinese. Searle does not understand Chinese in doing so, hence neither does the computer.

Item Type:Book Chapter
Keywords:searle, "chinese room argument," "strong AI," computations, cognition, turing test, computationalism, symbol grounding
Subjects:Psychology > Perceptual Cognitive Psychology
ID Code:4075
Deposited By:Harnad, Stevan
Deposited On:02 Feb 2005
Last Modified:12 Sep 2007 17:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Burns, E. M.; Campbell, S. L. (1994) Frequency and frequency-ratio resolution by possessors of absolute and relative pitch: Examples of categorical perception? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96: :2704-2719.

Belpaeme, Tony (2002) Factors influencing the origins of colour categories . PhD Thesis. Artificial Intelligence Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

http://arti.vub.ac.be/~tony/phd/index.htm

Berlin, B. & Kay, P. (1969) Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press

Bimler, D & Kirkland, J. (2001) Categorical perception of facial expressions of emotion: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Cognition & Emotion 15:633-658.

Cangelosi, A. & Harnad, S. (2001) The Adaptive Advantage of Symbolic Theft Over Sensorimotor Toil: Grounding Language in Perceptual Categories. Evolution of Communication 4(1) 117-142.

http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/20/36/index.html

Cangelosi A., Greco A. & Harnad S. (2000). From robotic toil to symbolic theft: Grounding transfer from entry-level to higher-level categories. Connection Science 12(2) 143-162.

http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/47/index.html

Calder, A.J., Young, A.W., Perrett, D.I., Etcoff, N.L. & Rowland, D. (1996). Categorical perception of morphed facial expressions. Visual Cognition 3: 81-117.

Campanella, S., Quinet, O., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M. & Guerit, J.M. (2002) Categorical perception of happiness and fear facial expressions : an ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2): 210-227.

Damper, R.I. & Harnad, S. (2000) Neural Network Modeling of Categorical Perception. Perception and Psychophysics 62(4): 843-867 http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/20/index.html

Eimas, P.D., Siqueland, E.R., Jusczyk, P.W., & Vigorito, J. (1971) Speech perception in infants. Science 171: 303-6.

Fodor, J. (1983), The modularity of mind. MIT Press.

Goldstone, R. L, Lippa, Y., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Altering object representations through category learning. Cognition 78: 27-43.

Goldstone, R. L. (1999). Similarity. in R.A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (eds.) MIT encylopedia of the cognitive sciences.(pp. 763-765).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Goldstone, R. L. (1994). Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178-200.

Guest, S. & Van Laar, D. (2000) The structure of colour naming space. Vision Research 40: 723-734.

Harnad, S. (ed.) (1987) Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/15/71/index.html

Harnad, S. (1990) The Symbol Grounding Problem Physica D 42: 335-346.

http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/06/15/index.html

Kotsoni, E; de Haan, M; Johnson, MH. (2001) Categorical perception of facial expressions by 7-month-old infants. Perception 30 :1115-1125.

Lane, H. (1965) The motor theory of speech perception: A critical review. Psychological Review 72: 275 - 309.

Lawrence, D. H. (1950) Acquired distinctiveness of cues: II. Selective association in a constant stimulus situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 40: 175 - 188.

Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S. & Griffith, B. C. (1957) The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54: 358 - 368.

Livingston, K. Andrews & Harnad, S. (1998). Categorical Perception Effects Induced by Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24(3) 732-753.

Kuhl, P. K. (1987) The Special-Mechanisms Debate in Speech Perception: Nonhuman Species and Nonspeech Signals. In S. Harnad (Ed.) Categorical perception: The groundwork of Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press

Pullum, G. K. (1989) The great eskimo vocabulary hoax. Natural Language and Ling uistic Theory 7: 275-281.

Pevtzow, R. & Harnad, S. (1997) Warping Similarity Space in Category Learning by Human Subjects: The Role of Task Difficulty. In: Ramscar, M., Hahn, U., Cambouropolos, E. & Pain, H. (Eds.) Proceedings of SimCat 1997: Interdisciplinary Workshop on Similarity and Categorization. Department of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh University: 189 - 195. http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/07/index.html

Roberson, D., Davies, I. & Davidoff, J. (2000) Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129: 369-398.

Rossion, B., Schiltz, C., Robaye, L., Pirenne, D. & Crommelinck, M. (2001). How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces ? A PET study of face categorical perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 1019-1034.

Schyns, P. G., Goldstone, R. L, & Thibaut, J. (1998). Development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-54.

Seger, Carol A.; Poldrack, Russell A.; Prabhakaran, Vivek; Zhao, Margaret; Glover, Gary H.; Gabrieli, John D. E. (2000)

Hemispheric asymmetries and individual differences in visual concept learning as measured by functional MRI. Neuropsychologia. 38(9):1316-1324.

Sharma, A. & Dorman, M.F. (1999) Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106(2) 1078-1083.

Steels, L. (2001) Language games for autonomous robots. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(5) 16-22.

Steels, L. and Kaplan, F. (1999) Bootstrapping Grounded Word Semantics. In: Briscoe, T. (ed.) (1999) Linguistic evolution through language acquisition: formal and computational models. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

Tijsseling, A. & Harnad, S. (1997) Warping Similarity Space in Category Learning by Backprop Nets. In: Ramscar, M., Hahn, U., Cambouropolos, E. & Pain, H. (Eds.) Proceedings of SimCat 1997: Interdisciplinary Workshop on Similarity and Categorization. Department of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh University: 263 - 269. http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/08/index.html

Whorf, B. L. (1964) Language, thought and reality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.