Cogprints

Toward a Bio-Cognitive Philosophy of Language

Kravchenko, Prof. A.V. (2002) Toward a Bio-Cognitive Philosophy of Language. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]HTML
38Kb

Abstract

It is argued that the theoretical and conceptual tangle in which linguistics finds itself at the turn of the century, is rooted in the methodological inadequacies of traditional (Cartesian) philosophy. A holistic approach, sustained by the accumulated empirical evidence and supported by the new epistemology of autopoiesis, is proposed, whereby language is viewed as adaptive functional activity based on an organism’s experience of the environment to which the organism stands in a relation of mutual causality.

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:epistemology, autopoiesis, holism, language function
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Language
Philosophy > Epistemology
ID Code:4002
Deposited By:Kravchenko, Professor Alexander
Deposited On:28 Dec 2004
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Albertazzi, L. (Ed.) (2000). Meaning and cognition. - John Benjamins.

Allwood, J. & Gaerdenfors, P. (Eds.) (1999). Cognitive semantics: Meaning and cognition. Amsterdam, Phila-delphia: John Benjamins.

Bickerton, D. (1990). Language & species. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.

Bod, R. (1998). Beyond grammar. An experience-based theory of language. CSLI Publications: Stanford, CA.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cam-bridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge UP.

Croft, W. (1998). Linguistic evidence and mental represen-tations. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, P. 151-173.

Dennett, D. (1996). Kinds of minds. New York: Basic Books.

Devitt, M., & Sterelny, K. (1999). Language and reality. An introduction to the philosophy of language (2nd edi-tion). - The MIT Press.

Dirven, R. & Verspoor, M. (Eds.) (1998). Cognitive explo-ration of language and linguistics. John Benjamins.

Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Basingstoke, etc.: Macmillan.

Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.

Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Fuchs, C. & Robert, S. (Eds.) (1999). Language diversity and cognitive representations. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Gelman, S. A. & Bloom, P. (2000). Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it. Cognition, 76, 91-103.

Goldman, A. (1976). Discrimination and perceptual knowl-edge. Journal of Philosophy, 73, 771-791.

Grice, H. P. (1967). The causal theory of perception. In G. J. Warnock (Ed.), The Philosophy of Perception. Ox-ford UP.

Grush, R. (1997). The architecture of representation. Phi-losophical Psychology, 10, 5-23.

Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics. Exploring the biology of language. Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge UP.

Keller, R. (1998). A theory of linguistic signs. Oxford UP.

Kim, J. (1998). Mind in a physical world: An essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kravchenko, A. (1993). K probleme nabludatelia kak sis-temoobrazuyushchego faktora v yazyke. Izvestiya Ros-siiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Literatury i yazyka, 52/3, 45-56.

Levine, A. & Bickhard, M. H. (1999). Concepts: where Fodor went wrong. Philosophical Psychology, 12, 5-23.

Lepore, E. & Pylyshyn, Z. (Eds.) (1999). What is cognitive science? Blackwell.

Leyton, M. (1999). “New Foundations for Perception”. In E. Lepore and Z. Pylyshyn (eds.). What is Cognitive Sci-ence? Blackwell. 121-171.

Margolis, E. (1994). A reassessment of the shift from the classical theory of concepts to prototype theory. Cogni-tion, 51, 73-89.

Margolis, E. & Laurence, S. (Eds.) (1999). Concepts. Cam-bridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Matan, A. & Carey, S. (2001). Developmental changes within the core of artifact concepts. Cognition, 78, 1-26.

Maturana, H. R. (1970). Biology of cognition. BCL Report # 9.0. University of Illinois, Urbana.

Maturana, H. R. (1978). Biology of language: The episte-mology of reality. In G. Miller & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought. - NY: Academic Press.

Maturana, H. (1988). Reality: the search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9, 25-82.

Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cogni-tion: The realization of the living. Boston: D. Reidel.

Moreno, A., Merelo, J. J. & Etxeberria, A. (1992). Percep-tion, adaptation and learning. In B. McMullin & N. Murphy (Eds.), Autopoiesis and perception: A work-shop with ESPRIT BRA 3352. Dublin.

Murphy, N. (1992). The causal and symbolic explanatory duality as a framework for understanding vision. In B. McMullin & N. Murphy (Eds.), Autopoiesis and per-ception: A workshop with ESPRIT BRA 3352. Dublin, 1992.

Nelson, D. G. K., Frankenfield, A., Morris, C. & Blair, E. (2000). Young children’s use of functional information to categorize artifacts: three factors that matter. Cognition, 77, 133-168.

Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cam-bridge, MA: Harvard UP.

Palmeri, T. J. & Blalock, C. (2000). The role of background knowledge in speeded perceptual categorization. Cogni-tion, 77, B45-B57.

Peirce, C. S. (1960). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. 2. Elements of logic. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Pendlebury, M. (1994). Content and causation in percep-tion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, 767-785.

Priest, S. (1991). Theories of the mind. The Penguin Books.

Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). What’s in your mind? In E. Lepore & Z. Pylyshyn (Eds.), What is cognitive science? Black-well.

Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psy-chology, 4, 328-350.

Rosch, E. H. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 1. - N.Y.: Academic Press.

Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.

Salmon, N. (1986). Frege’s puzzle. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.

Sandra, D. (1998). What linguists can and can’t tell you about the human mind: A reply to Croft. Cognitive Lin-guistics, 9, 361-378.

Schlechtman, M. (1997). The brain/body problem. Philoso-phical Psychology, 10 - 2, 149-164.

Schyns, P. G. (1997). Categories and percepts: a bi-directional framework for categorization. Trends in Cog-nitive Sciences, 1, 183-189.

Stich, S. (1992). What is a theory of mental representation? Mind, 101, 243-261.

Srawson, P. F. (1974). Causation in perception. In P. F. Strawson, Freedom and Resentment and other es-says. London: Methuen.

Taschek, W. W. (1992). Frege’s puzzle, sense, and infor-mation content. Mind, 101, 767-791.

Taylor, J. R. (1989). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Tomasello, M. (2000). The pragmatics of word learning. 7th International Pragmatics Conference (Abstracts). Budapest, 9-14 July.

Tomasello, M. & Brooks, P. J. (1998). Young children’s earliest transitive and intransitive constructions. Cogni-tive Linguistics, 9, 379-395.

Varela, F. (1992). Autopoiesis and a biology of intentional-ity. In B. McMullin & N. Murphy (Eds.), Autopoiesis and perception: A workshop with ESPRIT BRA 3352. Dublin, 1992.

Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Oxford UP.

Wallis, G. & Bülthoff, H. (1999). Learning to recognize objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 22-31.

Watson, R. A. (1995). Representational ideas: From Plato to Patricia Churchland. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page