Cogprints
Login | Create Account

A brief introduction to the guidance theory of representation

Rosenberg, Dr. Gregg and Anderson, Dr. Michael L. (2004) A brief introduction to the guidance theory of representation. [Conference Paper]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
184Kb

Abstract

Recent trends in the philosophy of mind and cognitive science can be fruitfully characterized as part of the ongoing attempt to come to grips with the very idea of homo sapiens--an intelligent, evolved, biological agent--and its signature contribution is the emergence of a philosophical anthropology which, contra Descartes and his thinking thing, instead puts doing at the center of human being. Applying this agency-oriented line of thinking to the problem of representation, this paper introduces the Guidance Theory, according to which the content and intentionality of representations can be accounted for in terms of the way they provide guidance for action. We offer a brief account of the motivation for the theory, and a formal characterization.

Item Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:reference, mental content, action
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Language
Biology > Animal Cognition
Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
ID Code:3952
Deposited By:Anderson, Dr. Michael
Deposited On:20 Nov 2004
Last Modified:12 Sep 2007 17:54

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Aloimonos, Y. E. (1992). Purposive active vision. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 56, 840-50.

Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91-130.

Anderson, M. L. (forthcoming-a). Cognitive science and epistemic openness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.

Anderson, M. L. (forthcoming-b). Representation, evolution and embodiment. In: D. Smith (Ed.), Evolutionary Biology and the Central Problems of Cognitive Science, special issue of Theoria et Historia Scientarum, 9 (2005/1).

Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20(4), 723-767.

Ballard, D. H. (1991). Animate vision. Artificial Intelligence, 48, 57-86.

Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (Eds.) (1992). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bickhard, M. H. (1993). Representational content in humans and machines. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 5, 285-333.

Bickhard, M.H. (1999). Interaction and representation. Theory & Psychology, 9(4), 435-458.

Block, N. (1986). Advertisement for a semantics for psychology. In P. French, T. Uehling & H. Wettstein, (Eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy X, 615-678. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, A. (1995). Being There. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dennett, D.C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Dretske, Fred (1986). Misrepresentation. In R. Bogdan, (Ed.), Belief: Form, Content, and Function. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dretske, F. (1988). Explaining behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, Jerry A. (1981). Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. (1987). Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Guignon, C. (1983). Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishers.

Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harman, G. (1982). Conceptual role semantics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 23, 242-56.

Harman, G. (1987). (Nonsolopsistic) conceptual role semantics. In E. LePore (Ed.), Semantics of Natural Language. New York: Academic Press.

Loar, B. (1981). Mind and meaning. London: Cambridge University Press.

Lycan, W. (1984). Logical form in natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Millikan, R. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Millikan, R. (1993). White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Munz, P. (1993). Philosophical Darwinism: On the Origin of Knowledge by Means of Natural Selection. London: Routledge.

O’Donovan-Anderson, M. (1997). Content and Comportment: On Embodiment and the Epistemic Availability of the World. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

O’Regan, K. & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (5), 883-917.

Rescher, N. (1990). A Useful Inheritance: Evolutionary Aspects of the Theory of Knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman.

Rosenberg, G. (2004). A Place For Consciousness: The Theory of Natural Individuals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosenberg G. & Anderson M.L. (forthcoming). Content and action: The guidance theory of representation.

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.