Cogprints

Emerging Consciousness as a Result of Complex-Dynamical Interaction Process

Kirilyuk, Andrei (2004) Emerging Consciousness as a Result of Complex-Dynamical Interaction Process. [Preprint] (Unpublished)

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
398Kb

Abstract

A quite general interaction process within a multi-component system is analysed by the extended effective potential method, liberated from usual limitations of perturbation theory or integrable model. The obtained causally complete solution of the many-body problem reveals the phenomenon of dynamic multivaluedness, or redundance, of emerging, incompatible system realisations and dynamic entanglement of system components within each realisation. The ensuing concept of dynamic complexity (and related intrinsic chaoticity) is absolutely universal and can be applied to the problem of consciousness that emerges now as a high enough, properly specified level of unreduced complexity of a suitable interaction process. This complexity level can be identified with the appearance of bound, permanently localised states in the multivalued brain dynamics from strongly chaotic states of unconscious intelligence, by analogy with classical behaviour emergence from quantum states at much lower levels of world dynamics. We show that the main properties of this dynamically emerging consciousness (and intelligence, at the preceding complexity level) correspond to empirically derived properties of natural versions and obtain causally substantiated conclusions about their artificial realisation, including the fundamentally justified paradigm of genuine machine consciousness. This rigorously defined machine consciousness is different from both natural consciousness and any mechanistic, dynamically single-valued imitation of the latter. We use then the same, truly universal concept of complexity to derive equally rigorous conclusions about mental and social implications of the machine consciousness paradigm, demonstrating its indispensable role in the next stage of civilisation development.

Item Type:Preprint
Additional Information:32 pages, 42 eqs, 54 refs; Report presented at the EXYSTENCE workshop Machine Consciousness: Complexity Aspects (Turin, 29 September - 1 October 2003), http://www.aslab.org/public/events/mcc/.
Keywords:Machine consciousness, dynamic complexity, chaos, fractal, emerging intelligence
Subjects:Computer Science > Dynamical Systems
Computer Science > Complexity Theory
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
ID Code:3857
Deposited By:Kirilyuk, Andrei
Deposited On:06 Oct 2004
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

[1] J. Horgan, The Undiscovered Mind: How the Human Brain Defies Replication, Medication, and Explanation (Touchstone, New York, 2000).

[2] S. Blackmore, Consciousness: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004).

[3] C. Koch, The Quest for Consciousness: A Neurobiological Approach (Roberts & Company Publishers, Englewood, 2004).

[4] F. Crick, The Astonishing Hypothesis (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1994).

[5] D. Dennett, Consciousness Explained (Little, Brown, Boston, 1991).

[6] G.M. Edelman, Wider Than the Sky: The Phenomenal Gift of Consciousness (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2004).

[7] S. Pinker, How the Mind Works (Norton, New York, 1997).

[8] D. Chalmers, The Conscious Mind (Oxford University Press, New York, 1996).

[9] O. Flanagan, The Science of the Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1991).

O. Flanagan, Consciousness Reconsidered (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1992).

[10] Towards a Science of Consciousness: The First Tucson Discussions and Debates, ed. by S. Hameroff (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004).

See also http://consciousness.arizona.edu/conference/ for this series of conferences.

[11] R. Penrose, Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004).

[12] D. Zohar, The Quantum Self (William Morrow, New York, 1990).

[13] Machine Consciousness, ed. by O. Holland, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, No. 4-5 (2003).

See also http://www.machineconsciousness.org/ for further information and references.

[14] I. Aleksander, How to Build a Mind (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 2000).

[15] A.P. Kirilyuk, Universal Concept of Complexity by the Dynamic Redundance Paradigm: Causal Randomness, Complete Wave Mechanics, and the Ultimate Unification of Knowledge (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1997), 550 p., in English.

For a non-technical review see e-print physics/9806002 at http://arXiv.org.

[16] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Dynamically Multivalued, Not Unitary or Stochastic, Operation of Real Quantum, Classical and Hybrid Micro-Machines”, e-print physics/0211071 at http://arXiv.org.

[17] A.P. Kirilyuk, “The Universal Dynamic Complexity as Extended Dynamic Fractality: Causally Complete Understanding of Living Systems Emergence and Operation”, In: Fractals in Biology and Medicine, Vol. III, ed. by G.A. Losa, D. Merlini, T.F. Nonnenmacher, and E.R. Weibel (Birkhauser, Basel, 2002), p. 271-284.

E-print physics/0305119 at http://arXiv.org.

[18] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Universal Symmetry of Complexity and Its Manifestations at Different Levels of World Dynamics”, Proceedings of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine 50 (2004) 821–828.

E-print physics/0404006 at http://arXiv.org.

[19] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Dynamically Multivalued Self-Organisation and Probabilistic Structure Formation Processes”, Solid State Phenomena 97-98 (2004) 21-26.

E-print physics/0404006 at http://arXiv.org.

[20] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Double Solution with Chaos: Dynamic Redundance and Causal Wave-Particle Duality”, e-print quant-ph/9902015 at http://arXiv.org.

A.P. Kirilyuk, “Double Solution with Chaos: Completion of de Broglie's Nonlinear Wave Mechanics and Its Intrinsic Unification with the Causally Extended Relativity”, e-print quant-ph/9902016 at http://arXiv.org.

[21] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Quantum Field Mechanics: Complex-Dynamical Completion of Fundamental Physics and Its Experimental Implications”, e-print physics/0401164 at http://arXiv.org.

[22] A.P. Kirilyuk, “75 Years of the Wavefunction: Complex-Dynamical Extension of the Original Wave Realism and the Universal Schroedinger Equation”, e-print quant-ph/0101129 at http://arXiv.org.

[23] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Complex-Dynamic Cosmology and Emergent World Structure”, e-print physics/0408027 at http://arXiv.org.

[24] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Quantum chaos and fundamental multivaluedness of dynamical functions”, Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie 21 (1996) 455-480.

E-prints quant-ph/9511034 - 36 at http://arXiv.org.

[25] P.H. Dederichs, “Dynamical Diffraction Theory by Optical Potential Methods”, In: Solid State Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, ed. by H. Ehrenreich, F. Seitz, and D. Turnbull (Academic Press, New York) 27 (1972) 136-237.

[26] A.P. Kirilyuk, “Theory of charged particle scattering in crystals by the generalised optical potential method”, Nucl. Instr. Meth. B69 (1992) 200-231.

[27] S. Rahav, I. Gilary, and S. Fishman, “Time Independent Description of Rapidly Oscillating Potentials”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 110404.

[28] M.J. Donald, “Quantum theory and the brain”, Proc. Roy. Soc. London (A) 427 (1990) 43-93.

[29] S. Hameroff and R. Penrose, “Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness”, Neural Network World 5 (1995) 793-804.

S. Hameroff, “Quantum computation in brain microtubules? The Penrose-Hameroff "Orch OR" model of consciousness”, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London (A) 356 (1998) 1869-1896.

S. Hagan, S.R. Hameroff, and J.A. Tuszynski, “Quantum Computation in Brain Microtubules: Decoherence and Biological Feasibility”, Phys. Rev. E 65 (2002) 061901.

E-print quant-ph/0005025 at http://arXiv.org.

See also http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/.

[30] G. Vitiello, “The dissipative brain”, In: Brain and Being - At the boundary between science, philosophy, language and arts, ed. by G.G. Globus, K.H. Pribram, and G. Vitiello (John Benjamins, Amstedam, 2004), p. 317.

E-print q-bio.OT/0409037 at http://arXiv.org.

E. Pessa and G. Vitiello, “Quantum noise induced entanglement and chaos in the dissipative quantum model of brain”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 18 (2004) 841-858.

E-print quant-ph/0406161 at http://arXiv.org.

E. Alfinito and G. Vitiello, “Formation and life-time of memory domains in the dissipative quantum model of brain”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 14 (2000) 853-868; 1613.

E-print quant-ph/0002014 at http://arXiv.org.

[31] A. Mershin, D.V. Nanopoulos, and E.M.C. Skoulakis, “Quantum Brain?”, e-print quant-ph/0007088 at http://arXiv.org.

[32] M. Perus and H. Bischof, “A neural-network-like quantum information processing system”, e-print quant-ph/0305072 at http://arXiv.org.

[33] S. Gupta and R.K.P. Zia, “Quantum Neural Networks”, e-print quant-ph/0201144 at http://arXiv.org.

[34] E.C. Behrman, V. Chandrashekar, Z.Wang, C.K. Belur, J.E. Steck, and S.R. Skinner, “A Quantum Neural Network Computes Entanglement”, e-print quant-ph/0202131 at http://arXiv.org.

[35] H.P. Stapp, “Chance, Choice, and Consciousness: The Role of Mind in the Quantum Brain”, e-print quant-ph/9511029 at http://arXiv.org.

H.P. Stapp, “Decoherence, Quantum Zeno Effect, and the Efficacy of Mental Effort”, e-print quant-ph/0003065 at http://arXiv.org.

H.P. Stapp, “From quantum nonlocality to mind-brain interaction”, e-print quant-ph/0009062 at http://arXiv.org.

[36] M. Dugic, M.M. Cirkovic, and D.R. Rakovic, “On a Possible Physical Metatheory of Consciousness”, e-print quant-ph/0212128 at http://arXiv.org.

[37] A. Kaivarainen, “Hierarchic model of consciousness: from molecular Bose condensation to synaptic reorganisation”, e-print physics/0003045 at http://arXiv.org.

[38] H. Hu and M. Wu, “Spin-Mediated Consciousness Theory: Possible Roles of Oxygen Unpaired Electronic Spins and Neural Membrane Nuclear Spin Ensemble in Memory and Consciousness”, Medical Hypotheses 63 (2004) 633-646.

E-print quant-ph/0208068 at http://arXiv.org.

[39] D. Zohar and I.N. Marshall, Quantum Self: Human Nature and Consciousness Defined by the New Physics (Quill, 1991).

D. Zohar and I. Marshall, The Quantum Society: Mind, Physics, and a New Social Vision (Quill, 1995).

[40] J. Satinover, The Quantum Brain: The Search for Freedom and the Next Generation of Man (John Wiley, 2001).

[41] A. Khrennikov, “Classical and quantum mechanics on information spaces with applications to cognitive, psychological, social and anomalous phenomena”, Found. Phys. 29 (1999) 1065.

E-print quant-ph/0003016 at http://arXiv.org.

A. Khrennikov, “Quantum-like formalism for cognitive measurements”, e-print quant-ph/0111006 at http://arXiv.org.

A. Khrennikov, “Probabilistic pathway representation of cognitive infromation”, e-print q-bio.NC/0408022 at http://arXiv.org.

[42] D.V. Juriev, “Quantum String Field Psychophysics of Nastroenie”, e-print physics/0105066 at http://arXiv.org.

[43] P. Gralewicz, “Quantum computing in neural networks”, e-print quant-ph/0401127 at http://arXiv.org.

[44] Y. Kurita, “Indispensable Role of Quantum Theory in the Brain Dynamics”, e-print quant-ph/0408148 at http://arXiv.org.

[45] D. Aerts and M. Czachor, “Quantum aspects of semantic analysis and symbolic artificial intelligence”, J. Phys. A 37 (2004) L123–L132.

E-print quant-ph/0309022 at http://arXiv.org.

D. Aerts, J. Broekaert, and L. Gabora, “A Case for Applying an Abstracted Quantum Formalism to Cognition”, e-print quant-ph/0404068 at http://arXiv.org.

[46] E.A. Novikov, “Quaternion dynamics of the brain”, e-print nlin.PS/0311047 at http://arXiv.org.

E.A. Novikov, “Manipulating consciousness”, e-print nlin.PS/0403054 at http://arXiv.org.

[47] V.K. Jirsa and H. Haken, “A derivation of a macroscopic field theory of the brain from the quasi-microscopic neural dynamics”, Physica D 99 (1997) 503-526.

V.K. Jirsa and H. Haken, “Field theory of electromagnetic brain activity”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 960-963.

[48] T.D. Frank, A. Daffertshofer, C.E. Peper, P.J. Beek, and H. Haken, “Towards a comprehensive theory of brain activity: Coupled oscillator systems under external forces”, Physica D 144 (2000) 62-86.

[49] M. Toussaint, “Learning a world model and planning with a self-organising, dynamic neural system”, In: Advances of Neural Information Processing Systems 17 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004), 929-936.

E-print nlin.AO/0306015 at http://arXiv.org.

[50] Biophysical Aspects of Coherence (conference 1995), In: Neural Network World, 5 (1995) No. 5.

G.L. Sewell, “Quantum model of biological coherence and chaos”, Ibid., p. 725-732.

J. Pokorny, “Froehlich coherent states: Implications for interaction in biological systems and information transfer”, Ibid., p. 831-847.

[51] A. Juarrero, Dynamics in Action. Intentional Behaviour as a Complex System (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002).

A. Juarrero, “Consciousness as a dynamic attractor”, Report at the International Conference ASSC8 (24-28 June 2004, Antwerp), http://www.assc.caltech.edu/assc8/PLS3Juar.html.

[52] J.A.S. Kelso, Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organisation of Brain and Behaviour (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995).

[53] S. Lloyd, “Ultimate physical limits to computation”, e-print quant-ph/9908043 at http://arXiv.org.

Nature 406 (2000) 1047.

See also: “Seth Lloyd — How fast, how small, and how powerful?: Moore's law and the ultimate laptop”,

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lloyd/lloyd_index.html;

“The Computational Universe: Seth Lloyd”, http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lloyd2/lloyd2_index.html.

S. Lloyd, “Computational capacity of the Universe”, e-print quant-ph/0110141 at http://arXiv.org.

Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 237901.

[54] S. Lloyd, “Universe as quantum computer”, Complexity 3 (1997) 32.

E-print quant-ph/9912088.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page