Cogprints
Login | Create Account

How to Do Things Without Words: Infants, utterance-activity and distributed cognition

Spurrett, Prof David and Cowley, Dr Stephen (2004) How to Do Things Without Words: Infants, utterance-activity and distributed cognition. [Journal (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
624Kb

Abstract

Clark and Chalmers (1998) defend the hypothesis of an ‘Extended Mind’, maintaining that beliefs and other paradigmatic mental states can be implemented outside the central nervous system or body. Aspects of the problem of ‘language acquisition’ are considered in the light of the extended mind hypothesis. Rather than ‘language’ as typically understood, the object of study is something called ‘utterance-activity’, a term of art intended to refer to the full range of kinetic and prosodic features of the on-line behaviour of interacting humans. It is argued that utterance activity is plausibly regarded as jointly controlled by the embodied activity of interacting people, and that it contributes to the control of their behaviour. By means of specific examples it is suggested that this complex joint control facilitates easier learning of at least some features of language. This in turn suggests a striking form of the extended mind, in which infants’ cognitive powers are augmented by those of the people with whom they interact.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:Ape language; Distributed cognition; Language acquisition; Symbols
Subjects:Psychology > Developmental Psychology
Linguistics > Learnability
ID Code:3807
Deposited By:Spurrett, Professor David
Deposited On:07 Sep 2004
Last Modified:19 Dec 2009 19:20

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Bargh, J. 1990. ‘Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction’, in T. Higgins and R. Sorrentino (eds.) Handbook of motivation and cognition, New York: Guilford.

Bargh, J. 1992. ‘Being unaware of the stimulus vs. unaware of its interpretation: Why subliminality per se does matter to social psychology’, in R. Bornstein and T. Pittman (eds.) Perception without Awareness, New York: Guilford.

Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Bates, E. and Begnini, L. 1979. The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.

Bateson, M. C. 1979. ‘The epigenesis of conversational interaction: a personal account of research development.’ In M. Bullowa (ed.) Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication, 63-77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brooks, R. 1991. ‘Intelligence without reason’, in Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kauffman. pp. 569–595.

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. 1967. ‘Recent Contributions to the Theory of Innate Ideas’, Synthese, 17, pp. 2-11.

Christiansen, M.H. and Chater, N. (in preparation) Language as an organism: A connectionist perspective on the acquisition, processing and evolution of language. Oxford University Press.

Clark, A. 1993. Associative Engines, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Clark, A. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. 1998. ‘The Extended Mind’, Analysis 58(1): pp. 7-19

Clark, A. and Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1994. ‘The Cognizer’s Innards”, Mind and Language, 8 (4), pp. 540-547.

Clark, A. and Thornton, C. 1997. ‘Trading Spaces: Connectionism and the Limits of Uninformed Learning’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20:1, pp. 57-67.

Cowley S.J. 1998. ‘Of timing, turn-taking and conversations’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, pp. 541-571.

Cowley, S.J. 2002. ‘Why brains matter: an integrational view’. Language Sciences, 24(1): 73-95.

Cowley, S.J., Moodley, S & Fiori-Cowley, A. in press. ‘Grounding signs of culture: primary intersubjectivity in social semiosis’. To appear in Mind, Culture and Activity.

Cowley, S. J. and Spurrett, D. (2003) ‘Putting apes (body and language) together again’, Language Sciences, 25(3), pp 289-318.

DeCasper, A. J. and Fifer, W. P. 1980. ‘Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers' voices’, Science, 208, pp. 1174-76.

Deacon, T. 1997. The Symbolic Species, New York: Norton.

Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown.

Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M. and Elmehed, K. 2000. ‘Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions’, Psychological Science, 11, pp. 86-89.

Easterbrook, M. A., and Barry, L. A. 2000. ‘Newborns respond differently to smiling and frowning faces’, poster presentation at the International Society on Infant Studies conference, Brighton Colorado.

Ekman, P. 1972. ‘Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion’, in J. Cole (ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 207-283.

Elman, J. 1991. ‘Incremental Learning, or The Importance of Starting Small’, Technical Report 9101, Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego.

Evans, D. 2002. ‘The Search Hypothesis of Emotion’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, pp. 497-509.

Fernald, A. 1992. ‘Maternal Vocalizations to Infants as Biologically Relevant Signals: An Evolutionary Perspective’, in Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides and John Tooby (eds.) The Adapted Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 367-390.

Frank, R. 1988. Passions Within Reason, New York: Norton.

Garcia, J. and Koelling, R. A. 1966. ‘Relation of Cue to Consequence in Avoidance Learning’ Psychosomatic Science, 4, pp. 123-24.

Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Haig, D. 1993. ‘Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, pp. 495-531.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language, New York: Elsevier.

Harnad, S. 1990. ‘The Symbol Grounding Problem’, Physica D 42, pp. 335-346.

Kuhl, P. K., & Miller, J. D. 1978. ‘Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, pp. 905-917.

Laurence, S. and Margolis, E. 2001. ‘The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52, 217-276.

Lock, A. 1991. ‘The role of social interaction in early language development’, In N. A. Krasnegor, D. M. Rumbaugh, R. L. Schiefelbusch, & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lundy, B., Field, T., and Pickens, J. 1997. ‘Newborns of mothers with depressive symptoms are less expressive’, Infant Behavior and Development, 19, pp. 419-424.

Mann, J. 1992. ‘Nurturance or Negligence: Maternal Psychology and Behavioral Preference Among Preterm Twins’, in Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides and John Tooby (eds.) The Adapted Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 367-390.

Maurer, D and Young, R .1983. ‘Newborns' following of natural and distorted arrangements of facial features’, Infant behaviour and development, 6, pp. 127-131.

Meltzoff, A. N. and Moore, M. K. 1977. ‘Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates’, Science 198, pp. 75-78.

Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., and Mehler, J. 1998. ‘Language discrimination by new-borns: towards an understanding of the role of rhythm’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 756-66.

Papousek, H. 1969. ‘Individual variability in learned responses in human infants’, In R. J. Robinson (Ed.), Brain and Early Behavior. London: Academic Press.

Pierce, C. S. 1955. ‘Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs,’ in Justus Buchler (ed.), Philosophical Writings of Pierce, New York: Dover Publications, pp. 98-119.

Ramus, F., Hauser, M. D., Miller, C., Morris, D., & Mehler, J. 2000. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Science, 288, 349-351.

Ross, D. and Dumouchel, P. (MS) ‘Emotions as Strategic Signals’. Available at http://www.commerce.uct.ac.za/economics/staff/personalpages/dross/emote10.rtf

Savage-Rumbaugh, S. 1986. Ape Language. Columbia University Press, New York.

Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Shanker, S., & Taylor, T.J. 1998. Apes, language and the human mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scheper-Hughes, N. 1985. ‘Culture, Scarcity and Maternal Thinking: Maternal Detachment and Infant Survival and a Brazilian Shantytown’, Ethos, 13 (4), pp. 291-317.

Stern, D. 1977. The First Relationship. London: Fontana.

Tartter, V. C. 1980. ‘Happy talk: Perceptual and acoustic effects of smiling on speech’, Perception and Psychophysics, 27, pp. 24-27.

Thelen, E. and Smith, L. B. 1994. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Thibault, P. 2000. ‘The Dialogical Integration of the Brain in Social Semiosis: Edelman and the Case for Downward Causation’, Mind, Culture, and Activity 7(4), pp. 291-311.

Trevarthen, C. 1977. Descriptive analyses of infant communicative behaviour. In H.R. Schaffer (ed.) Studies in mother-infant interaction, pp. 227-270. London: Academic Press.

Trevarthen, C. 1979. ‘Communication and Co-operation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity’. In M. Bullowa (ed.) Before speech, pp. 321-347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Trevarthen, C. 1998. ‘The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity’. In S. Bråten, (ed.) Intersubjective Communication in Early Ontogeny, pp. 15-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Trivers, R. L. 1974. 'Parent-Offspring Conflict', American Zoologist, 14, pp. 249-64.

Turing, A. M. 1950. ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, Mind, 49, pp. 433-460.

Wiesenfeld, A. R. and Klorman, R. 1978. ‘The mother’s psychophysiological reactions to contrasting affective expressions by her own and an unfamiliar infant’, Developmental Psychology, 14, pp. 294-304.

Zajonc, R. 1980. ‘Feeling and Thinking: Preferences need no inferences’, American Psychologist, 35, pp. 151-175.

Zajonc, R. 1984. ‘On the primacy of affect’, American Psychologist, 39, pp. 117-123.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.