Cogprints
Login | Create Account

Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic communication after closed head injury

Bara, Bruno G. and Cutica, Ilaria and Tirassa, Maurizio (2001) Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic communication after closed head injury. [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
87Kb

Abstract

This work is concerned with the decay of communicative abilities after head trauma. A protocol composed of 16 videotaped scenes was devised in order to investigate the comprehension of several types of communicative actions realized with extralinguistic m eans, like pointing or clapping. The protocol was administered to 30 closed-head-injured individuals. The results showed that performance decreases from simple standard acts to complex standard acts, deceits, and ironies. The subjects' performance was wo r se with the scenes reproducing failing, rather than successful, communicative actions. The results are compared with those we previously obtained with a linguistic protocol. A theory of the cognitive processes underlying intentional communication is ou t lined and used to explain the results.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:Communication; Closed head injury; Linguistic vs extralinguistic; Mental states; Speech acts; Neuropragmatics
Subjects:Neuroscience > Neuropsychology
Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
Linguistics > Pragmatics
ID Code:3581
Deposited By:Tirassa, Prof. Maurizio
Deposited On:06 May 2004
Last Modified:12 Sep 2007 17:51

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Airenti, G., Bara, B.G., Colombetti, M. 1993a. Conversation and behavior games in the pragmatics of dialogue. Cognitive Science, 17, 197-256.

Airenti, G., Bara, B.G., Colombetti, M. 1993b. Failures, exploitations and deceits in communication. Journal of P ragmatics, 20, 303-326.

Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do things with words (2nd ed. revised by J.O. Ormson & M. Sbisà, 1975). London: Oxford University Press.

Bara, B.G., Bosco, F.M., Bucciarelli M. 1999. Simple and complex speech acts: What makes the differ ence within a developmental perspective. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, BC.

Bara, B.G., Bucciarelli, M., Geminiani G. 2000. Development and decay of extralinguistic communication. Brain and Cognition, 43, 1-3.

Bara, B.G., Tirassa, M. 1999. A mentalist framework for linguistic and extralinguistic communication. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Cognitive Science (ECCS '99), Siena, Italy.

Bara, B.G., Tirassa M., 2000. Neuropragmatics: Brain and communication. Brain and Language (in press).

Bara, B.G., Tirassa, M., Zettin, M. 1997. Neuropragmatics: Neuropsychological constraints on formal theories of dialogue. Brain and Language, 59, 7-49.

Caplan, D. 1992. Language: Structure, processing, an d disorders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Clark, H.H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Colombetti, M. 1993. Formal semantics for mutual belief. Artificial Intelligence, 62, 341-353.

Colombetti, M. 1999. A modal logic of intentiona l communication. Mathematical Social Sciences, 38, 171-196.

Ehrlich, J., Barry, P. 1989. Rating communication behaviours in the head-injured adult. Brain Injury, 3, 193-198.

Feyereisen, P., Seron, X. 1982. Nonverbal communication and aphasia: A review. Bra in and Language, 16, 191-236.

Foldi, N.S., Cicone, M., Gardner, H. 1983. Pragmatic aspects of communication in brain-damaged patients. In S.J. Segalowitz (Ed.), Language functions and brain organization. New York: Academic.

Grice, H.P. 1989. Studies in th e way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Holland, A. 1982. Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 50-56.

Joanette, Y., Brownell, H.H., (Eds.). 1991. Discourse ability in brain dam age: Theoretical and empirical perspec-tives. New York: Springer.

McDonald, S. 1992. Differential pragmatic language loss after closed head injury: Ability to comprehend conver-sational implicature. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 295-312.

McDonald, S., van Sommers, P. 1993. Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to negotiate requests. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 297-315.

Mentis, M., Prutting, C.A. 1987. Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 88-98.

Page, E.B. 1963. Ordered hypotheses for multiple treatments: A significance test for linear ranks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58 216-230.

Petitto, L. 1987. On the autonomy of language and gesture: Evi dence from the acquisition of personal pronouns in American Sign Language. Cognition, 27, 1-52.

Poizner, H., Klima, E.S., Bellugi, U. 1987. What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Reiter, R. 1980. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13, 81-132.

Searle, J.R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J.R. 1979. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shallice, T., Burgess, P.W. 1991. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727-741.

Sherratt, S.M., Penn, C. 1990. Discourse in a right-hemisphere brain-damaged subject. Aphasiology, 4, 539-560.

Sperber, D., Wilson, D. (1986) Relevance. Com munication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Stemmer, B. 1994. A pragmatic approach to neurolinguistics: Requests (re)considered. Brain and Language, 46, 565-591.

Tirassa, M. 1997. Mental states in communication. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conf erence on Cognitive Science (ECCS '97), Manchester, UK.

Tirassa, M. 1999. Communicative competence and the architecture of the mind/brain. Brain and Language, 68, 419-441.

Wyckoff, L.H. 1984. Narrative and procedural discourse following closed head injury. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.